Because insufficient evidence supported that appellant obtained over $950 worth of goods or services from the two credit card accounts she opened in her deceased stepfather’s name, the Court of Appeal reduced appellant’s conviction of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 484g) to petty theft (Pen. Code, § 490). The Court also remanded the case for consideration of whether appellant’s identity theft conviction should be reduced to a misdemeanor pursuant to Proposition 47 and to clarify whether imposition or execution of sentence was suspended.
^