Disagreeing with People v. King (2022) 77 Cal.App.5th 629, the Court of Appeal holds that “a trial court’s inherent authority to correct an unauthorized sentence allows it to modify a final judgment in response to a notice from [CDCR] that a sentence does not contain a legally required component,” including by increasing the aggregate prison term. The court further holds that “the proper remedy [in this situation] is a full resentencing hearing where, as here, the sentence includes multiple components and the trial court exercised discretion at the original sentencing hearing to impose a nonmaximum aggregate prison term.”
^