The Supreme Court agrees with the Court of Appeal that father’s appeal is moot, as stigma alone is not enough to avoid mootness, and father did not provide a tangible legal or practical consequence that would be remedied by a favorable decision on appeal. The Supreme Court concludes, however, that the Court of Appeal erred in determining it did not have discretion to consider a moot appeal. The Supreme Court reverses the Court of Appeal’s judgment dismissing the appeal and remands with directions to reconsider father’s argument that discretionary review is warranted.
^