[Published Opinion] The Court of Appeal held that appellant was entitled to retroactive application of the ameliorative changes effected by SB 567 and AB 518 and remanded for resentencing. The Court further held that appellant is entitled to a “full resentencing” on remand at which appellant “may present arguments as to any sentencing issue,” including appellant’s firearm and prior serious felony enhancements. The Court therefore declined to address whether SB 620 and SB 1393 – which took effect before appellant was sentenced – would themselves provide a basis for resentencing.
^