[Published Decision] The Court of Appeal reversed the juvenile court’s order denying father’s WIC section 388 petition for modification alleging lack of notice and remanded the matter for an evidentiary hearing. Father had requested that the dispositional order be vacated because he was not served with the dependency petition, or notice of the jurisdiction and disposition hearing, or the statutorily required form for asserting paternity. The Court of Appeal concluded that father was entitled to an evidentiary hearing as to whether the Agency ignored the most likely means of finding him and thereby denied him due process.
^