WPC  ?0Nڄ YٿT-aNa8`Jf3-MF] *N;YXT8nֺS ͽ4ݗ ֩Xdž5Rhؙі< T~;*<\q\ iW @at$!y kL:"tIЈ?_D yu!aHW.ք3F"K`QKv0,l+Oq} hV=, 9/+nh=2dBK)B0Ǭ YZCNʆ컱tcB(@(#^Gt@'k˦7ϪnäU6^q"L$! zĄ'Gg]{@|Z"{VQ4K5{wVHcd:;TZ{mUt}rwTR",(<<_  ƒGe8#U,N % 0Y^ Vwb4fz mU">U@UH  U 6hHP LaserJet 1200 Series PCL 60(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(1$OXXUSUS.,Zw2 >.:i+003|xU\  `&Times New Roman(A Z(Times New Roman +f 0Times New Roman Bold<6X9`(Courier New !XXUSUS.,  _   VICTORIES        StatuteOfLimitations     Peoplev.Woody,A103381(Div.3,8/16/04)  ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:Richard_Moller_    Misdemeanors: Althoughthe  threechargedmisdemeanorsallegedlywerecommittedinMay,   2001,thecomplaintwasnotfileduntilJuly,2002.AccordingtoPenalCode802,the   prosecutionofamisdemeanorsuchasthosechargedhere shallbecommencedwithinone    yearaftercommissionoftheoffense.Thecourtofappealthereforedismissed# # thecharges.   # # FDAPAttorney:FranTernus    # *#  SelfRepresentation   Peoplev.Harris,A102600(Div.1,5/1/03)  PanelAttorney:IrmaCastillo  RevocationOfProPerStatus: Thecourtofappealreversedappellantsconvictionbecause  thetrialcourtrevokedhisproperstatusfollowingthepreliminaryhearingwithoutgood  cause.  FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield  ?+ 4 <DL!X?   Competency     Peoplev._Ary_,A095433(Div.2,3/11/04)  ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:KyleGee    FailuretoOrderCompetencyHearing: Thetrialcourthadbeforeitsubstantialevidence " thatappellant,whowasmentallyretarded,wasnotcompetenttoassistinhisdefense,but # failedtoorderacompetencyhearing.TheCourtofAppealremandedthematterfora $  retrospectivecompetencyhearing. % ! # !# FDAPAttorney:FranTernus &!"  #  #Peoplev.Henderson,A102290(Div.5,10/27/03)  (#$  FDAPAttorney:FranTernus )$% CommitmentToMentalHospital: Thetrialcourtcommittedappellanttoamentalhospital +&' for5yearsafterfindingherincompetenttostandtrialpursuanttoPenalCode1368.The ,'( courtofappealreversedinpart,orderingthe  trialcourttomodifyitsordertothestatutorily -() definedmaximumofthreeyears.    # > #  DueProcess   Peoplev._McCardle_ ,A104195(Div.3,8/31/04)    PanelAttorney: CharlesHolzhauer    TermsOfProbation: Thecourtofappealreversedtherevocationofappellantsprobation   andtheimpositionofasixyearprisonsentence.Thetermofhisprobationrequiredhimto    attendsexoffendertreatment.Consequently,thetrialcourtsrevocationofprobationfor   failingtocompletesexoffendertreatmentwasunauthorizedandconstitutedaviolationof   dueprocess. `     FDAPAttorney:RichardBraucher      PleasAndAdmissions    Peoplev.Copeland,A100420(Div.3,8/31/04)  PanelAttorney:BruceWiener  Admissions: 󀀀Thetrialcourtdidnotfullyadviseappellantofhisconstitutionalrightsand  thedirectpenalconsequencesofthechargedprisonpriorenhancementsbeforeacceptinghis  admissionspriortojurytrial.Thecourtofappealreversed,concludingthattheadmissions  werenotknowingandintelligentunderthetotalityofthecircumstances.  FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield   Peoplev.Minto,A102611(Div.2,7/14/04)  PanelAttorney:LanceRussell   Admissions: 󀀀Theinformationchargedthatappellanthadsufferedthreepriorconvictions " andthathehadnotremainedfreeofprisoncustodyforaperiodof5yearsafterserving said # term.Appellantadmittedthathehadsufferedthreepriorconvictions.Thetrialcourt $  subsequentlyimposed2priorprisontermenhancements.Thecourtofappealreversed:in %!! lightoftheconfusedstateoftherecord,itwasunclearpreciselywhathewaschargedwith &"" andpreciselywhatheadmitted. '## FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield ($$    PleaBargains +'' Peoplev.McLaughlin,A104763(Div.3,6/22/04) -() ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:Attorney:CarolynFershtman    WithdrawalOfPlea: Thetrialcourtwithdrewitsapprovalofapleabargaincallingfora  probationarysentence,butdidnotgivethedefendantanopportunitytowithdrawhisno  contestplea.Thecourtofappealremandedwithdirectionstopermitthedefendantto  withdrawhisplea.   FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman      ConfrontationClause   }Peoplev.Watson,A098183(Div.3,12/10/03)   FDAPAttorneys:ReneeTorres(brief),BradleyO'Connell(argued)   VideotapeofNonTestifyingWitness: Thecourtreversedtwotheftconvictionsbecausethe   videotapedinterviewofthenontestifyingvictimwaserroneouslyadmittedpursuanttoEvid.  Code1380.Theoutofcourtstatementdidnotsatisfythecriteriaofthatprovision  becausethecircumstancesoftheinterviewlackedany particularizedguaranteesof  trustworthiness.Forthesamereason,theadmissionofthatevidenceviolatedthe  ConfrontationClause.   InreEllaC.,A104403(Div.1,3/12/04)  ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:ScottDrexel  Accesstojuvenilecourtrecords: Petitioner,adefendantinacriminalproceeding,sought  accesstotheallegedvictim'sjuvenilecourtrecords(Welf.&Inst.Code,827,subd.  (a)(1)(M)),requestingspecificinformationfromthefileandarticulatingthepurposeof  obtainingsuchdocuments,butthejuvenilecourtsummarilydeniedtherequest.The  appellatecourtruled: Giventheconstitutionalprotectionaffordedadefendantsrightof   confrontation,itwasanabuseofdiscretionforthejuvenilecourttodenypetitioners ! applicationsummarily.Itvacatedthejuvenilecourtssummarydenialofthepetitionand " remandedforahearingonit. # FDAPAttorney:KimberlyFitzgerald $     SearchandSeizure '"#  Peoplev._Jaco_,A100824(Div.2,11/7/03) )$% ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:DianaTeran *%& DetentionAndPatSearch: Thetrialcourterroneouslydeniedthedefendantsmotionto ,'( suppressevidencefortworeasons.First,theconsensualencounterturnedintoanillegal -() detentionwithoutreasonablesuspicionofcriminalactivity.Second,thesubsequentpat  searchforweaponswasconductedwithoutanyreasonablesuspicionthatthedefendanthad  aweaponand,moreover,thesearchwentbeyondthescopeallowedforapatsearch.  Notably,theofficer'sdescriptionthathefeltasoftobjectthesizeofagolfballthatmadea  crunchingsoundindefendant'spocketwasinsufficienttomakeitimmediatelyapparentthat  itwasanarcoticandthereforeseizingtheobjectfromthedefendant'spocketwentbeyond   thescopeofapatsearchforweapons.   FDAPAttorney:KimberlyFitzgerald    Peoplev._Buyrounas_,A103130(Div.4,3/5/04)   PanelAttorney:RobertValencia   ProofOfSearchConditions: Althoughthesearchingofficertestifiedthatappellant had   asearchandseizureclauseonhimwhenhishomewassearched,theprosecutiondidnot   introduceanydocumentationofit.Thecourtofappealconcludedthatthe evidencehere   simplydoesnotrisetoalevelconsistentwithafindingofvoluntaryrelinquishmentofa  constitutionalright,nordoesitadequatelydemonstratethescopeofthewaiver.   Peoplev.Bowers(2004)117_Cal.App_.4th1261  FDAPAttorney:KathleenKahn  ProbationSearch: InlightofPeoplev.Sanders(2003)31Cal.4th318,thecourtofappeal  decidesthatadefendantsprobationsearchconditiondoesnotjustifyhisdetentionora  searchofhispersonifpolicewerenotawareofhisstatusatthetime.   ?+ 4 <DL!X?Peoplev.Keel,A105908(Div.4,12/21/04)  PanelAttorney:GeorgeBenton  ProlongedDetention: Thecourtofappealreversedthedenialofdefendantsmotionto   suppress,findingthattheofficerunjustifiablyprolongeddetentionbecausehewasunaware ! thatavehicleoperatedunderatemporarypermitneednothavefrontlicenseplate.The " momentaryactivationofappellant'scaralarmdidnotprovideadditionalsupportforthe # detention,nordidthepresenceinthecarofapersonwhohadpreviouslyresistedarrest, $  wherethatpersonwaswellbehavedduringthedetention. % ! FDAPAttorney:PaulaRudman &!"  Peoplev.Martinez,A104523(Div.3,10/4/04) (#$ PanelAttorney:GordonBrownell )$% ParoleSearch: Defendant'spocketsweresearchedbasedonhisparolestatus.Itwasunclear +&' whetherthemagistratehaddeniedhissuppressionmotionbecausehefoundthattheofficer ,'( knewabouttheparolestatusbeforesearchingorwhetherhebelievedPeoplev.Sanderswas -() distinguishable.ThecourtofappealmadeitclearthatSandersdoesapplytoapersonal(as  wellasaresidential)searchunderPeoplev.Bowers(2004)117_Cal.App_.4th1261,and  thereforereversedandremandedforthemagistratetofindsomefacts.  FDAPAttorney:KathyKahn   Peoplev._Belperio_,A103620(Div.2,9/1/04)   PanelAttorney: NoraWellman   ParoleSearch: Thecourtofappealholdsthatthe presenceinappellantshome ofavisitor   subjecttoaparolesearchconditiondidnotjustifyawarrantlesssearch.    FDAPAttorney:PaulaRudman    Peoplev.Valenzuela,A98726(Div.5,3/10/03)   ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:MikolBenjacob   ThirdPartyConsent: Thecourtofappealholdsthatalandlordcannotconsenttoasearch  ofatenantsdwelling.Further,thesearchinthiscasecouldnotbejustifiedbyanyexigent  circumstances.  FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield   Peoplev.Steward(2003)113_Cal.App_.4th242  FDAPAttorney:DonaldLipmanson  Standing: Althoughhelivedinatrailer,appellantregularlyvisitedandusedthehouseon  thesamepropertytowatchtelevision,dolaundry,cook,andsocializewiththeresidents.  Reversingthetrialcourtandremandingforfurtherproceedings,thecourtofappeal  determinedthathehadstandingtochallengethesearchofthehouseeventhoughhehadno  possessoryinterestinitandwasnotanovernightguestatthetimeitwassearched.  FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield    Peoplev.Morton(2003)114_Cal.App_.4th1039 " FDAPAttorney:RichardIngram # CommunityCaretakerExceptionToWarrantRequirement: Policewenttoinvestigatea % ! neighborsreportthattheremayhavebeenadrugtheftnextdoor,wheremarijuanawasbeing &!" cultivated.Oneoftheoccupantsinthehousecameoutsidetotalktotheofficers,who '"# testifiedthattheywereinitiallyconcernedthatthegrowerorgrowersmayhavebeenhurt (#$ duringthetheft.Therewasnoevidencepresentedthatthepersonwhocameouttotalkto )$% theofficersappearedtobehurtordistressed.However,whentheotheroccupantsreported *%& tobeinthehousefailedtoalsocomeout,theofficersbrieflyentered,observedmarijuana +&' beingcultivated,andsubsequentlyobtainedawarrant.Thecourtofappealconcludedthat ,'( therewasinsufficientevidencejustifyingtheinitialentryunderthecommunitycaretaker -() exceptiontothewarrantrequirement.Sincethesubsequentlyobtainedwarrantwasbased  onwhattheyobservedduringthatentry,thecourtheldthatthewarrantwasinvalidand  reversedthecultivationconviction.  FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield     AdmissionofEvidence   L=Peoplev._Pantoja_(2004) 122_Cal.App_.4th1   PanelAttorney:FrankMcCabe    TrustworthinessOfWrittenDeclaration: Thecourtofappealreversedappellantsfirst 8  degreemurderconvictionbasedontheerroneousadmission(underEvid.Code1370)of S  thedecedent'sdeclarationallegingthatdefendanthadpreviouslythreatenedtokillher.The j  declarationhadbeenfiledseveraldaysbeforethehomicideaspartofanapplicationfora 1 restrainingorder.TheappellatecourtdiscussesCrawfordv.Washington,butultimately H resolvesthecaseonstatelaw,ratherthanconfrontationgrounds.Thedeclarationdidnot _ meetsection1370'srequirementofindiciaof trustworthinessbecausetherewas a v completeabsenceoffoundationalinformationnecessarytodeterminethereliabilityofthe  statementabouttheallegedthreat,itwaspreparedinconnectionwithlitigation,the  declarantspokealmostnoEnglishandtherewasnoevidenceastowhodraftedthe   declaration,whetheritwastranslatedforthedeclarant,orthe proficiencyofthetranslator. " Also,becausethedeclarationnarratedeventsspanningaperiodofseveralmonths,itwas 9 doubtfulwhetheritmettherequirementthatthestatementbemadenearthetimeofthe P threat.Theerrorwasprejudicialbecausetheallegedthreatwassignificanttopremeditation g andothermensreaissues. .~ ?+ 4 <DL!X?  SufficiencyoftheEvidence s"   Peoplev._Stith_,A102767(Div.4,12/19/03) $ ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:JaniceBrickley %  PriorConvictionAsAStrikeOrSeriousFelony: Thecourtofappealfoundtheevidence ''#! insufficienttosupportthetrialcourt'sfindingthatappellantspriorconvictionforgrossly (B$" negligentdischargeofafirearm(Pen.Code,246.3)wasaseriousfelony(Pen.Code,667)  *Y%# orconstitutedastrike(Pen.Code,1170.12).Thetruefindingastothatpriorconviction  +p&$ wasreversedandremandedforaretrial. 7,'% StaffAttorney:KimberlyFitzgerald N-(& Ї Peoplev.Prasad,A102299(Div.2,7/14/04)  FDAPAttorney:KathyKahn  =E  TerroristThreat/SustainedFear :Defendantmadelotsofphonecallstohisgirlfriendthe  P weekendaftersheleftfollowingafight,alternatelybeggingandthreateninghertocome  g back.TheDAchargedfiveofthecallsas terroristthreatsandgotfiveconvictions.?+ 4 <DL!X?The . ~ girlfriend,however,didnotpickuphermessagesovertheweekendandlistenedtoallof E  themduringonesittingonMonday.Thecourtofappealagreedthattherewasconsequently \  onlyoneperiodof sustainedfearwhichisanelementofPenalCode422and s  thereforereducedfourofthefivecountstoattempts.   H Jurors    K Peoplev._Peraza_ԄWilliams,A098922(Div.2,8/12/04) G ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:JamesJohnson  [  DischargeOfJuror: Thetrialcourtdischargedajurorduringdeliberationsfor failureto 6 deliberate.Thereafter,thejury,whichhadbeendeadlocked,returnedaverdictof Q convictionontwocountsofperjury.Thecourtofappealreversed,findingthatthetrial h courterredunderthestandardsetinPeoplev.Cleveland(2001)25Cal.4th466.  FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman  vL    JuryInstructions + OO# O#Peoplev.Moreno , A100773(Div.5,3/25/04)  "S  PanelAttorney:Anthony_Dain_  #n  Unanimity: Thefailuretoinstructthejuryonunanimity(CALJICNo.17.01)inthislewd I%  actcasewasnotharmless(evenunderWatson),warrantingreversal. d&! FDAPAttorney :RichardSuch {'"   Peoplev.Bell(2004)118_Cal.App_.4th249  )$"  FDAPAttorney:RichardBraucher * &# LateDisclosureOfStatement: ThecourtofappealreversedappellantsLWOPsentencein ,5(% thismurderrobberycasebecausethetrialcourtcommittedprejudicialerrorwhenitgave  CALJICNo.2.28regardingthelatedisclosureofstatementsgivenbyalibiwitnesses.   Peoplev._Ajib_,A099615(Div.2,7/26/02) E PanelAttorneyMartinVelez  Y  FailureToInstructSuaSponteOnTheoryOfDefense: Thetrialcourtinstructedona 4   citizen'sarrestdefensetothechargeoffalseimprisonment,butnotastotheseparate O  chargeofassault.(Bothchargeswerebasedonthesameincident:defendantwaseither f  beatinguphisexortryingtogetbackthe$20,000shehadjuststolenfromhim.)Thejury }  convicteddefendantonlyofmisdemeanorassault.Althoughtrialcounselhadrequestedthe    citizensarrestinstructionastothefalseimprisonmentchargeonly,thecourtofappeal   reversed.Theinstructionappliedtobothcountsandtheerrorwasneitherinvitednor   waived.Thesuaspontedutytoinstructarosebecauseitwasclearthattrialcounselwas )  relyingsolelyonthisdefenseastoallcharges. @ FDAPAttorney:KathyKahn W  Peoplev._Robichaud_,A100930(Div.5,4/27/04) 5 ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:RandiCovin I  TaxEvasion/MentalElement: Taxevasionrequiresproofofavoluntaryandintentional t violationofaknownlegalduty.CALJIC1.20_misdescribes_Ԁthewillfulnesselementoftax  evasion.  FDAPAttorney:JonathanSoglin    Peoplev.Gardner , A101801(Div.4,1/14/04)  ;  PanelAttorney:GraceSuarez !V UnanimityInstruction: Thetrialcourtprejudiciallyerredinfailingtosuasponteinstructon .#~ thenecessityofunanimity(CALJICNo.17.01)inthismultipleoffensemolestationcase;the I$ factthatthejuryacquittedappellantofoneoffensedemonstratedtheydidnotbelieveallacts `%  occurred. w&! FDAPAttorney: RichardBraucher  '"   Peoplev.King , A104219(Div.5,9/3/04) ) %" PanelAttorney:HildaScheib h      p  *'&# ScienterRequirement:   Thecourtofappealreverseddefendantsconvictionfor ,O(% possessingashortbarreledrifle(Pen.Code,12022,_subd_.(a)(1)),becausethetrialcourt  failedtoinstructonthescienterelementofpossession,notingthat ajurycouldhavefound  thatappellantdidnotknowthecontrabandcharacteristicsoftherifle. . FDAPAttorney: RichardBraucher E   Peoplev.Lipscomb,A104023(Div.4,6/17/04) # s ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:CarolynFershtman 7   UnanimityInstruction: Thecourtofappealreversedtwoburglaryconvictionsresultingfrom b  sixentriesintotwodifferentstorestopassbadchecks.Thecourtfoundthatthecontinuous }  courseofconductexceptiontotheunanimity# _# requirementdidnotapplyherebecausethe   entrieswereseparate.Thus,failuretogivetheinstructionprejudicial.     # a# FDAPAttorney:FranTernus    # b# Peoplev.Butler , A101809(Div.2,6/10/04) @ PanelAttorney:BarryKarl   [  UnanimityInstruction: Afterthecourtofappealreversedappellantsconvictionfor 6 possessingstolenproperty(alsoreportedinthisissue),panelattorneyBarryKarlsuccessfully Q petitionedforrehearingandobtainedasecondreversal.Thistime,thecourtreversedatheft h withaprior(Pen.Code,666)convictionforfailuretogiveaunanimityinstruction  (CALJICNo.17.01).  FDAPAttorney:MichaelGinther  O # Oc#  LesserIncludedOffenses ?  OfS Peoplev.Wells , A102621(Div.4,5/20/04)  "j  PanelAttorney:JenniferMannix 5# AttemptedRobbery/PettyTheft: 󀀀Appellantwasconvictedofattemptedrobberyandpetty ]%  theft.Thecourtreversedthepettytheftwithapriorbecauseitisalesserincludedoffense x&! ofattemptedrobbery.(Peoplev.Estes(1983)147_Cal.App_.3d23,28[ Adefendantcannot '"  beconvictedofboththegreateroffenseandthelesserincludedoffense.]) (#!  FDAPAttorney:ReneeTorres ) %" # i# Peoplev.Gray,A101032(Div.4,4/12/04) +;'$ ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:BillCapriola  ,O(% Ї AggravatedSexualAssault: Thecourtofappealvacatedconvictionsforrapeandforeign  objectpenetrationbecausetheywerelesserincludedoffensesofconvictionsforaggravated  sexualassaultofchild. 2 FDAPAttorney:JonathanSoglin I f   Enhancements ;  kj Peoplev.Ruiz,A097648(Div.3,4/19/04) c  ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:LandraRosenthal w   GangEnhancement: Thetrialcourtimposed# k# athreeyeargangenhancement(PenalCode   186.22)torunconsecutively# 2m# Ԁtoappellants25yearstolifesentence# m# .Thecourtofappeal   struckthisenhancement,agreeingwiththereasoningofPeoplev.Harper(2003)109 $  _Cal.App_.4th520,thattheenhancementmaynotbeimposed# An# Ԁunder theclearand ; unambiguouslanguageofthestatuteifthedefendantissentencedtostateprisontolife. R # uo# FDAPAttorney:FranTernus i  # Wp#Peoplev._Heglin_ , A100482(Div.2,2/04) G FDAPAttorney:RichardBraucher  b  OnBailEnhancement: Inapostpleasentencinghearing,thetrialcourterroneously  believeditdidnothaveauthorityunderPenalCode1385tostrikeanonbailenhancement.  Thecourtofappealremandedtopermitthetrialcourttheopportunitytoexercisediscretion  underPeoplev.Meloney(2003)30Cal.4th1145.Italsonotedthatnocertificateof & probablecausewasrequiredunderPeoplev.Buttram(2003)30Cal.4th773.  = # s# Peoplev.Kennedy,A102400,Div.5(8/11/04) "k PanelAttorney:DavidKrueger /# PriorPrisonTerm: ThecourtofappealreversalonePenalCode667.5,subd.(b)prior W%  prisontermenhancementbecause,astheAGconceded,itwasnotseparatebuthadbeen r&! servedconcurrentlywiththetermunderlyinganotherenhancement. '"  FDAPAttorney:BradOConnell (#!  People_v.Hunter_,A101906(Div.5,6/24/04) *&# PanelAttorney:MeredithWatts +2'$  ,F(% PriorPrisonTerm: TheAGconcedesthattwoofappellant'spriorconvictionswerenot   broughtandtriedseparatelyandthuscouldnotformthebasisofseparatePenalCode  667,_subd_.(a),enhancements. 2 FDAPAttorney:PaulaRudman I   Peoplev.Emery,A101494(Div.5,8/11/04) ' w ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:RobertBryzman ;   GangEnhancement/FirearmUseEnhancement: Thetrialcourtimposedbothagangand f  a(vicarious)firearmuseenhancementonappellant.Thecourtofappealreversesthegang   enhancement,concludingthatwhenafirearmuseenhancementisimposedunderPenalCode   12022.53,_subd_.(e),anenhancementforparticipationinastreetgangcannotalsobe   imposedunlessthedefendantpersonallyusedordischargedafirearminthecommissionof   theoffense.# w#  -  # T{# FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield D k# {#  0|p PeoplevDavis,A098177(Div.5,4/14/04) "r ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:SandyUribe  6  ConsecutiveSentences: Trialcourterredinfailingtostatereasonsforimposingconsecutive a sentences.Theissuewasnotwaivedbecausetherewasnomeaningfulopportunitytoobject. | FDAPAttorney:RichardBraucher  ?+ 4 <DL!X? Peoplev.Moore,A099849(Div.5,5/14/04)  ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:Patricia_Cooney_Ԁ %  DoubleCounting: Thetrialcourterroneouslyreliedondefendant'sonbailstatustoimpose !P bothaPenalCode12022.1onbailenhancementandtoimposeconsecutivesentences.The "k courtofappealalsoheldthat654barredmultiplepunishmentforcountsrelatingto 2# possessionofvariousstolenitemsandthatonlyoneconvictionforpossessionofunfinished I$ checks(475,_subd_.(b))ispermittedforeachincident. `%  FDAPAttorney:JonathanSoglin w&!  Peoplev.Butler , A101809(Div.2,3/17/04) (#! PanelAttorney:BarryKarl  )%"  DoublePunishment: Appellantimproperlyconvictedofboththeftwithaprior(Pen.Code, +;'$ 666)andpossessionofstolenproperty(Pen.Code,296)underPeoplev.Jaramillo(1976) -V(% 16Cal.3d752.Possessionofstolenpropertyconvictionreversed.  FDAPAttorney:MichaelGinther   Peoplev.Martinez(2004)116_Cal.App_.4th753B.` hp x (#XB E ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:ChristineDubois  Y GangRegistration: Thecourtofappealstruckagangoffenderregistrationrequirement  m wheretherequirementwasimposedsolelybaseduponthedefendant'scriminalhistory: a 8  crimemaynotbefoundgangrelatedwithinthemeaningofsection186.30basedsolelyupon O  thedefendant'scriminalhistoryandgangaffiliations.Thecrimeitselfmusthavesome f  connectionwiththeactivitiesofagang.... }  FDAPAttorney:JonathanSoglin    Peoplev._Tanuz_,A103091(Div.4,01/28/04)   ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:JosephShipp &   NoContactOrder: The trialcourt'snocontactorderbetweendefendantandminorsex Q offensevictimwasunauthorized.Althoughanocontactordermaybeimposedasacondition l ofprobationunderPenalCode1203.1,_subd_.(I)(2)or(j),thereisnolikeprovisionthat 3 applieswhenthedefendantissenttostateprison. J FDAPAttorney:JonathanSoglin a  Peoplev._Orozco_,A103409(Div.5,10/18/04)  ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:ColleenRohan   MultipleSentencingErrors: Thecourtofappealreducedappellants67yearsentenceto50  yearsbecauseheagreedtowaivejuryontheconditionthathewouldnotreceivedaterm 5 greaterthan50years.Thecourtalsofoundthattheconsecutivedeterminateterm,pursuant  L toPenalCodesection1170.1,mustrunconcurrentlytotheindeterminatelifetermandthat "c onlyoneofthethreeonbailenhancementscouldbeimposedpursuanttoPeoplev.McNeely *#z (1994)28_Cal.App_.4th739,743. A$  FDAPAttorney:FranTernus X%   # #Peoplev.Heller , A102566(Div.1,10/18/04)  '"   PanelAttorney:LindaBuchser h      p    (#!  MultipleConvictions: Whereappellanthadalreadybeenconvictedofalewdact(Pen.Code, *&# 288)asalesserincludedoffenseofcontinuoussexualabuse(Pen.Code,288.5),the +7'$ appellatecourtreversedanotherconvictionofanadditionallesserattemptedlewdact(Pen. ,N(% Code,288),followingtheruleofPeoplev.Pearson(1986)42Cal.3d351,355that   multipleconvictionsmaynotbebasedonnecessarilyincludedoffenses.   FDAPAttorney:RichardBraucher . # ߐ# Peoplev._Cota_,A102608(Div.4,5/24/2004) 󀀀  \  PanelAttorney:RexWilliams  ' w  Old 5YearRule: 󀀀Thecourtofappealreducedappellants10yearsentenceformultiple R  grandtheftsto9yearsunderold 5yearrule.Theoriginalsentenceincluded6yearsof m  subordinateconsecutivetermsfor9grandthefts(9x8mos.each).However,becausethe   underlyingoffensesoccurredin19961997,theaggregatesentencewassubjecttothe 5   yearruleofformerPenalCode1170.1,subd.(a),underwhichthesubordinateconsecutive   termsfornonviolentfeloniescouldnotexceed5years.(Thatlimitationwasabolishedin   1998.) 0  FDAPAttorney:BradOConnell G  Peoplev._Villegas_,A104208(Div5,8/11/04) %u ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:LaurettaMarieOravitzKomlos 9   SexRegistration: Thecourtofappealstrikesasexoffenderregistrationrequirementfrom d theminutesofsentencingbecauseitwasnotmandatedbystatuteinthisstatutoryrapecase  nororallyorderedbythecourtwhenitrevokedprobationandsentappellanttoprison.While  notingthat thecourt'soralpronouncementdoesnotinvariablycontrolovercontrary  statementscontainedintheclerk'stranscript,theappellatecourtcorrectedtheevident  clericalerrorinthiscase.Italsonotedthattheprosecutionindicateditwouldnotrequest + aregistrationrequirementaspartofthepleabargain. B FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman  !Y  Peoplev.Sloan,A100481(Div.4,6/23/04) 7# PanelAttorney:StephenBedrick K$ MurderByMeansOfDriveByShooting :Thecourtofappealreduceddefendants20 s&! yearstolifesentencefor2nddegreemurderbymeansofdrivebyshooting(PenalCode '"  190,_subd_.(d))toastandard15yearstolifestandardsentencefor2nddegreemurderbecause (#! thejuryneveractuallyreturnedadrivebyshootingfindinganddidnotmakeanyother )%" findingssupportingtheenhancedpenalty. *&# FDAPAttorney:JonathanSoglin +6'$  ,M(% ?+ 4 <DL!X? Peoplev.Campbell(2004)119_Cal.App_.4th1279B.` hp x (#XBӀ  PanelAttorney:CarolynFershtman  Proposition36: Thedefendantpledguiltytopossessionofmethamphetamineandwasplaced < onprobationandorderedtoparticipateindrugtreatmentpursuanttoProposition36.After  W hisseconddrugrelatedprobationviolation,thetrialcourtpermittedhimtoenteroutpatient  n (ratherthanresidential)treatmentifhewouldstipulatethathewouldgotoprisonforthe 5  threeyearuppertermifhehadanyfurtherprobationviolations.Hethenhadanondrug L  relatedprobationviolationandwassenttoprisonfortheuppertermperthestipulation;the c  trialcourtgavenootherreasonsforimposingtheupperterm.Thecourtofappealheldthat z  thesentencefollowingthesecondrevocationwasunauthorized,reasoningthatthetrialcourt   erredinpermittingthedefendanttoselectoutpatienttreatmentinexchangeforagreeingto   athreeyearuppertermuponsubsequentviolations.Becausethiswasagainstpublicpolicy,   theappellatecourtrefusedtoenforceitortoholdthatthedefendantwasestoppedfrom &  challengingitsenforcement.Thecasewasremandedforresentencingsothatthetrialcourt = couldproperlyexerciseitssentencingdiscretionincompliancewiththeproceduresoutlined T inProposition36andtherestofthePenalCode. k FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman 2  Peoplev.Davey(2004),previouslypublishedat 122_Cal.App_.4th1548# У#B.` hp x (#XBӀ ` PanelAttorney:AlexGreen t IndecentExposure/Section654: Thedefendantpleadedguiltyamongotherthingstofour  countsofindecentexposure.Inacaseoffirstimpression,thecourtofappealheldthat  pursuanttoPenalCode654,asingleincidentofindecentexposureconstitutesonlyone  offenseforpurposesofsentencing,regardlessofhowmanypeoplewitnessedit.The 5 SupremeCourthasgrantedreview.  L FDAPAttorney :RichardSuch "c  # զ#Peoplev.Butler(2004),previouslypublishedat 122_Cal.App_.4th910# u#B.` hp x (#XBӀ A$ FDAPAttorney:LouisaHavstad U%  BlakelyAppliesToCaliforniaDSL: DivisionTwoheld,inthisnowdepublishedopinion }'"  pendingSupremeCourtreview,thattheUnitedStatesSupremeCourtsdecisioninBlakely (#! v.Washington(2004)542U.S.____[159_L.Ed_.2d403,124S.Ct.2531]appliesto )$" Californiasdeterminatesentencinglaws. *&#  Peoplev.Guevara,A101011(Div.2,11/5/04) ,D(% FDAPAttorney:RichardSuch  FailureToStateReasons :Thecourtofappealconcludesthatthetrialcourterredinfailing ( tostatereasonsforimposingtheuppertermonanumberofoffenses,andthattrialcounsel ? wasineffectiveforfailingtoobjectbecauseitappearsthatthetrialcourtmayhaveimposed  V alesseraggregatesentenceiftherehadbeenanobjection.  m  Peoplev.Rosales,A103004(Div.5,11/17/04) K  PanelAttorney:ChristineLevin _  FailureToStateReasons :Thetrialcourtfailedtostateitsreasonsforrunningtwoterms   consecutively.Thecourtofappealreversed,andnotedthatitcouldreachtheissuedespite   trialcounselsfailuretoobjectbecausetherewasnomeaningfulopportunitytodosowithin   themeaningofPeoplev.Scott(1994)9Cal.4th331,352353,andPeoplev.Gonzales(2003)   31Cal.4th742,752. 3 FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield J  Peoplev.Franklin,A102719(Div.5,11/17/04) (x PanelAttorney:RobertBryzman < Professionalism :Thetrialcourtimposedtheuppertermforthemanufactureof d methamphetaminebasedinpartonitsbeliefthattheoffenseshowedsophisticationor { professionalism.Thecourtofappealfoundtheevidenceinsufficienttosupportthatfactor  andreversed,concludingthateventhoughthetrialcourtgavetwootherreasonsfortheupper  term,therewasareasonablepossibilityitmayhaveimposedamorefavorablesentencein  theabsenceofitserror. ' FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield  >  SL| # S"#  PresentenceCredits  -$} x Peoplev._Susoeff_,A102963(Div.4,2/29/04) X&! PanelAttorney:StevenLubliner l'"  ResidentialTreatmentProgram: Thetrialcourtrevokedprobationandsentencedappellant )$" toprisonafterheabscondedfromaresidentialtreatmentprogram.Itrefused,however,to *%# grantpresentencecreditforthetimespentintheprogram.Thecourtofappealreversed, +'$ concludingthatappellanthadnotwaivedhisrighttothecredits. ,-(% FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield     Restitution,Fines,AndFees E ePeoplev._Buitrago_ , A103172(Div.4,5/20/04)  m PanelAttorney:WilderLee  8   LawEnforcementAgencies: Thetrialcourtorderedappellant,convictedofselling c  methamphetamine,topay$12,000restitutiontoSanMateoCountyNarcoticsTaskForcefor ~  moneyusedtopurchasemethamphetaminefromhim,whichwasneverrecovered .Following   itsearlierdecisioninPeoplev.Torres(1997)59_Cal.App_.4th1,thecourtofappealheldthis   waserrorastheLegislaturedidnotintendalawenforcementagencytobea directvictim   underPenalCodesection1204.4. *  FDAPAttorney:RichardBraucher A  Peoplev.Hanson,A102471(Div.1,1/30/04) o FDAPAttorney:KathyKahn 3   LawEnforcementAgencies: ?+ 4 <DL!X?Thetrialcourtawardedrestitutionfor_CHP_'scostsof ^ respondingtodefendantsfalsebombthreats(Pen.Code,148.1.)TheCHPisnot, y however,a directvictimunderthesefacts,norisitthekindofeconomiclossforwhicha  governmentagencymayrecover.Rather,itisthecostofprosecutionandinvestigation,  whichisnotreimbursableunderPeoplev.Baker(1974)39_Cal.App_.3d550.Further,the  awardmaybereviewedinspiteofafailuretoobjectbelowbecauseitasunauthorized. %  PeopleV._Slagle_,A103232(Div.5,7/10/03) !S PanelAttorney:DavidKrueger "g ParoleRevocationFine: ThePeopleconcededonappealthatthetrialcourterredin ?$ imposingahigherparolerevocationfinethantherestitutionfine.Becausethisisan Z%  unauthorizedsentenceunderPenalCode1202.45,itmayberaisedforthefirsttimeon q&! appeal. '"   Peoplev.Wynn,A105163(Div.4,9/29/04) )%" ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:CharlesJohnson *&#  ImproperAssessment: Thecourtofappealreducedappellants$7200restitutionfineto ,E(% $1600becausethetrialcourt,inusingthestatutoryformularecommendedbyPenalCode  1202.4,_subd_.(b)(2),erroneouslyassessedappellantforapreviouslyimposedrestitutionfine.   FDAPAttorney:FranTernus . # # Peoplev._Sprankle_,A103850(Div.2,10/7/04)  \ ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:AllisonTing  p SufficiencyOfEvidence: Defendant,convictedofreceivingstolenpropertysome,butnot H  allofthepropertystoleninanearlierburglaryofanindividual's storefrontresidence c  wasorderedtopayrestitutionforallofthestolenanddamagedpropertytakeninthe z  burglary,fortheresident'stimeofffromwork,andfortheinstallationofasecuritysystem.   Theappellatecourtstrikesthevictimrestitutionorderasalloftheselossesdidnotresult   fromdefendant'sconduct;therewasnoevidencethathecommittedtheburglary,andonly   somebutnotallofthestolenpropertywasfoundinhispossession.Also,therewasno &  showingthathisconductdeprivedthevictimofpieceofmindandsecurityinhisownhome, = thuscausinghimtoinstallthesecuritysystem.Finally,thecourtnotedthatonremand,the T trialcourtmightorderdefendanttopayrestitutionforthespecificpropertyfoundinhis k possessionbutnotrecoveredbythevictim. 2 FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman I  Peoplev._Naranjo_,A102038(Div.5,6/10/2004 w PanelAttorney:DavidKrueger  SufficiencyOfEvidence: 󀀀Thecourtofappealsignificantlyreducedvictimrestitutioninthis  softwarepiracycase(from$147,264to$25,944),findingthatseveralaspectsofthevictim  company'sestimatesoflostprofitswere purespeculationandnotsupportedbysubstantial 5 evidence.  L FDAPAttorney:BradOConnell "c  Peoplev._Pacheco_,A103507(Div.5,5/24/04) A$ PanelAttorney:AndrewCappelli U%  AdditionalFineAfterRevocationOfProbation: Atthetimeitgrantedprobation,thetrial }'"  courtimposeda$600restitutionfine.Whenitlaterrevokedprobation,itimposedanother (#! restitutionfineof$400.Sincetherehadalreadybeenarestitutionfineimposed,thecourt )$" ofappealstruckthesecondrestitutionorderasunauthorized. *&# FDAPAttorney:BradOConnell +-'$  ,D(%  Peoplev.Lewis , A102515(Div.1,2/24/04)  FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield    AttorneysFees: Thetrialcourtorderedappellanttoreimbursethecountyforthecostofher F defense.Thecourtofappealreversedbecausethetrialcourtfailedtoholdahearingas  a mandatedbyPenalCode987.8,_subd_.(b).Italsoreducedadrugprogramfeebecauseit ( x exceededthemaximumpermittedbyHealth&Saf.Code11372.7,_subd_.(a)). ?   Peoplev.Ibarra,A102348(Div.5,3/16/04) m  PanelAttorney:PaulDeMeester   AdditionalFineAfterRevocationOfProbation: Thetrialcourtimposeda$200restitution   finewhenitgrantedprobation,butincreaseditto$600whenitlaterrevokedprobation.The   courtofappealstruckthelatter,andalsoheldthattheissuecouldberaisedforthefirsttime +  onappealbecausethesecondfinewasunauthorized. B FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield  Y  Peoplev.Solomon,A103134(Div.5,4/9/04) 7 PanelAttorney:RossThomas K ConsolidatedCases: Thetrialcourtimposedtworestitutionfinesfortwocases,whichhad s beenconsolidatedfortrial.Thecourtofappealstruckoneofthem,citingPeoplev.Ferris  (2000)82_Cal.App_.4th1272.  FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield      Parole  N %InreScott(2004)119_Cal.App_.4th871B.` hp x (#XBӀ &#v PanelAttorney:MichaelSatris :$ SubstantialEvidence :Thecourtofappealheldthattheparoleboard'sdecisionthatthis b&! seconddegreemurdererwasunsuitableforreleasewasunsupportedbysubstantialevidence. y'"  ]   Juveniles *&# CInreCristinaM.,A103251(Div.1,4/19/04) ,6(% ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:JacquesLeBoeuf  Manzy.W.: Theappellatecourtfoundthatthejuvenilecourtcommittederrorbyfailingto ( declarewhetherthepresentoffensesweremisdemeanorsorfelonies. C FDAPAttorney:JonathonSoglin  Z  InreColleenS.,115_Cal.App_.4th471 8  FDAPAttorneys:ReneeTorresandKathyKahn L  SuspensionOfDriversLicence: UnderVehicleCode13203,ajuvenilecourt(orany t  othercourt,forthatmatter)cannotsuspendadriverslicenseforalongerperiodthancould   theDMV.Thecourtofappealthereforevacatedthetrialcourtsordersuspendingthe   juvenileslicenseforthedurationofherwardshipfollowinganadjudicationfora   misdemeanor,manslaughter,basedonacaraccident.Moreover,theappellatecourtcould $  reachtheissueeventhoughtherewasnoobjectionbelowbecauseit presented...apure ; questionoflawandimplicatesanexplicitlegislativedirectivenullifyingtheorderthathas R beenentered,..." i  InreMoniqueO.,A104447(Div.2,11/16/04) G ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:DonnaHall [ DoublePunishment: Thetrialcourtsustainedallegationsthatappellantcommitted  violationsofVehicleCode10851(a)(unlawfuldrivingandtakingofavehicle)andPenal  Code496(receivingstolenpropertyi.e.thesamevehicle).Thecourtofappealreversed  thereceivingstolenpropertyfindingbecauseitfounda virtualcertaintythattheunlawful  takingsection10851(a)allegationwassustainedbasedonafindingthattheminorstolethe 3 vehicle,andonecannotbeconvictedofreceivingandstealingthesameproperty.^m ^  J #^m ##^ڇ#FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman^m ^ "a #^m ^##^?# Inre_Corey_ԀP.,A106780(Div.4,10/25/04) #7 ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:GloriaCohen $K  MaximumConfinementTime: Thejuvenilecourterredinfailingtocalculatethemaximum #'s"  termofconfinementfortheminor,whowasremovedfromhisparentshomeandcommitted >(#! toajuvenilecamp.Becausetheminorsustainedonlyoneoffenseandthejuvenilecourthad U)$" calculatedcreditsfortimeserved,thecourtofappealcalculatedmaximumconfinementtime l*%# andorderedthatthedispositionalorderbesomodified. +&$ FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman ,'%  -)&  AntoinetteM.etalv.OscarS.,A101776(Div.1,9/24/04)  ?+ 4 <DL!X?AntoinetteM.etalv.GerardoM.,A101931(Div.1,9/24/04)  PanelAttorney:ScottDrexel(forGerardoM.) ( FDAPAttorney:KathrynSeligman(forOscarS.) < ConfidentialityOfJuvenileCourtRecords: Plaintiffsinacivillawsuitfordamagesagainst  d theNapaSchoolDistrictandtwostudents,bothwardsofthejuvenilecourt,soughtaccess /  tothejuvenilesconfidentialcourtrecords.Theyassertedthatthetwowards,whilein F  middleschool,hadsexuallyharassedtheirdaughter,afellowmiddleschoolstudent. ]  AlthoughtheirdaughterwasnotthevictimofthecrimesforwhichOscarS.andGerardoM. t  hadbeenadjudicatedwards,theystillsoughttoreviewtheirrecordsforevidenceof related   misconduct.Thecourtofappealaffirmedthejuvenilecourt'sfindingthatthewardsinterest   inconfidentialityoutweighedthecivilplaintiffs'interestingainingaccesstotheserecords.    InreEduardoR.,A105422(Div.1,8/26/04) 7 PanelAttorney:DavidHarrison K GangRelatedConditionsOfProbation: 󀀀Thetrialcourtprohibitedappellantfrom #s associatingwithknowngangmembersasaconditionofprobation.Thecourtofappeal > directsthetrialcourttoreconsiderthatconditionbecauseappellant'sbrotherisagang U member.^m ^ l #^m ##^#FDAPAttorney:PaulaRudman   InreIvanG.,A104327(Div.1,7/14/04)  PanelAttorney:AlanStern  VagueProbationConditions: Asaconditionofprobation,thetrialcourtorderedthejuvenile  = nottopossess anyweaponsofanykind,nofirearmsoranyotherweaponsoranythingthat "X evenlookslikeaweaponorcouldbeusedasaweapon.Thecourtofappealfoundthis #o conditiontobeunconstitutionallyvagueandoverbroadandremandedthecasefor 6$ modificationoftheconditioninaccordancewithitsopinion.Italsorefusedtofindawaiver M%  oftheissueduetothelackofobjectionbelowinlightoftheconstitutionalnatureofthe d&! claim. {'"  FDAPAttorney:StephanieClarke (#!  InreJosephC.,A100526(Div.3,3/19/04) *&# ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:ArthurWong +$'$  ,8(% DeferredEntryOfJudgment: Althoughtheprosecutorfiledadeclarationfindingtheminor  eligibleforparticipationinthedeferredentryofjudgmentprogram,thejuvenilecourtnever  considereditandthematterwaseventuallyresolvedbytheentryofaplea.Thecourtof 2 appealreversed.Althoughthejuvenilecourthaddiscretiontodenydeferredentryof I judgmenttoaneligibleminor,itabuseditsdiscretionbyfailingtoconsiderthatoption.  ` FDAPAttorney:MarkShenfield ' w }   MentalHealth i  h?+ 4 <DL!X?Inre(_Kanuri_)_Qawi_(2004)32Cal.4th1   FDAPAttorney:ReneeTorres   _Psychotropic_ԀDrugs: TheSupremeCourtholdsthatadefendantcommittedasMentally   DisorderedOffender(MDO)hasarighttorefusetheinvoluntaryadministrationof 8 _psychotropic_Ԁdrugsunlessthereisaspecificjudicialdeterminationthatheiseither(1) O  incompetentorincapableofmakingdecisionsabouthismedicaltreatmentor(2) f  dangerouswithinthemeaningofWelfareandInstitutionsCodesection5300.Itpoints -} outthatanordinaryMDOadjudicationisnotenoughbecauseitdoesnotrequireanyrecent D overtactorotherproofofrecentdangerousness.Onremandtothecourtofappealto [ determinewhetherthecircumstancesofthecasemetthesecriteriaforinvoluntary r administrationofmedications,theAGconcededthattheywerenotandtheappellatecourt  issuedawritofhabeascorpusbarringsuchmedicationsunlesstherewassuchajudicial  findingofincompetenceordangerousness.   ConservatorshipofJoanB.,A103812(Div.5,4/13/04) 5 PanelAttorney:PaulBernstein   I SufficiencyoftheEvidence: Theimpositionofspecialdisabilities(rightstodrive,enter (#x contracts,refusetreatment,possessweapon)onanLPS_conservatee_Ԁwasreversedasnot C$ supportedbyrecord.Thecasewasremandedforfurtherproceedings. Z%      ParentalRights  (#!  InreKevinC.,A102312(Div.2,4/22/04) *&# ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:AidaAslanian ++'$   ,?(%  ReasonableEffortsToAvoidRemovalFromParentalCustody: WelfareandInstitutions  Code361,subd.(d),providesthatnochildberemovedfromparentalcustodywithouta  findingthatreasonableeffortsweremadetopreventoreliminatetheneedforremoval.In . thiscase,thedepartmentdidvirtuallynothingtoavoidtheneedforremoval.However, E sincethechildhadalreadybeenreturnedtothecustodyoftheparents,aremandforanew  \ dispositionalhearingwasnotnecessary.Butifchildisremovedagaininthefuture,this # s periodmaynotbeconsideredincalculatingtheparentseligibilityforfutureservices. :  # l# FDAPAttorney:FranTernus Q  # #  InreL.P.,A102176(Div.4,4/12/04)   ?+ 4 <DL!X?PanelAttorney:ElysaPerry   Dependency/Visitation: Thecourtofappealheldthatthejuvenilecourthadabusedits   discretionwhenitgavethelegalguardiantheunfettereddiscretiontodecidewhetherthe &  mothercouldvisitminor.Thecourtreachedthemeritsofthisclaimdespitethelackofan = objectioninthejuvenilecourt. T FDAPAttorney:JonathanSoglin# ]#^m ^ k #^m ##^# S# S# # # # !# # y# # #