ÿWPCî+ +Œ^WUäë…u/„×û^bÏ4ÈöÐ’"nÌcŒ<É‘ˆ¥–˜èãÒ|šFQŠXBõ,dM>Ï‹[ùš ð’0RÝEÁ=Û“>hÂì–-HªÑYþÎÆŠúÆ@ìÒ[;­©â¸ÃO£ònï"¢IÀƒˆ£ƒŸ_ Ëe±~Ãa –yšãÃämƒ;G½`§/k͘•›þù{]¼ÔA=Äì 7ußoàp:>Ö(ö¼²H_y’ÇuоaÄ+’L¦mÉþµmÒ¦ãÕ«Ý_ Ù.Ê@7KÊŸ´…sá€@»Èžƒsº–K(¼hý Õçäbs)‡PF$KÔ•p*_·B$Yþݯ†¤ýÝ(`ëlÂÖÊ9[ò{¦8I²› _`ΖŠå?å¾R¬“§Ž2k:&ËŸÀदȌï­bd½¾——:¬ïba¬•v^ô°÷PJ"B•R“TcŸbh¨Ûžfgé…ùÆäªkgê·o¥ä½­ò‰[j1î¼Ì‹™¾(­yxƪ :ËRQÖ°BªSÊK]£·D~²£ãjŒ?¼ÐÝ6y‹­vGJ*„4±åhº6|S¼Íi}#ÉÖUNŸ %í 0(ó 0C 0v^^^^ Ôwà4äø m  1u         72•••••••••• ZÇã! Zk^ ZÉi# ZŒŒæ XrgÊ Z1 w‹  Z!j\!\!\! ZÆ!h " Zˆ"jâ" RL#„ž# Z"$Š|$ Z%i`% VÉ%†& Z¥&lÿ& Xk'‡Ã'Ã'Ã'Ã'Ã'Ã'Ã'Ã'Ã' 0cJ(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J(J( B­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(­(ÆÊ( 0e)Æõ)õ)õ)õ)õ) 0e»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»*»* Z +tz+˜HP LaserJet 1200 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡(ÿÿ$òòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó(-!2Vf$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÓÓ€€€€€òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó|µÔ.Ï €–.ûƒ3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)"In re Elizabeth M. (1997) ___ Cal.App.4t1 ÙÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Elizabeth€M.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1997)€___€Cal.App.4th€___,Ìà  àprinted€on€January€30,€1997Ìà  àin€97€Daily€Journal€Ô_ÔD.A.R.Ô_Ô€1055.$In re Jasmine J. (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 11 aÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Jasmine€J.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€46€Cal.App.4th€1802&In re Lauren P. (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 761 _Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Lauren€P.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€44€Cal.App.4th€763(In re Nachelle S. (1996) 41 Cal.App.4th 1 ‚Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔNachelleÔ_Ô€S.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€41€Cal.App.4th€1557*In re Gary P. (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 8751 ]Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Gary€P.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€40€Cal.App.4th€875,Clifford S. v. Superior Court (1995) 38 1 mÔ_ÔòòClifford€S.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€38€Cal.App.4th€747.In re Vanessa Z. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 21 `Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Vanessa€Z.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1994)€23€Cal.App.4th€2582In re Joel H. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 11851 ^Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Joel€H.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1993)€19€Cal.App.4th€11854In re Rachel C. (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 141 `Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Rachel€C.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1991)€235€Cal.App.3d€14456In re Kieshia E. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 681 zÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔKieshiaÔ_Ô€E.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1993)€6€Cal.4th€688In re Hirenia C. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 51 €Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔHireniaÔ_Ô€C.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1993)€18€Cal.App.4th€504:In re Sarah M. (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 1481 _Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Sarah€M.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1991)€233€Cal.App.3d€1486<In re Chantal S. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1961 |Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔChantalÔ_Ô€S.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€13€Cal.4th€196>In re Elizabeth M. (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d1 bÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Elizabeth€M.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1991)€232€Cal.App.3d€553@In re Tomi C. (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 6941 }Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔTomiÔ_Ô€C.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1990)€218€Cal.App.3d€694(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à dA, B,Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 54#B22Quick A.ÚƒbÚÚ  Ú.à0 àÛ€bÛ1, 2, 3,Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 54#BÂ2Quick 1.ÚƒdÚÚ  Ú.à0 àÛ€dÛ|Allen M. v. Superior Court (1992) 6 Cal.1 jÔ_ÔòòAllen€M.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1992)€6€Cal.App.4th€1069Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔòòóóÔ€ŠÐ׈XXÔò òÓ  ÓSTANDING€IN€DEPENDENCY€CASESÐ ° ÐÌó óBy€Ô_ÔReneÔ_Ô€E.€TorresÐ ¬ü ÐStaff€Attorney,€First€District€Appellate€ProjectÐ ¬ü ÐÓ ÓMay,€2001Ó  ÓÐ ¬ü ÐÓSÓà@ìì*ìàò òòòó óóóˆÌÌà0  àòòCatherine€P.€v.€Ô_ÔNgocÔ_Ô€P.óó€(òòIn€re€Anthony€P.óó)€(2000)€84€Cal.App.4th€1112,€1117.€€OnÐ ¬ ü Ðher€appeal€from€order€terminating€her€parental€rights,€mother€has€no€standing€toÐ ¬ ü Ðraise€fatherððs€lack€of€due€process€in€an€attempt€to€defeat€the€termination€of€herÐ ¬ ü  Ðparental€rights.Ьü (#(# Ðà  àÌà0  àòòIn€re€Ô_ÔDeJohnÔ_Ô€B.óó€(2000)€84€Cal.App.4th€100,€110.€€If€the€judgment€terminatingÐ ¬ü  Ðmotherððs€parental€rights€is€reversed,€the€judgment€terminating€fatherððs€parentalÐ ¬ü  Ðrights€will€be€reversed€as€well,€despite€the€absence€of€independent€error€pertainingÐ ¬ü  Ðto€him,€depending€upon€whether€there€are€impediments€to€reversal.Ьü(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Joseph€G.óó€(2000)€83€Cal.App.4th€712.€€An€alleged€biological€father€who€isÐ ¬ü Ðnot€a€party€of€record€in€the€dependency€court€has€no€standing€to€appeal€an€orderÐ ¬ü Ðterminating€parental€rights.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€716.)€€Ð¬ü(#(# ÐÌà0  àAs€a€general€rule,€a€parent€may€appeal€from€termination€of€parental€rights.€Ð ¬ü ÐHowever,€only€parties€of€record€may€appeal.€€A€party€of€record€is€a€person€namedÐ ¬ü Ðas€a€party€to€the€proceedings€or€one€who€takes€appropriate€steps€to€become€a€partyÐ ¬ü Ðof€record€in€the€proceedings.€€A€person€does€not€become€a€party€of€record€merelyÐ ¬ü Ðbecause€his€or€her€name€and€interest€appear€in€documents€filed€with€the€court€orÐ ¬ü Ðare€referenced€in€the€judgment.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€715.)€€Ð¬ü(#(# ÐÌà0  àNotice€of€the€dependency€proceedings€and€alleged€father€status€simply€give€aÐ ¬ ü Ðperson€an€opportunity€to€seek€to€become€a€party€of€record€to€the€dependencyÐ ¬!ü Ðproceedings.€€Nor€does€fact€that€person€is€referenced€by€name€in€termination€orderÐ ¬"ü Ðestablish€party€status€where€identification€of€person€is€a€result€of€statutory€notice,Ð ¬#ü Ðnot€personððs€status€as€party€of€record.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€715„716.)Ь$ü (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Frank€L.óó€(2000)€81€Cal.App.4th€700,€702„704.€€Generally,€parents€can€appealÐ ¬&ü!" Ðjudgments€or€orders€in€juvenile€dependency€matters.€€However,€a€parent€must€alsoÐ ¬'ü"# Ðestablish€she€is€a€ð ðparty€aggrievedðð€to€obtain€a€review€of€a€ruling€on€the€merits.€Ð ¬(ü#$ ÐTherefore,€a€parent€cannot€raise€issues€on€appeal€from€a€dependency€matter€that€doÐ ¬)ü$% Ðnot€affect€her€own€rights.€€Standing€to€appeal€is€jurisdictional.Ь*ü%&(#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€interest€of€siblings€or€other€relatives€in€their€relationship€with€the€minor€isÐ ¬,ü'( Ðseparate€from€that€of€the€parent.€€Therefore,€a€parent€has€no€standing€to€raise€anÐ ¬-ü() Ðissue€related€to€the€minorððs€right€to€visit€his€siblings.€€Likewise,€the€parent€has€noÐ ° Ðstanding€to€raise€issues€related€to€the€minorððs€right€to€see€his€grandparents.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àParentððs€argument€that€the€courtððs€order€does€not€serve€minorððs€best€interest€basedÐ ° Ðon€the€potential€change€in€minorððs€relationship€with€his€siblings€or€his€grandmotherÐ ° Ðis€an€issue€not€related€to€parentððs€interest€and€parent€lacks€standing€to€raise€thatÐ °  Ðissue€on€appeal.а (#(# ÐÌà0  àLikewise,€parent€does€not€have€standing€to€raise€the€issue€of€whether€minorððsÐ °  Ðcounsel€was€ineffective€as€a€result€of€his€counselððs€representation€of€him€and€hisÐ °  Ðsiblings.€€Fact€that€motherððs€parental€rights€are€still€intact€and€that€mother€claimsÐ °  Ðher€interests€are€intertwined€with€siblingsðð€interests,€who€oppose€minorððs€out„of„Ð °  Ðstate€placement,€do€not€give€mother€standing.€€Ð° (#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€mere€fact€a€parent€takes€a€position€on€a€matter€at€issue€in€a€juvenileÐ ° Ðdependency€case€which€affects€his€or€her€child€does€not€alone€constitute€aÐ ° Ðsufficient€reason€to€establish€standing€to€challenge€an€adverse€ruling€on€it.€€ToÐ ° Ðhave€standing,€parent€must€show€how€the€alleged€conflict€of€interest€affects€her.€Ð ° ÐParentððs€citation€to€adverse€impact€of€joint€representation€of€siblings€isÐ ° Ðinsufficient.€€€Without€some€showing€that€her€personal€rights€were€affected,€parentÐ ° Ðhas€no€standing.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àNor€does€the€fact€parentððs€interest€may€be€intertwined€with€siblings€createÐ ° Ðstanding.€€Even€if€the€fact€that€siblingsðð€interests€conflicted€with€minorððs€wouldÐ ° Ðgive€them€standing€to€raise€that€issue€on€appeal,€mother€cannot€do€so€on€theirÐ ° Ðbehalf.€€Also,€parentsðð€rights€are€not€directly€at€issue€after€permanent€plan€has€beenÐ ° Ðselected.€€(Compare€òòIn€re€Patricia€E.óó€(1985)€174€Cal.App.3d€1,€5.)а(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Ô_ÔClifftonÔ_Ô€B.óó€(2000)€81€Cal.App.4th€415.€€Parent€has€no€standing€to€raise€issuesÐ °  Ðregarding€siblingsðð€interest€in€each€other,€since€his€own€rights€are€not€affectedÐ °! Ðthereby.€€A€parent€is€not€aggrieved€by€sibling€visitation€order€because€parentððsÐ °" Ðinterest€in€dependency€proceedings€is€reunification.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€425.)€Ð°#(#(# ÐÌà0  àParent€does€have€standing€to€raise€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel€on€behalf€of€hisÐ °%!! Ðchildren,€even€on€appeal€from€order€terminating€parental€rights.€€IndependentÐ °&"" Ðrepresentation€of€the€childððs€interest€impact€upon€the€parentððs€interest€in€the€parent„Ð °'## Ðchild€relationship.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€427„428.)а($$(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Jasmine€D.óó€(2000)€78€Cal.App.4th€1339,€1343,€fn.€3.€€On€appeal€from€ordersÐ °*&& Ðterminating€parental€rights,€standing€of€father€who€files€no€brief€of€his€own€to€joinÐ °+'' Ðin€motherððs€brief€and€complain€about€termination€of€her€parental€rights€isÐ °,(( Ðquestionable,€to€say€the€least.а-))(#(# Їà0  àòòIn€re€Caitlin€B.óó€(2000)€78€Cal.App.4th€1190,€1193„1194.€€Parent€has€no€standing€toÐ ° Ðcontend€the€juvenile€court€erred€in€terminating€her€parental€rights€because€neitherÐ ° Ðalleged€father€had€proper€notice€of€the€section€366.26€hearing.€€A€parentððs€interestÐ ° Ðis€limited€to€the€continuation€or€termination€of€his€or€her€own€parental€rights.€€AÐ ° Ðmotherððs€interests€do€not€interweave€with€those€of€a€natural€father€whom€sheÐ ° Ðcannot€identify€and€with€whom€she€has€no€continuing€relationship.€€A€parentððsÐ °  Ðstatutory€right€to€a€particular€form€of€notice€or€a€more€generalized€due€processÐ °  Ðright€to€be€heard€are€personal.€€Finally,€the€compulsory€joinder€provision€of€ruleÐ °  Ð1463€does€not€confer€on€a€mother€the€right€to€urge€an€appeal€that€an€error€inÐ °  Ðterminating€a€fatherððs€parental€rights€redounds€to€her€benefit€so€as€to€make€intoÐ °  Ðerror€an€errorless€termination€of€her€parental€rights.а (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Margarita€D.óó€(1999)€72€Cal.App.4th€1288,€1298.€€Where€a€valid€and€finalÐ °  Ðjudgment€of€paternity€is€in€place€as€to€a€presumed€father,€a€mere€biological€fatherÐ °  Ðhas€no€standing€to€pursue€a€section€388€petition.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Carissa€G.óó€(1999)€72€Cal.App.4th€731.€€Generally,€a€parent€can€appeal€theÐ ° Ðjudgment€in€a€juvenile€dependency€matter.€€But€as€in€any€appeal€the€parent€mustÐ ° Ðalso€establish€he€or€she€is€a€ð ðparty€aggrievedðð€to€obtain€a€review€of€a€ruling€on€itsÐ ° Ðmerits.€€To€be€aggrieved,€a€party€must€have€a€legally€cognizable€immediate€andÐ ° Ðsubstantial€interest€which€is€injuriously€affected€by€the€courtððs€decision.€€AÐ ° Ðnominal€interest€or€remote€consequence€of€the€ruling€does€not€satisfy€thisÐ ° Ðrequirement.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€734.)а(#(# ÐÌà0  àA€conflict€currently€exists€in€the€case€law€concerning€whether€a€parent€hasÐ ° Ðstanding€to€appeal€an€order€dismissing€a€juvenile€dependency€petition€after€aÐ ° Ðcontested€jurisdictional€hearing.€€Siding€with€the€authority€that€holds€that€a€parentÐ ° Ðlacks€standing€to€challenge€that€ruling,€a€mother€has€no€standing€to€challenge€theÐ ° Ðjuvenile€courtððs€dismissal€of€a€petition€alleging€fatherððs€sexual€abuse€of€the€minorÐ °  Ðafter€a€contested€hearing.€€Where€(1)€dismissal€of€the€petition€did€not€alter€theÐ °! Ðminorððs€custody€status;€(2)€a€sustained€petition€would€have€altered€that€status€onlyÐ °" Ðslightly€by€limiting€fatherððs€visits;€(3)€dismissal€eliminated€necessity€for€motherððsÐ °# Ðparticipation€in€any€programs;€and€(4)€dismissal€did€not€leave€mother€without€aÐ °$  Ðremedy€in€family€court,€dismissal€of€petition€did€not€impact€motherððs€fundamentalÐ °%!! Ðright€to€parent€and€mother€is€not€an€aggrieved€party€entitled€to€appeal.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.Ð °&"" Ð734„736.)а'##(#(# ÐÌà0  àWhile€parents€are€entitled€to€appear€and€participate€in€a€juvenile€dependencyÐ °)%% Ðaction,€the€proceeding€is€initiated€by€the€state,€under€the€theory€of€ò òòòÔ_ÔparensÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔpatriaeÔ_Ôóóó ó,Ð °*&& Ðto€protect€a€minor€from€abuse€or€neglect€as€defined€by€section€300.€€Thus,€the€mereÐ °+'' Ðfact€a€parent€takes€a€position€on€a€matter€at€issue€in€a€juvenile€dependency€caseÐ °,(( Ðwhich€affects€his€or€her€child€does€not€alone€constitute€a€sufficient€reason€toÐ °-)) Ðestablish€standing€to€challenge€an€adverse€ruling€on€it.€€Further,€a€parent€has€noÐ ° Ðstatutory€right€to€present€evidence€in€support€of€a€dependency€petition€if€theÐ ° Ðjuvenile€court€grants€the€motion€to€dismiss€upon€receiving€evidence€from€theÐ ° Ðpetitioner€and€the€minor.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€736„738.)а(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòLos€Angeles€County€Department€of€Children€and€Family€Services€v.€SuperiorÐ °  ÐCourtóó€(1998)€62€Cal.App.4th€1,€11.€€€Upon€termination€of€parental€rights,€mother'sÐ °  Ðstanding€to€participate€in€dependency€proceedings€is€eliminated.а (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Ô_ÔDevinÔ_Ô€M.óó€(1997)€58€Cal.App.4th€1538,€1540„1542.€€On€appeal€from€orderÐ °  Ðterminating€her€parental€rights,€mother€has€no€standing€to€challenge€that€order€onÐ °  Ðthe€ground€that€the€order€results€in€the€severance€of€her€child's€relationship€with€hisÐ °  Ðfoster€family.€€A€parent€cannot€raise€issues€on€appeal€which€do€not€affect€his€or€herÐ °  Ðown€rights.€€A€parent's€interest€is€in€reunification.€€Regardless€of€whether€theÐ °  Ðargument€is€phrased€as€an€assertion€of€third„party€or€first„party€rights,€parent€lacksÐ ° Ðstanding€to€raise€the€issue€of€the€severance€of€the€relationship€between€the€minorÐ ° Ðand€his€or€her€foster€family.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Jessie€G.óó€(1997)€58€Cal.App.4th€1,€9,€fn.€3.€€On€appeal€from€order€terminatingÐ ° Ðher€parental€rights,€parent€does€not€have€standing€to€raise€absence€of€siblingÐ ° Ðvisitation.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Joshua€M.óó€(1997)€56€Cal.App.4th€801,€807.€€One€parent€cannot€claimÐ ° Ðineffective€assistance€of€the€other€parent's€counsel€when€the€other€parent€has€notÐ ° Ðappealed.€€(Compare,€òòIn€re€James€S.óó€(1991)€227€Cal.App.3d€930,€933,€fn.€6.)а(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòJanice€J.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1997)€55€Cal.App.4th€690,€691„692.€€A€rule€39.1BÐ ° Ðpetition€may€be€summarily€dismissed€in€the€absence€of€a€showing€that€the€parentÐ ° Ðconsented€to,€or€authorized€the€filing€of,€the€petition.€€Where€the€record€indicatesÐ °  Ðthe€attorney€signed€the€notice€of€intent€because€the€parent€had€disappeared,€theÐ °! Ðburden€of€proof€must€shift€to€the€parent€to€show€he€or€she€consented€to€orÐ °" Ðauthorized€the€petition.€€An€attorney€representing€one€of€these€parents€has€noÐ °# Ðprofessional€duty€to€file€a€rule€39.1B€writ€petition€in€the€absence€of€the€client'sÐ °$  Ðauthorization.€€If€the€client€has€disappeared€by€the€time€the€section€366.26€hearingÐ °%!! Ðis€set,€fails€to€stay€in€contact€with€the€attorney,€and€has€not€signed€a€documentÐ °&"" Ðindicating€his€or€her€personal€authorization€of€the€writ€petition,€then€the€attorney€isÐ °'## Ðabsolved€from€any€professional€responsibility€to€file€a€notice€of€intent€or€a€petition.а($$(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ_ÔÔ €! ÔÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Elizabeth€M.óó€(1997)€52€Cal.App.4th€318,€324.€€Parent€has€standing€toÐ °*&& Ðchallenge€cognizable€order€denying€his/her€section€388€petition€on€appeal€fromÐ °+'' Ðorders€terminating€parental€rights€even€though€petition€raised€issues€of€minor'sÐ °,(( Ðprospective€adoptive€placement€and€not€parent's€interest€in€custody€orÐ °-)) Ðreunification.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €# ÔòòIn€re€Jasmine€J.óó€(1996)€46€Cal.App.4th€1802,€1806„1808.€On€appeal,€parent€mayÐ ° Ðnot€oppose€order€terminating€his€parental€rights€on€grounds€that€he€was€refused€aÐ ° Ðcontested€366.26€hearing€at€which€he€offered€to€prove€that€termination€of€parentalÐ ° Ðrights€would€not€be€in€the€best€interest€of€minor€who€would€thereby€be€separatedÐ °  Ðfrom€her€sibling.€€Under€these€circumstances,€parentððs€argument€for€reversal€ofÐ °  Ðorder€terminating€parental€rights€is€essentially€an€argument€advancing€siblings'Ð °  Ðinterests,€not€his€own.€€Parent€has€no€standing€to€raise€issues€regarding€siblings'Ð °  Ðinterests.а (#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €% ÔòòIn€re€Lauren€P.óó€(1996)€44€Cal.App.4th€763,€770.€€A€public€agency€is€not€the€onlyÐ °  Ðparty€whose€interest€is€affected€by€the€dismissal€of€a€dependency€petition.€€AnyÐ °  Ðparent€who€takes€the€position€that€dependency€jurisdiction€is€warranted€isÐ °  Ðaggrieved€by€dismissal€of€the€petition.€€Just€as€a€parent€must€be€permitted€toÐ ° Ðpresent€evidence€and€to€argue€in€opposition€to€dismissal€below,€so€such€a€parentÐ ° Ðmust€be€allowed€to€appeal€from€a€dismissal€of€the€petition€on€the€merits.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ_ÔÔ €' ÔÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔNachelleÔ_Ô€S.óó€(1996)€41€Cal.App.4th€1557.€€On€appeal€following€orderÐ ° Ðterminating€her€parental€rights,€mother€does€not€have€standing€to€raise€minor'sÐ ° Ðright€to€a€court€order€concerning€visitation€with€her€siblings.€€In€civil€cases,€such€asÐ ° Ðdependency€actions,€only€an€aggrieved€party€may€appeal.€€(Code€Civ.€Proc.,€ððÐ ° Ð902.)€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1560.)€€A€mother€is€not€aggrieved€by€a€court's€determinationÐ ° Ðregarding€sibling€visits.€€Mother's€interest€in€proceedings€is€her€reunification€withÐ ° Ðminor.€€Siblings'€connections€with€proceedings€is€their€interest€and€relationshipÐ ° Ðwith€the€mother.€€Orders€concerning€siblings€do€not€impinge€mother's€discreteÐ ° Ðinterest.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€1560„1562.)а(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €) ÔòòIn€re€Gary€P.óó€(1995)€40€Cal.App.4th€875,€876„877.€€An€appellant€cannot€urgeÐ °  Ðerrors€which€affect€only€another€party€who€does€not€appeal.€€On€appeal€from€orderÐ °! Ðterminating€her€parental€rights,€mother€does€not€have€standing€to€contend€thatÐ °" ÐÔ_Ôorder€is€not€in€minors'€best€interest€because€adoption€would€sever€ties€with€theirÐ °# Ðmaternal€grandmother.€€That€issue€does€not€concern€mother's€rights.€€Nor€is€motherÐ °$  Ðaggrieved€by€fact€termination€order€may€sever€grandmother's€ties€with€minors.€Ð °%!! ÐThus,€mother€can€not€challenge€termination€order€on€either€siblings'€orÐ °&"" Ðgrandmother's€behalf.а'##(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €+ ÔòòClifford€S.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€38€Cal.App.4th€747,€751„752.€€A€de€factoÐ °)%% Ðparent€has€a€right€to€appeal€certain€issues.€€However,€a€de€facto€parent,€like€aÐ °*&& Ðstepparent,€has€no€right€to€reunification€services€and,€therefore,€does€not€haveÐ °+'' Ðstanding€to€challenge€the€denial€of€reunification€services€or€contest€theÐ °,(( Ðreasonableness€of€service€offered.а-))(#(# Їà0  àÔ €- ÔòòIn€re€Vanessa€Z.óó€(1994)€23€Cal.App.4th€258,€261.€€A€parent€is€not€aggrieved€by€anÐ ° Ðorder€denying€relative€de€facto€parent€status€and,€hence,€has€no€standing€to€appealÐ ° Ðthat€order.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €1 ÔòòIn€re€Joel€H.óó€(1993)€19€Cal.App.4th€1185.€€De€facto€parents€have€standing€toÐ ° Ðappeal.€€That€standing€is€not€limited€to€the€"core€de€facto€parent€status€rights"€to€beÐ °  Ðpresent,€to€be€represented€by€counsel,€and€to€present€evidence;€de€facto€parentsÐ °  Ðmay€raise€other€appellate€issues€as€long€as€they€are€an€aggrieved€party.€€ForÐ °  Ðexample,€a€de€facto€parent€is€aggrieved€by€an€order€removing€a€minor€from€his€orÐ °  Ðher€physical€custody.€€Also,€de€facto€parent€status€does€not€depend€on€the€existenceÐ °  Ðof€judicial€proceedings.€€Therefore,€the€termination€of€dependency€jurisdictionÐ °  Ðdoes€not€terminate€de€facto€parent€status€and€quit€the€de€facto€parent€of€standing€toÐ °  Ðappeal.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€1194„1196.)€€However,€de€facto€parents€are€not€entitled€as€aÐ °  Ðmatter€of€law€to€court„appointed€counsel€in€the€trial€court€or€on€appeal.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.Ð °  Ð1199.)а(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €{ ÔòòAllen€M.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1992)€6€Cal.App.4th€1069,€1074.€€Public€agency€is€notÐ ° Ðthe€only€party€whose€interest€is€affected€by€the€dismissal€of€a€dependency€petition.€Ð ° ÐWhen€the€agency€wishes€to€dismiss€a€petition€it€must€notify€all€interested€personsÐ ° Ðin€order€to€Ô_Ôafford€each€the€opportunity€to€object€and€be€heard.€€If€a€parent€or€minorÐ ° Ðdoes€object,€resolution€of€the€matter€is€properly€by€an€order€to€show€cause€hearingÐ ° Ðrequiring€the€agency€to€establish€why€the€petition€should€be€dismissed.€€AlthoughÐ ° Ðthe€court€may€accord€great€deference€to€the€agency's€expertise,€the€primary€focusÐ ° Ðof€the€court€is€the€determination€of€whether€dismissal€is€in€the€interests€of€justiceÐ ° Ðand€the€welfare€of€the€minor.€€On€that€basis€the€court€may€either€grant€the€dismissalÐ ° Ðor€order€the€agency€to€proceed€with€the€petition.а(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €3 ÔòòIn€re€Rachael€C.óó€(1991)€235€Cal.App.3d€1445€[disapproved€on€a€different€groundÐ ° Ðin€Ô €5 ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔKieshiaÔ_Ô€E.óó€(1993)€6€Cal.4th€68,€80].€€Party€denied€de€facto€parent€status€inÐ °  Ðdependency€proceedings€has€standing€to€appeal€from€that€denial.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1454.)€Ð °! ÐInsofar€as€it€may€be€interpreted€to€preclude€such€an€appeal,€rule€1435(b)€is,€to€thatÐ °" Ðextent,€void.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1455.)€€(Accord,€Ô €7 ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔHireniaÔ_Ô€C.óó€(1993)€18€Cal.App.4thÐ °# Ð504,€510€fn.€2.)а$ (#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €9 ÔòòIn€re€Sarah€M.óó€(1991)€233€Cal.App.3d€1486,€1503€[disapproved€on€another€pointÐ °&"" Ðin€Ô €; ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔChantalÔ_Ô€S.óó€(1996)€13€Cal.4th€196,€204].€€An€appellant€cannot€urge€errorsÐ °'## Ðwhich€affect€only€another€party€who€does€not€appeal.а($$(#(# ÐÌÔ  Ôà0  àÔ €= ÔòòIn€re€Elizabeth€M.óó€(1991)€232€Cal.App.3d€553,€565.€€On€appeal,€parent€has€right€toÐ °*&& Ðassert€child's€right€to€independent€counsel€in€dependency€proceedings.а+''(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €? ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔTomiÔ_Ô€C.óó€(1990)€218€Cal.App.3d€694.€€A€parent€is€not€aggrieved€by€orderÐ °-)) Ðdismissing€dependency€petition€without€adjudication€where€even€if€the€parentÐ ° Ðcould€have€successfully€defended€against€petition€allegations,€parent€could€notÐ ° Ðthereby€have€regained€custody€of€children€because€custody€issue€had€already€beenÐ ° Ðdecided€by€family€court.€€To€the€extent€the€Ô_ÔnoncustodialÔ_Ô€parent€believes€that€theÐ ° Ðcustodial€parent€is€unfit,€he€can€make€formal€application€for€initiation€of€sectionÐ ° Ð300€proceedings€under€section€329€and€rule€1405(e).а (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Ô_ÔJenelleÔ_Ô€C.óó€(1987)€197€Cal.App.3d€813,€818.€€On€appeal€from€orderÐ °  Ðterminating€parental€rights,€birth€mother€does€not€have€standing€to€argue€that€theÐ °  Ðservice€of€notice€to€the€birth€father€was€defective€because€birth€mother€is€notÐ °  Ðinjured€by€the€alleged€error.а (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Patricia€E.óó€(1985)€174€Cal.App.3d€1,€6.€€On€appeal€following€review€hearingÐ °  Ðcontinuing€child€a€dependent€of€the€juvenile€court,€parent€has€standing€to€raise€theÐ °  Ðissue€of€child's€right€to€self„representation.€€Independent€representation€of€child'sÐ ° Ðinterest€impacts€upon€parentððs€interest€in€parent„child€relationship.€€Where€theÐ ° Ðinterests€of€two€parties€interweave,€such€as€in€a€dependency€proceeding€where€theÐ ° Ðchild's€welfare€and€parent„child€relationship€are€intertwined€considerations,€eitherÐ ° Ðparty€has€first€party€standing€to€litigate€issues€that€impact€the€related€interests.а(#(# ÐÔ Ý ÝUÔÌÌòòÔ‡Xç¼XˆŠÐ×Ôà0  àIn€re€Ô_ÔRivaÔ_Ô€M.óó€(1991)€235€Cal.App.3d€403,€411,€fn.€6.€€Under€Indian€Child€Welfare€Act,€aÐ ° Ðnon„Indian€parent€of€an€Indian€child€has€standing€to€petition€to€invalidate€a€termination€ofÐ œì Ðparental€rights€in€proceedings€which€do€not€comply€with€the€Act's€provisions.ЈØ(#(# ÐÔ#†ŠÐ׈XX缃^#Ô