ÿWPCç? “'“}Û"E¬k§fAº­&n†bÏnŽyƒ¾‚£íý¿2è‘iÐ*Y›úíéË™çII¨B¬.ÄßX£ƒ/ïÔ-à1šÌòÍÚ¡ÈÔ âÁª_üÇŠÒŽýnÍ“ûúœ-K ^Z Þìçׯyù¸¬’>Jea,Ã2ì8s ²žÏ×÷æÛàCš+»àA‰WÆÐ믋ó4©5—ÀÈDèk-êj¯eÿpiãBPÝÏM`°1¦ß?æ¼í_°6%ç©;P„K^øªbo±Ùõp¶?yÃѶ•7ý2ÕëdÁ 4/ã?µÊ4ò»{Å÷“Þ ¢È•1CÝÆ€7ñJÜÞ‚TWHEV&³bkû•~a¢¤5‚… ¶¯ ÛŠ×ç“V?pýâLô­_ %ÉëÕN0X—´TÐá«!Ç-ˆÐgÀ<šç¸¿p®´ Rü!¸$£hj¦Tû˜¹Ã–Ï4cca[?œ °ž½TñÈiµBF­¦økÌ”´#¤›•ÞhŒ,û *Ó Õ‚<žäŸ.7NV¤[Sî_r¼0Ü*ÀLD–‰;dûáÎlT:ë‘êÌœÞO”pþ)v|¦;ƒ R«¹:n­” ›;SȪl-sEÝÎW¶^}Ž#ÉÄUN %Û 0(á 0C  0vLUFÂ^ w4,; m==============================================================TTTTTT LÕ Z!Š{ Zj_ RÉ P      Vk lÁ Á Á  X-!w…! Zü!zV"V"V" LÐ" T#ep#!Õ# Zö%îP& Z>'•˜' Z-(h‡( Zï(iI) Z²)i * * * Bu* Z’*xì* Zd+u¾+ Z3,w, Z-u^- ZÓ-t-.-.-. Z¡.vû.ñq/q/q/ Zb3t¼3 Z04uŠ4 Rÿ4ÿ4ÿ4 ZQ5‹«5 Z66•6 Z%7i7 Zè7zB8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8B8 Z¼8 Z9999999ip9 ZÙ9…3: Z¸:h;lz; Læ; Z2<yŒ< R= ZW=‹±= Z<>Š–> Z ? ?mz?˜HP LaserJet 1200 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡(ÿÿ$òòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó(-!2Vf$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÓÓ€€€€€òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó<¾½Q 9Z+‹.Courier New Regularæ©Ô.Ï €–.ÀáÀáÀáÀ y3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ wÝ ƒVf$ÝÓÓ€€€€€òòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡XÉ>XXXÔÔ#†Xò$XXXÉ>^#Ô€€Appellate€courts€have€called€upon€the€Legislature€to€authorize€writ€review€of€orders€otherÐ ° Ðthan€referrals€to€a€section€366.26.€€(See,€e.g.,€òòIn€re€Tania€R.óó€(1995)€32€Cal.App.4th€447,€451.)In re Matthew C. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 386SIn re Jennilee T. (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 21 €Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔJennileeÔ_Ô€T.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1992)€3€Cal.App.4th€212UIn re Rebecca H. (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 81 `Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Rebecca€H.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1991)€227€Cal.App.3d€825In re Lauren P. (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 76In re Tomi C. (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 694]In re Eli F. (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 2281 bÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Eli€F.óóÐ ° Ðà  àòòóó(1989)€212€Cal.App.3d€228aIn Daniel Z. (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 10091 mÔ_ÔòòIn€Daniel€Z.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1992)€10€Cal.App.4th€1009Cal.AppÔ_cIn re Cicely L. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 161 pÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Cicely€L.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1994)€28€Cal.App.4th€1697Cal.AppÔ_In re Matthew C. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 386hIn re Matthew C. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 3861 [Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Matthew€C.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1993)€6€Cal.4th€386 Ý ƒVf$ÝÓÓ€€€€€òòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡XÉ>XXXÔ€€Section€366.26,€subdivision€(l)(1)€effectively€abrogated€theÐ ° Ðholding€in€òòIn€re€Matthew€C.Ô €f Ôóó€(1993)€6€Cal.4th€386,€401,€whichÐ ¢ò L Ðinterpreted€former€section€366.26,€subdivision€(k)€to€permit,€onÐ ° Ðappeal€from€a€section€366.26€hearing,€review€of€findings€subsumedÐ †Ö Ðwithin€the€decision€to€set€a€section€366.26€hearing.kCheryl S. v. Superior Court (1996) ___ C1 äÔ_ÔòòCheryl€S.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€___€Cal.App.4th€___,Ìà  àprinted€on€December€20,€1996,Ìà  àin€96€Daily€Journal€Ô_ÔD.A.R.Ô_Ô€15153mCresse S. v. Superior Court (1996) 50 Ca1 ‹Ô_ÔòòÔ_ÔCresseÔ_Ô€S.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€50€Cal.App.4th€947oIn re Julie S. (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 9881 ^Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Julie€S.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€48€Cal.App.4th€988qIn re Edward H. (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 581 _Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Edward€H.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€43€Cal.App.4th€584sIn re Natasha A. (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 21 _Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Natasha€A.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€42€Cal.App.4th€28 dxJonathan M. v. Superior Court (1995) 39 1 nÔ_ÔòòJonathan€M.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€39€Cal.App.4th€1826zJoyce G. v. Superior Court (1995) 38 Cal1 kÔ_ÔòòJoyce€G.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€38€Cal.App.4th€1501|Roxanne H. v. Superior Court (1995) 35 C1 mÔ_ÔòòRoxanne€H.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€35€Cal.App.4th€1088~James B. v. Superior Court (1995) 35 Cal1 kÔ_ÔòòJames€B.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€35€Cal.App.4th€1014€Steve J. v. Superior Court (1995) 35 Cal1 jÔ_ÔòòSteve€J.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€35€Cal.App.4th€798„Ronald S. v. Superior Court (1995) 34 Ca1 lÔ_ÔòòRonald€S.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€34€Cal.App.4th€1467 çÝ ƒVf$ÝÓÓ€€€€€òòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€See,€òòIn€re€Sade€C.óó€(1996)€13€Cal.4th€952,€959€[court€conducted€independent€review€of€theÐ ° Ðrecord€is€not€required€and€need€not€nor€should€be€extended€to€apply€on€review€of€judgments€orÐ œì Ðorders€adversely€affecting€a€parent's€custody€of€a€child€or€status€as€the€child's€parent€whenÐ ˆØ Ðappointed€counsel€concludes€that€the€appeal€lacks€any€basis€in€law€or€fact];€òòIn€re€Sara€H.óó€(1997)Ð tÄ Ð52€Cal.App.4th€198,€201€[nothing€in€òòSade€C.óó€suggests€that,€in€the€absence€of€the€applicability€ofÐ `° Ðthe€òòÔ_ÔWendeÔ_Ôóó€procedure,€there€is€a€similar€discretionary€review€procedure€which€is€applicable€toÐ L œ Ðdependency€appeals€in€which€the€appointed€attorney€makes€no€assertions€of€error€in€his€or€herÐ 8 ˆ Ðopening€brief].Ô‡XÉ>XXXÔ‰Karl S. v. Superior Court (1995) 34 Cal.1 jÔ_ÔòòKarl€S.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€34€Cal.App.4th€1397‹Robin V. v. Superior Court (1995) 33 Cal1 kÔ_ÔòòRobin€V.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€33€Cal.App.4th€1158Guillermo G. v. Superior Court (1995) 33In re Rebekah R. (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 11 Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔRebekahÔ_Ô€R.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1994)€27€Cal.App.4th€1638’Rayna R. v. Superior Court (1993) 20 Cal1 ‹Ô_ÔòòÔ_ÔRaynaÔ_Ô€R.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1993)€20€Cal.App.4th€1398”In re Diana G. (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1461 _Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Diana€G.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1992)€10€Cal.App.4th€1468–In re Ronald V. (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 181 pÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Ronald€V.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1993)€13€Cal.App.4th€1803Cal.AppÔ_}In re Sheila B. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 181‚In re Precious J. (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1 _Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Sheila€B.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1993)€19€Cal.App.4th€187Wanda B. v. Superior Court (1996) 41 Cal1 {Ô_ÔòòWanda€B.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€41€Cal.App.4th€1391Cal.AppÔ_In re Tracy Z. (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 1072 ^Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Tracy€Z.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1987)€195€Cal.App.3d€107 bÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Precious€J.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1996)€42€Cal.App.4th€1463In re Matthew C. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 386…John F. v. Superior Court (1996) 43 Cal.1 oÔ_ÔòòJohn€F.€v.€Superior€CourtóóÐ ° Ðà  àòòóó(1996)€43€Cal.App.4th€400Joyce G. v. Superior Court (1995) 38 CalˆIn re Shaundra L. (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1 Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔShaundraÔ_Ô€L.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1995)€33€Cal.App.4th€303ŠIn re Moriah T. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 131 €Ô_ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔMoriahÔ_Ô€T.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1994)€23€Cal.App.4th€1367In re Catherine S. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d1 cÔ_ÔòòIn€re€Catherine€S.óóÐ ° Ðà  à(1991)€230€Cal.App.3d€1253Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà@uu!ìàò òòòAPPEALABLE€ORDERSó óóó׃K×Ý ƒÿÿÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׈Ð ° ÐÌÔ  Ôà  à(a)à0 ` àòòDISMISSAL€ORDERóóЈØ` (#` (# ÐÔ Ý ÄÔÌà0  àòòIn€re€LaurenÔ €V Ô€P.óó€(1996)€44€Cal.App.4th€763,€767„768.€€A€"judgment"€in€a€juvenileÐ `° Ðdependency€proceeding€"may€be€appealed€from€in€the€same€manner€as€any€final€judgmentÐ L œ Ð...."€€(ðð€395.)€€If€the€juvenile€court€dismisses€a€dependency€petition€based€onÐ 8 ˆ Ðinsufficiency€of€the€evidence,€the€dismissal€is€a€final€judgment€and€hence€appealable.€€AnÐ $ t Ðorder€of€dismissal€constitutes€a€judgment€for€all€purposes€and,€as€such,€is€generallyÐ  ` Ðappealable.€€Also,€such€a€dismissal€is€with€prejudice,€and€a€final€judgement€for€resÐ ü L  Ðjudicata€purposes.€€On€the€other€hand,€if€the€juvenile€court€dismisses€a€dependencyÐ è 8  Ðpetition€without€prejudice€and€without€ruling€on€the€merits,€the€dismissal€is€not€anÐ Ô$  Ðappealable€order.€€Juvenile€court's€characterization€of€its€order€dismissing€dependencyÐ À  Ðpetition€following€a€trial€on€issue€of€fact€as€a€dismissal€"without€prejudice"€is€notÐ ¬ü  Ðcontrolling€and€does€not€preclude€review€of€an€otherwise€appealable€order.Иè (#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €u ÔòòIn€re€Sheila€B.óó€(1993)€19€Cal.App.4th€187,€197.€€An€order€dismissing€a€dependencyÐ pÀ Ðpetition€after€a€contested€hearing€on€the€petition€allegations€is€a€dismissal€with€prejudiceÐ \¬ Ðand€is€appealable.ÐH˜(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Ô_ÔTomiÔ_ÔÔ €W Ô€C.óó€(1990)€218€Cal.App.3d€694,€698.€€Section€390€dismissal€of€petition€withoutÐ  p Ðprejudice€is€not€a€final,€appealable€judgment.€€Such€dismissals€do€not€involve€the€meritsÐ  \ Ðof€the€allegations;€hence,€another€section€300€petition€could€be€filed€alleging€the€sameÐ øH Ðacts.€€Further,€where€petitioner€requests€dismissal€of€the€petition,€the€voluntary€dismissalÐ ä4 Ðis€not€appealable€unless€the€objector€is€aggrieved€thereby.ÐÐ (#(# ÐÌÔ  Ôà  à(b)à0 ` àòòDISPOSITIONAL€ORDERóóШø` (#` (# ÐÔ Ý X ÔÌÔ  Ôà0  àòòIn€re€Ô_ÔMerandaÔ_Ô€P.óó€(1997)€56€Cal.App.4th€1143,€1150;€Ô €\ ÔòòIn€re€Eli€F.óó€(1989)€212€Cal.App.3dÐ €Ð Ð228,€233.€€In€a€dependency€proceeding,€the€dispositional€order€constitutes€the€judgmentÐ l¼ Ðfor€purposes€of€section€395.ÐX ¨(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €~ ÔòòWanda€B.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1996)€41€Cal.App.4th€1391,€1395„1396.€€A€dispositionalÐ 0"€  Ðorder€denying€reunification€services,€unaccompanied€by€a€simultaneous€order€setting€aÐ #l! Ðsection€366.26€hearing,€is€immediately€appealable€and,€therefore,€not€reviewable€onÐ $X" Ðappeal€from€the€judgment€at€the€section€366.26€hearing.Ðô$D #(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €` ÔòòIn€re€Daniel€Z.óó€(1992)€10€Cal.App.4th€1009,€1017.€€Where€a€timely€notice€of€appealÐ Ì&"% Ðspecifies€the€jurisdictional€finding€instead€of€the€dispositional€order,€liberal€constructionÐ ¸'#& Ðof€the€notice€of€appeal€as€properly€specifying€the€dispositional€order€is€appropriate.Ф(ô#'(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €€ ÔòòIn€re€Tracy€Z.óó€(1987)€195€Cal.App.3d€107,€112.€€Jurisdictional€findings€are€not€appealableÐ |*Ì%) Ðorders.€€They€are€only€reviewable€on€a€timely€appeal€from€the€dispositional€orders.а(#(# ÐÌà  à(c)à0 ` àòòLONG€TERM€FOSTER€CAREóóЈØ` (#` (# ÐÔ Ý Ì ÔÌà0  àÔ €b ÔòòIn€re€Cicely€L.óó€(1994)€28€Cal.App.4th€1697.€€Any€portion€of€a€subsequent€order,€i.e.,€afterÐ `° Ðthe€final€judgment€at€the€disposition€hearing,€which€is€challenged€on€grounds€designed€toÐ L œ Ðoverturn€the€setting€of€the€section€366.26€hearing€is€not€appealable;€any€portion€of€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðorder€which€is€challenged€on€grounds€not€designed€to€overturn€the€setting€of€the€sectionÐ $ t Ð366.26€hearing€is€appealable.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1704.)€€A€finding€at€12„month€review€hearing€thatÐ  ` Ðreasonable€reunification€efforts€had€been€made€and€order€terminating€reunificationÐ ü L  Ðservices€are€immediately€appealable€where€permanent€plan€of€long„term€foster€care€isÐ è 8  Ðselected€at€that€hearing€and€cannot€be€challenged€on€appeal€from€a€later€order€terminatingÐ Ô$  Ðparental€rights.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1705.)€ÐÀ (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€John€F.óó€(1994)€27€Cal.App.4th€1365,€1374,€fn.€4.€€To€be€distinguished€are€ordersÐ ˜è  Ðcontemporaneous€to€an€order€setting€a€section€366.26€hearing,€and€orders,€that€bypass€theÐ „Ô  Ðsection€366.26€hearing€and€select€long„term€foster€care€as€the€minor's€permanent€plan.€Ð pÀ ÐThe€latter€are€final€and€appealable€under€section€395€as€orders€subsequent€to€a€judgmentÐ \¬ Ðof€dependency€because€nothing€further€is€required€to€establish€the€permanent€plan.€€(SeeÐ H˜ Ðalso,€òòIn€re€Dustin€R.óó€(1997)€54€Cal.App.4th€1131,€1138.)Ð4„(#(# ÐÌÔ  Ôà  à(d)à0 ` àòòREFERRAL€ORDERSóóÐ \` (#` (# ÐÌà  àà ` à(1)à0 ¸ àòòFormer€Section€366.26,€subdivision€(k)óóÐä4¸ (#¸ (# ÐÔ Ý ÔÌà0  àÔ €g ÔòòIn€re€Matthew€C.óó€(1993)€6€Cal.4th€386,€401.€€Within€section€366.26,€subdivision€(k),€noÐ ¼  Ðexpress€or€implied€legislative€intent€to€abrogate€appellate€review€of€the€issues€subsumedÐ ¨ø Ðwithin€an€order€terminating€reunification€services€and€setting€a€selection€andÐ ”ä Ðimplementation€hearing€is€discernible.€€While€subdivision€(k)€abrogates€"interim€appeals"Ð €Ð Ðfrom€orders€terminating€reunification€services€and€setting€a€section€366.26€hearing,Ð l¼ Ðfindings€subsumed€within€such€orders€remain€reviewable€on€appeal€from€the€final€orderÐ X ¨ Ðmade€at€the€section€366.26€hearing.ÐD!”(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €v ÔòòIn€re€Precious€J.óó€(1996)€42€Cal.App.4th€1463,€1473„1474.€€With€respect€to€ordersÐ #l! Ðterminating€reunification€services€and€setting€the€366.26€hearing€entered€prior€to€JanuaryÐ $X" Ð1,€1995,€under€the€authority€of€òòMatthew€C.Ô €ƒ Ôóó,€both€orders€and€the€findings€which€resulted€inÐ ô$D # Ðthose€orders,€including€all€review€hearing€findings€on€the€adequacy€of€the€reunificationÐ à%0!$ Ðservices,€are€cognizable€on€appeal€from€order€terminating€parental€rights.ÐÌ&"%(#(# ÐÌÔ  Ôà  àà ` à(2)à0 ¸ àòòSection€366.26,€subdivision€(l)(1)óó:€€Referral€orders€entered€after€January€1,Ð ¤(ô#' Ð1995,€are€not€appealable€unless€a€timely€writ€petition€has€been€filed€andÐ )à$( Ðeither€summarily€denied€or€otherwise€not€decided€on€the€merits.׃i×Ý ƒÿÿÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð|*Ì%)¸ (#¸ (# ÐÔ_ÔÔ Ý -ÔÌà  àà ` àÔ  Ôà ¸ àa.à0  àòòWrit€Procedure€Under€Section€366.26€(l)(1)€and€Rule€39.1BóóМì(#(# Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àÌà0  àòòIn€re€DeJohn€B.óó€(2000)€84€Cal.App.4th€100,€109.€€Where€notice€is€not€attempted€ofÐ tÄ Ðsection€366.21,€subdivision€(e)€review€hearing€at€which€case€is€referred€to€section€366.26Ð `° Ðhearing,€rule€39.1B€writ€advisement€is€mailed€to€an€invalid€address,€and€notice€defect€isÐ L œ Ðraised€at€section€366.26€hearing,€notice€defect€is€cognizable€on€appeal€from€orderÐ 8 ˆ Ðterminating€parental€rights.Ð$ t(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Maria€S.óó€(2000)€82€Cal.App.4th€1032,€1038.€€Claims€of€error€relating€toÐ ü L  Ðreunification€services€are€cognizable€on€appeal€from€order€terminating€parental€rightsÐ è 8  Ðwhere€juvenile€court€failed€to€advise€parent€of€her€right€to€writ€review€to€challengeÐ Ô$  Ðtermination€of€reunification€services€and€setting€of€the€section€366.26€hearing.ÐÀ (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòGlen€C.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(2000)€78€Cal.App.4th€570,€577„584.€€Inadequacies€in€a€ruleÐ ˜è  Ð39.1B€petition€may€affect€not€only€the€resolution€of€the€petition€itself€but€also€the€parentððsÐ „Ô  Ðright€to€appeal€from€the€order€following€the€section€366.26€hearing.€€Section€366.26,Ð pÀ Ðsubdivision€(l),€provides:€€ð ð(1)€An€order€by€the€court€that€a€hearing€pursuant€to€thisÐ \¬ Ðsection€be€held€is€not€appealable€at€any€time€unless€all€of€the€following€applies:€[ðð](A)€AÐ H˜ Ðpetition€for€extraordinary€writ€review€was€filed€in€a€timely€manner.€[ðð](B)€The€petitionÐ 4„ Ðsubstantively€addressed€the€specific€issues€to€be€challenged€and€supported€that€challengeÐ  p Ðby€an€adequate€record.€[ðð](C)€The€petition€for€extraordinary€writ€review€was€summarilyÐ  \ Ðdenied€or€otherwise€not€decided€on€the€merits.€€[ðð](2)€Failure€to€file€a€petition€forÐ øH Ðextraordinary€writ€review€within€the€period€specified€by€rule,€to€substantively€address€theÐ ä4 Ðspecific€issues€challenged,€or€to€support€that€challenge€by€an€adequate€record€shallÐ Ð  Ðpreclude€subsequent€review€by€appeal€of€the€findings€and€orders€made€pursuant€to€thisÐ ¼  Ðsection.ðð€€Rule€39.1B(d)€similarly€provides€that€ð ð[t]he€findings€and€orders€of€the€juvenileÐ ¨ø Ðcourt€in€setting€a€hearingðð€under€section€366.26€may€be€reviewed€on€appeal€only€if€(1)€aÐ ”ä Ðtimely€writ€petition€was€filed,€and€(2)€the€petition€was€ð ðsummarily€denied€or€otherwiseÐ €Ð Ðnot€decided€on€the€merits.ðð€€Additionally,€this€subdivision€of€the€rule€states€that€ð ð[r]eviewÐ l¼ Ðon€appeal€of€the€order€setting€a€hearing€under€section€366.26€is€limited€to€issues€raised€inÐ X ¨ Ða€previous€petition€for€extraordinary€writ€that€were€supported€by€an€adequate€record.ððÐD!”(#(# ÐÌà0  àBare„bones€petitions€present€the€reviewing€court€with€several€options,€each€problematicÐ #l! Ðfor€different€reasons.€€Some€courts€have€taken€the€view€that€a€procedurally€inadequateÐ $X" Ðpetition€ð"ð€one€that€does€not€comply€with€the€requirements€of€rule€39.1B(j)€ð"ð€should€beÐ ô$D # Ðdismissed€or€summarily€denied.€€Some€courts€have€further€opted€for€summary€denial€onÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€merits€of€petitions€that€are€procedurally€adequate€but€fail€to€present€meaningfulÐ Ì&"% Ðargument,€if€the€reviewing€court€does€not€find€that€the€issue€raised€by€the€petition€isÐ ¸'#& Ðarguable.€€That€often€would€allow€a€subsequent€appeal.€€Another€alternative€open€to€aÐ ¤(ô#' Ðreviewing€court€is€to€require€or€offer€the€option€to€counsel€to€correct€deficient€petitions€byÐ )à$( Ðfiling€amended€petitions.€€Finally,€a€reviewing€court€might€overlook€the€deficiencies€in€aÐ ° Ðpetition€and€independently€review€the€record.€€However,€independent€review€wouldÐ œì Ðimpose€an€extraordinary€burden€on€the€courts€and€is€not€required€by€either€constitutionalÐ ˆØ Ðprinciple€or€policy€for€appeals€from€orders€adversely€affecting€child€custody€or€parentalÐ tÄ Ðstatus.Ð`°(#(# ÐÌà0  àSummary€denial€or€dismissal€of€a€procedurally€inadequate€petition€punishes€the€parent€forÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€failure€of€counsel€to€adequately€perform€his€or€her€professional€responsibilities.€Ð $ t ÐNeither€section€366.26€nor€rule€39.1B,€however,€ò òòòrequireóóó ó€that€all€petitions€be€decided€onÐ  ` Ðthe€merits.€€On€the€contrary,€both€expressly€recognize€the€possibility€of€summary€denial€inÐ ü L  Ðtheir€provision€that€the€trial€courtððs€orders€in€setting€the€section€366.26€hearing€may€beÐ è 8  Ðreviewed€on€appeal€after€that€hearing€only€if,€among€other€things,€the€ð ðpetition€forÐ Ô$  Ðextraordinary€writ€review€was€summarily€denied€or€otherwise€not€decided€on€the€merits.ðð€Ð À  Ð(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(l)(1)(C);€rule€39.1B(d)(2).)Ьü (#(# ÐÌà0  àIt€is€incumbent€upon€counsel€who€participate€in€dependency€cases€to€advocate€theirÐ „Ô  Ðclientsðð€positions€fully€and€effectively.€€This€does€not€mean€that€counsel€should€file€a€ruleÐ pÀ Ð39.1B€petition€in€every€case,€or€in€every€case€in€which€the€client€has€filed€a€notice€ofÐ \¬ Ðintent€to€file€such€a€petition.€€To€the€contrary,€an€attorney€is€required€to€maintain€onlyÐ H˜ Ðsuch€actions€or€proceedings€ð ðas€appear€to€him€or€her€legal€or€just.ðð€€(Bus.€&€Prof.€Code,€ððÐ 4„ Ð6068,€subd.€(c);€see€Rules€Prof.€Conduct,€rule€3„200.)€€When€a€rule€39.1B€petition€is€filed,Ð  p Ðhowever,€it€is€the€obligation€of€the€attorney€to€comply€with€section€366.26,€rule€39.1B€andÐ  \ Ðcase€law€describing€the€requirements€for€an€adequate€petition.ÐøH(#(# ÐÌà0  àAlthough€the€parent,€him€or€herself,€files€a€petition€for€extraordinary€writ,€counsel€is€notÐ Ð  Ðrequired€to€follow€through€with€the€petition€itself€if€counsel€believes€the€petition€has€noÐ ¼  Ðarguable€merit.€€In€light€of€the€obligation€imposed€upon€attorneys€by€Business€andÐ ¨ø ÐProfessions€Code€section€6068,€subdivision€(c),€not€to€maintain€actions€that€do€not€appearÐ ”ä Ðð ðlegal€or€just,ðð€the€filing€of€a€rule€39.1B€petition€by€counsel€informs€this€court€thatÐ €Ð Ðcounsel€believes€the€issues€presented€ò òòòareóóó ó€ð ðlegal€or€just.ðð€€A€petition€that€the€attorney€didÐ l¼ Ðnot€believe€to€be€ð ðlegal€or€justðð€would€violate€the€attorneyððs€professional€obligation€andÐ X ¨ Ðwould€be€frivolous.ÐD!”(#(# ÐÌà0  àStrong€measures€are€necessary€to€assure€parents€in€dependency€cases€receive€properÐ #l! Ðrepresentation€in€rule€39.1B€writ€proceedings.€€As€has€been€stated,€when€an€attorneyÐ $X" Ðevaluates€a€case€and€determines€there€is€no€potentially€meritorious€issue€to€be€raised,€aÐ ô$D # Ðpetition€for€extraordinary€writ€simply€should€not€be€filed.€€In€order€to€impress€uponÐ à%0!$ Ðcounsel€the€importance€of€adequate€presentation€of€writ€petitions€that€are€filed,€the€FirstÐ Ì&"% ÐAppellate€District€will,€in€the€future,€summarily€deny€petitions€that€fail€to€comply€withÐ ¸'#& Ðthe€requirements€of€section€366.26€and€rule€39.1B€as€well€as€to€take€appropriate€stepsÐ ¤(ô#' Ð(e.g.,€report€the€conduct€to€the€trial€court€or€State€Bar€or€initiate€sanction€proceedings,€ifÐ )à$( Ðappropriate)€to€deter€violations.Ð|*Ì%)(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Rashad€B.óó€(1999)€76€Cal.App.4th€442.€€Contentions€designed€to€overturn€a€referralÐ T,¤'+ Ðorder€are€not€cognizable€on€appeal€unless€writ€review€was€sought,€even€if€the€contentionÐ @-(, Ðrelates€only€to€contemporaneous€orders€which€would€otherwise€be€appealable.€€ForÐ ° Ðexample,€if€a€parent€is€denied€reunification€services€pursuant€to€section€361.5,€subdivisionÐ œì Ð(b)(10)(A)€and€the€cause€is€referred€for€a€section€366.26€hearing,€at€disposition,€claims€(1)Ð ˆØ Ðthat€the€refereeððs€dispositional€order€removing€the€children€from€parental€custody€isÐ tÄ Ðinvalid€for€lack€of€a€judgeððs€signature;€(2)€that€the€petition€failed€to€state€a€cause€of€action;Ð `° Ð(3)€that€the€jurisdictional€and€dispositional€findings€were€not€supported€by€substantialÐ L œ Ðevidence;€and€(4)€that€removal€of€appointed€trial€counsel€at€the€conclusion€of€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðdisposition€hearing€was€error,€as€well€as€the€referral€order€itself,€are€not€cognizable€onÐ $ t Ðappeal€unless€rule€39.1B€writ€review€has€been€sought.€€However,€where€the€court€fails€toÐ  ` Ðgive€a€party€notice€of€writ€review,€the€partyððs€claims€are€not€limited€by€the€provisions€ofÐ ü L  Ðthe€court€rules€or€statutes.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€447„448.)Ðè 8 (#(# ÐÌà0  àWhere€a€parent€is€not€present€at€the€hearing€where€the€juvenile€court€entered€the€referralÐ À  Ðorder,€the€court€is€required€to€mail€notice€to€the€partyððs€last€known€address.€€Pursuant€toÐ ¬ü  Ðsection€316.1,€the€court€is€required€to€order€the€parent€to€provide€a€permanent€mailingÐ ˜è  Ðaddress€and€to€admonish€the€parent€that€the€permanent€mailing€address€will€be€used€forÐ „Ô  Ðnotice€purposes€unless€the€parent€notifies€the€court€or€social€services€agency€in€writing€ofÐ pÀ Ðnew€mailing€address.€€The€courtððs€admonishment€of€the€parentððs€duty€to€notify€his€or€herÐ \¬ Ðattorney€and€social€worker€of€any€change€in€address€and€that€the€failure€to€do€so€can€resultÐ H˜ Ðin€the€failure€to€receive€important€notices€does€not€constitute€substantial€compliance€withÐ 4„ Ðsection€316.1€and€rule€1412(l).€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€448„450.)Ð p(#(# ÐÌ€à0  àWhere€it€has€not€complied€with€section€316.1€and€rule€1412(l)€the€courtððs€failure€to€sentÐ øH Ðwritten€notice€of€the€referral€order€to€the€parent€is€not€excused€by€the€fact€that€the€parentÐ ä4 Ðis€homeless.€€A€permanent€mailing€address,€designated€for€purposes€of€receiving€notices,Ð Ð  Ðneed€not€be€the€address€at€which€a€parent€is€actually€residing.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€450.)м (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Anthony€B.óó€(1999)€72€Cal.App.4th€1017,€1021„1024.€€Any€order,€regardless€of€itsÐ ”ä Ðnature,€made€at€the€hearing€at€which€the€juvenile€court€enters€an€order€setting€a€sectionÐ €Ð Ð366.26€hearing€is€a€nonappealable€order,€subject€to€writ€review€only€under€section€366.26,Ð l¼ Ðsubdivision€(l)(1).€€Specifically,€order€denying€parentððs€388€petition€for€visitation€issuedÐ X ¨ Ðcontemporaneously€with€setting€order€is€subject€to€writ€review€only.ÐD!”(#(# ÐÌòòà0  àIn€re€Casey€D.óó€(1999)€70€Cal.App.4th€38,€46„47.€€Arguments€previously€raised€by€parentsÐ #l! Ðin€a€rule€39.1B€writ€petition€and€denied€on€the€merits€may€not€be€raised€again€on€appealÐ $X" Ðfrom€order€terminating€parental€rights.€€Ðô$D #(#(# ÐÔ Ý ÔÌà0  àòòIn€re€Cathina€W.óó€(1998)€68€Cal.App.4th€716.€€Juvenile€courtððs€failure€to€discharge€its€dutyÐ Ì&"% Ðto€give€parent€timely,€correct€notice€of€the€entry€of€the€order€setting€the€366.26€hearingÐ ¸'#& Ðconstitutes€good€cause€for€parentððs€failure€to€file€a€notice€of€intent€and€request€for€recordÐ ¤(ô#' Ðand€a€writ€petition€pursuant€to€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l)€and€rule€39.1B.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.Ð )à$( Ð722.)€Ð|*Ì%)(#(# ÐÌà0  àAll€of€the€time€standards€in€rule€39.1B€are€mandatory.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€724„725.)€€DependingÐ T,¤'+ Ðupon€the€circumstances€of€the€individual€case,€isolated€or€infrequent€failures€by€theÐ @-(, Ðjuvenile€court€to€meet€the€requirements€of€rule€39.1B€will€simply€require€the€appellateÐ ° Ðcourt€to€dispose€of€the€case€as€promptly€as€possible€or€permit€the€parent€to€raise€theÐ œì Ðpropriety€of€the€setting€order€on€appeal€from€the€termination€order.€€However,€persistentÐ ˆØ Ðor€repeated€violations€by€the€juvenile€court€of€the€duties€imposed€upon€it€by€the€statuteÐ tÄ Ðand€the€rule€might€call€for€sterner€measures€calculated€to€compel€the€juvenile€court€toÐ `° Ðdischarge€its€mandatory€duties€under€the€statute€and€the€rule.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€726.)ÐL œ(#(# ÐÌà0  àParentððs€right€to€appellate€review€of€the€merits€of€the€setting€order€is€not€conditionedÐ $ t Ðupon€a€showing€he€or€she€was€prejudiced€by€the€juvenile€courtððs€failure€to€serve€a€correctÐ  ` Ðand€timely€rule€39.1B(f)€notice.€€No€purpose€would€be€served€by€imposing€such€aÐ ü L  Ðcondition€because€a€determination€that€the€setting€order€was€prejudicial€error€obviouslyÐ è 8  Ðrequires€an€evaluation€of€the€merits€of€the€order.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€724.)ÐÔ$ (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Charmice€G.óó€(1998)€66€Cal.App.4th€659.€€Although€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l)Ð ¬ü  Ðsets€forth€the€conditions€which€permit€a€party€to€contest€by€appeal€an€order€setting€a€.26Ð ˜è  Ðhearing,€it€does€not€specify€when€a€party€should€appeal€if€those€enabling€conditions€haveÐ „Ô  Ðbeen€met.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€666.)€€However,€the€legislative€history€demonstrates€the€LegislatureððsÐ pÀ Ðintent€to€prohibit€interim€appeals€from€referral€orders€or€orders€setting€a€.26€hearing,€evenÐ \¬ Ðif€all€the€conditions€for€review€by€appeal€specified€in€subdivision€(l)€have€been€satisfied.€Ð H˜ ÐIn€other€words,€a€party€must€wait€to€attack€the€referral€order€on€a€later€appeal€from€theÐ 4„ Ðorder€entered€at€the€.26€hearing.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€666„668.)€€Further,€subdivision€(l)€alsoÐ  p Ðapplies€to€collateral€orders€which€are€ð ðintegrally€relatedðð€to€the€referral€order€and€issuedÐ  \ Ðcontemporaneously€with€that€order.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€669„670.)€ÐøH(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Baby€Boy€H.óó€(1998)€63€Cal.App.4th€470,€474.€€Dispositional€order€denyingÐ Ð  Ðreunification€services€which€is€not€accompanied€by€a€simultaneous€order€setting€a€sectionÐ ¼  Ð366.26€hearing€is€appealable.Шø(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòAnthony€D.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1998)€63€Cal.App.4th€149.€€Ð€Ð(#(# Ðà0  à[1]€€When€services€are€denied€to€both€parents€at€the€dispositional€hearing,€all€challengesÐ l¼ Ðto€the€dispositional€judgement€and€underlying€jurisdictional€findings€must€be€brought€byÐ X ¨ Ðwrit€because€all€such€challenges,€with€one€possible€exception,€are€designed€to€overturnÐ D!” Ðthe€referral€order.€€Because€all€orders€denying€services€require€jurisdiction€and€out€ofÐ 0"€  Ðhome€placement,€any€successful€attack€on€jurisdiction€or€the€finding€of€detriment€toÐ #l! Ðreturn€the€child€to€his€or€her€home€would€result€in€reversal€of€the€denial€of€services,Ð $X" Ðwhich,€in€turn,€would€result€in€the€reversal€of€the€order€setting€the€section€366.26€hearing.€Ð ô$D # Ð(òòId.óó,€at€p.€156.)Ðà%0!$(#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€one€possible€exception€is€an€appeal€from€a€dispositional€judgment€where€servicesÐ ¸'#& Ðwere€denied€to€both€parents€and€the€matter€was€referred€to€a€permanency€hearing,€but€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðonly€issue€on€appeal€is€an€attack€on€the€visitation€order.€€(òòIbid.óó)Ð)à$((#(# ÐÌà0  à[2]€€Section€366.26,€subdivision€(l)€sets€out€three€conditions€for€the€appealability€of€aÐ h+¸&* Ðreferral€order:€€a€petition€challenging€the€order€must€be€timely€filed,€it€must€be€summarilyÐ T,¤'+ Ðdenied,€and€it€must€"substantively€address€the€specified€issues€to€be€challenged€andÐ @-(, Ðsupport€that€challenge€by€an€adequate€record."€€The€last„mentioned€condition€is€amplifiedÐ ° Ðin€rule€39.1B(j):€€"The€petition€for€extraordinary€writ€shall€summarize€the€factual€basis€forÐ œì Ðthe€petition.€€Petitioner€need€not€repeat€facts€as€they€appear€in€any€attached€or€submittedÐ ˆØ Ðrecord,€provided,€however,€that€references€to€specific€portions€of€the€record,€theirÐ tÄ Ðsignificance€to€the€grounds€alleged,€and€disputed€aspects€of€the€record€will€assist€theÐ `° Ðreviewing€court€and€shall€be€noted.€€Petitioner€shall€attach€applicable€points€andÐ L œ Ðauthorities€.€.€."€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€157.)Ð8 ˆ(#(# ÐÌà0  àTimely€filed€writ€petition€which€contains€no€specific€legal€or€factual€support€for€theÐ  ` Ðallegations€is€appropriately€denied€summarily€foreclosing€subsequent€appeal€of€referralÐ ü L  Ðorder.€€(òòIbid.óó)€€Ðè 8 (#(# ÐÌà0  àòòMaribel€M.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1998)€61€Cal.App.4th€1469.€€Effective€January€1,€1998,Ð À  Ðthe€Judicial€Council€amended€rule€39.1B€to€modify€subdivisions€(l)€and€(o)€to€provide,€inÐ ¬ü  Ðpertinent€part:€Ð˜è (#(# ÐÒ°ÒÌà0  àà0` Ð Ð àð ðIn€all€cases€in€which€the€court€intends€to€issue€a€determination€on€theÐ pÀ Ðmerits,€the€court€shall€issue€an€Order€to€Show€Cause€or€an€AlternativeÐ \¬ ÐWrit[,]ðð€and€ð ð[a]bsent€exceptional€circumstances€the€appellate€court€shallÐ H˜ Ðreview€the€petition€for€extraordinary€writ€and€decide€it€on€the€merits€byÐ 4„ Ðwritten€opinion.ðð€Ð p` Ð ` Ð  ÐÒ°eÒÌà0  àThe€purpose€of€these€amendments€is€to€preclude€summary€denial€on€the€merits€by€courtsÐ øH Ðof€appeal€of€rule€39.1B€writ€petitions.€€That€purpose€conflicts€with€section€366.26,€whichÐ ä4 Ðpermits€summary€denial€of€certain€substantively€deficient€rule€39.1B€writ€petitions.€€(òòId.óó,Ð Ð  Ðat€pp.€1473„1476.)м (#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€Judicial€Counsel€may€only€make€rules€which€are€consistent€with€statutes.€€BecauseÐ ”ä Ðthey€are€inconsistent€with€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l),€the€amendments€to€rule€39.1BÐ €Ð Ð(l)€and€(o)€are€unconstitutional.€€However,€they€are€severable€from€the€remainder€of€ruleÐ l¼ Ð39.1B.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€1476„1477.)€€ÐX ¨(#(# ÐÌà0  àòòSue€E.€v.€Superior€Court€(Los€Angeles€County)óó€(1997)€54€Cal.App.4th€399.€€There€is€noÐ 0"€  Ðrequirement€that€a€party€must€file€a€writ€petition€challenging€the€juvenile€court's€decisionÐ #l! Ðto€set€a€section€366.26€hearing€in€order€to€preserve€the€right€to€appeal€from€matters€whichÐ $X" Ðmay€later€occur€during,€or€in€connection€with,€the€366.26€hearing.Ðô$D #(#(# ÐÌà0  àA€literal€reading€of€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l)(2)€is€susceptible€to€interpretation€aÐ Ì&"% Ðparent€must€petition€for€an€extraordinary€writ€prior€to€a€section€366.26€hearing,€or€will€beÐ ¸'#& Ðdenied€subsequent€review€by€appeal€of€any€irregularities€which€may€occur€during,€or€inÐ ¤(ô#' Ðconnection€with,€the€section€366.26€hearing.Ð)à$((#(# ÐÌà0  àSection€366.26,€subdivision€(l)(2),€properly€construed,€precludes€subsequent€review€onÐ h+¸&* Ðappeal€only€of€the€decision€to€set€a€section€366.26€hearing,€unless€a€writ€petitionÐ T,¤'+ Ðchallenging€the€order€setting€such€hearing€is€timely€filed.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€405.)Ð@-(,(#(# Їà0  àWhere€record€clearly€shows€the€reunification€services€were€sufficient€and€return€of€a€childÐ ° Ðto€the€parent€would€be€detrimental,€counsel€is€not€required€to€file€a€writ€petition€inÐ œì Ðproviding€adequate€representation€to€a€parent.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€404.)ЈØ(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €j ÔòòCheryl€S.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1996)€51€Cal.App.4th€1000,€1003„1005.€€Appellate€court'sÐ `° Ðduty€to€closely€review€a€rule€39.1B€petition€and€its€supporting€record€for€reversible€errorÐ L œ Ðdoes€not€relieve€the€petitioner's€attorney€from€meeting€his€obligation€to€present€anÐ 8 ˆ Ðadequate€record,€argument,€and€points€and€authorities.€€D.C.F.S.€is€under€no€obligation€toÐ $ t Ðdo€the€petitioner's€work.€€The€fact€that€the€attorney€is€appointed€by€the€court€and€paid€aÐ  ` Ðflat€fee€is,€of€course,€irrelevant€„„€if€he€deems€the€fee€inadequate,€he€need€not€accept€theÐ ü L  Ðappointment.€€Henceforth,€Division€One€of€the€Second€District€Court€of€Appeal€willÐ è 8  Ðdismiss€as€inadequate€any€rule€39.1B€petition€that€does€not€(1)€summarize€the€particularÐ Ô$  Ðfactual€bases€supporting€the€petition,€(2)€refer€to€specific€portions€of€the€record,€(3)€relateÐ À  Ðthe€facts€to€the€grounds€alleged€as€error,€(4)€note€disputed€aspects€of€the€record,€and€(5)Ð ¬ü  Ðhave€attached€to€it€a€particularized€memorandum€of€points€and€authorities.Иè (#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €l ÔòòCresse€S.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1996)€50€Cal.App.4th€947,€955„956.€€Rule€39.1B€does€notÐ pÀ Ðpermit€an€appellate€court€to€deny€a€petition€for€writ€of€mandate€on€technical€grounds.€€TheÐ \¬ Ðrule's€mandate,€however,€does€not€relieve€an€attorney€from€his€or€her€obligation€toÐ H˜ Ðprovide€the€appellate€court€with€(1)€an€adequate€record€and€a€petition€containing€citationsÐ 4„ Ðto€the€record€and€(2)€points€and€authorities€in€support€of€the€arguments€presented.€€WhenÐ  p Ðthe€case€has€any€merit,€the€attorney€is€required,€regardless€of€the€compensationÐ  \ Ðarrangement€„„€to€prepare€a€sufficient€petition.€€Failure€to€do€so€will€result€in€the€dismissalÐ øH Ðof€the€petition€as€abandoned€in€Division€Two€of€the€Second€District€Court€of€Appeal.Ðä4(#(# ÐÌà0  àSome€attorneys€may€believe€that€they€will€be€accused€of€proving€inadequateÐ ¼  Ðrepresentation€should€they€fail€to€file€a€petition€for€writ€of€mandate€under€rule€39.1B.€Ð ¨ø ÐHowever,€where€the€record€clearly€indicates€that€the€reunification€services€were€adequate,Ð ”ä Ðcounsel€is€not€obligated€to€file€a€petition€for€writ€of€mandate.ЀÐ(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €n ÔòòIn€re€Julie€S.óó€(1996)€48€Cal.App.4th€988.€€As€a€matter€of€statutory€law,€an€appeal€from€anÐ X ¨ Ðorder€setting€a€section€366.26€hearing€is€only€available€if€a€petition€for€an€extraordinaryÐ D!” Ðwrit€challenging€the€order€was€filed€and€was€summarily€denied€or€otherwise€not€decidedÐ 0"€  Ðon€the€merits.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€990.)€€Ð#l!(#(# ÐÌà0  àWhere€(1)€parent€files€a€petition€for€an€extraordinary€writ€pursuant€to€subdivision€(l)(1)€ofÐ ô$D # Ðsection€366.26,€and€rule€39.1B,€challenging€the€findings€and€order€setting€the€hearingÐ à%0!$ Ðconcerning€the€adoption;€and€(2)€court€issues€an€order€to€show€cause,€affords€the€partiesÐ Ì&"% Ðan€opportunity€to€fully€brief€and€to€orally€argue€the€cause,€and€issues€a€written€opinion€onÐ ¸'#& Ðthe€merits,€the€order€setting€the€section€366.26€hearing€is€not€appealable€following€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðorder€terminating€parental€rights€pursuant€to€section€366.26.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€991.)Ð)à$((#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €p ÔòòIn€re€Edward€H.óó€(1996)€43€Cal.App.4th€584,€590„591.€€Order€selecting€adoption€asÐ h+¸&* Ðpermanent€plan€for€minors€but€continuing€section€366.26€hearing€for€identification€ofÐ T,¤'+ Ðprospective€adoptive€family€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(c)(3))€is€an€appealable,€interlocutory€order.Ð@-(,(#(# Їà0  àÔ €„ ÔòòJohn€F.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1996)€43€Cal.App.4th€400,€406,€fn.€3,€citing€òòJoyce€G.Ô €† Ô€v.Ð ° ÐSuperior€Courtóó€(1995)€38€Cal.App.4th€1501,€1507„1508,€fn.€3.€€The€failure€to€file€a€writÐ œì Ðpetition€challenging€the€findings€made€at€a€hearing€at€which€the€matter€is€set€for€a€sectionÐ ˆØ Ð366.26€hearing€only€precludes€raising€issues€regarding€those€findings€upon€an€appealÐ tÄ Ðfrom€the€order€at€the€section€366.26€hearing;€it€does€not€also€preclude€the€appeal€of€anÐ `° Ðorder€terminating€parental€rights€entered€at€the€section€366.26€hearing.ÐL œ(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €r ÔòòIn€re€Natasha€A.óó€(1996)€42€Cal.App.4th€28,€33„34.€€A€visitation€order€is€separatelyÐ $ t Ðappealable€even€if€issued€in€conjunction€with€the€setting€of€a€section€366.26€hearing.Ð `(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €w ÔòòJonathan€M.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€39€Cal.App.4th€1826,€1829„1830.€€A€notice€ofÐ è 8  Ðintent€to€file€a€writ€petition€pursuant€to€rule€39.1B€must€be€timely€filed.€€Absent€aÐ Ô$  Ðshowing€of€good€cause,€the€reviewing€court€is€obligated€to€dismiss€the€petition€forÐ À  Ðuntimeliness€of€the€notice€of€intent.€€Where€petitioner€fails€to€timely€initiate€the€writÐ ¬ü  Ðproceedings,€petitioner€is€barred€in€any€subsequent€appeal€from€making€further€challengesÐ ˜è  Ðto€the€order€terminating€reunification€services€and€setting€a€hearing€under€section€366.26.Ð„Ô (#(# ÐÌà0  àHowever,€a€writ€petitioner€can€hardly€be€subject€to€the€sanction€of€dismissal,€or€any€otherÐ \¬ Ðsanction,€for€untimely€filings€over€which€he€or€she€has€no€control.ÐH˜(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €y ÔòòJoyce€G.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€38€Cal.App.4th€1501.€€The€writ€review€created€byÐ  p Ðsection€366.26,€subdivision€(l)€and€implemented€by€rule€39.1B€does€not€exclude€summaryÐ  \ Ðdenial€as€a€dispositional€option.€€The€Legislature€did€not€intend€to€require€an€alternativeÐ øH Ðwrit€or€order€to€show€cause€and€a€decision€by€written€opinion€in€all€rule€39.1B€writÐ ä4 Ðproceedings.€€Summary€denial€is€appropriate€in€limited€circumstances€i.e.,€when€theÐ Ð  Ðpetition€(1)€is€untimely€filed,€(2)€fails€to€tender€and€substantively€to€address€a€materialÐ ¼  Ðissue€or€issues,€(3)€is€not€supported€by€an€adequate€record,€or€(4)€when€full€examinationÐ ¨ø Ðof€the€proceedings€reveals€that€petitioner€has€not€tendered€an€arguable€issue.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.Ð ”ä Ð1506.)ЀÐ(#(# ÐÌà0  àSummary€denial€does€not€establish€law€of€the€case,€and€the€petitioner,€therefore,€retainsÐ X ¨ Ðhis€or€her€appellate€remedy€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(l)(1)(C))€but€is€limited€to€the€same€issue€onÐ D!” Ðthe€same€record€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(l)(1)(B))€and€thus€is€destined€on€appeal€to€receive€theÐ 0"€  Ðsame€result.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1514.)Ð#l!(#(# ÐÌÔ& Ø Ôà0  àÔ €{ ÔòòRoxanne€H.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€35€Cal.App.4th€1008.€€The€time€deadline€set€out€inÐ ô$D # Ðrule€39.1B(k)€for€filing€a€writ€Ô'Øô$~ŒÔpetition€is€mandatory.€€Consequently,€the€filing€of€a€petitionÐ à%0!$ Ðwithin€10€days€of€the€preparation€of€the€record€as€mandated€by€rule€39.1B(k)€is€a€clearÐ Ì&"% Ðrequirement€for€the€right€to€a€review€on€the€merits€of€an€order€setting€a€366.26€hearing.€Ð ¸'#& Ð(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1011.)€€Petitioner's€failure€to€file€the€writ€petition€within€the€applicable€timeÐ ¤(ô#' Ðlimit€established€by€rule€39.1B€requires€dismissal€of€the€petition.€€Further,€petitioner€isÐ )à$( Ðbarred€in€any€subsequent€appeal€from€making€further€challenges€to€the€order€setting€aÐ |*Ì%) Ðhearing€under€section€366.26.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€1012„1013.)Ðh+¸&*(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €} ÔòòJames€B.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€35€Cal.App.4th€1014.€€Various€procedural€problemsÐ @-(, Ðare€presented€to€the€courts€by€rule€39.1B€(hereafter,€the€Rule)€which€either€should€beÐ ° Ðauthoritatively€interpreted€by€the€Supreme€Court€or€substantially€amended€by€the€JudicialÐ œì ÐCounsel.ЈØ(#(# ÐÌà0  àPursuant€to€the€Rule,€the€"respondent's€brief"€must€be€submitted€within€10€days€of€theÐ `° Ðdate€the€petition€was€filed.€€(Rule€39.1B(k).)€€The€respondent,€of€course,€is€the€superiorÐ L œ Ðcourt.€€It€is€the€real€party€in€interest€who€must€file€a€brief€in€opposition€to€the€petition.€Ð 8 ˆ ÐThe€use€of€the€language€"respondent's€brief"€is€a€misnomer,€no€doubt€caused€by€theÐ $ t Ðunfortunate€hybridization€of€appeal€and€writ€procedures€by€the€drafters€of€the€Rule.€€(òòId.óó,Ð  ` Ðat€p.€1017.)Ðü L (#(# ÐÌà0  àWhen€a€writ€proceeding€under€the€Rule€is€fully€briefed,€the€Court€of€Appeal€is€required€toÐ Ô$  Ðconduct€oral€argument€absent€a€waiver€thereof.€€The€Rule€provides€that€oral€argumentÐ À  Ð"shall"€be€held€in€each€case€within€30€days€of€the€filing€of€the€opposition€to€the€petition,Ð ¬ü  Ðunless€argument€is€waived€or€there€is€good€cause€for€an€extension€of€time.€€(RuleÐ ˜è  Ð39.1B(o).)€€The€Rule€also€requires€that€the€reviewing€court€determine€the€petition€on€itsÐ „Ô  Ðmerits,€absent€exceptional€circumstances.€€(Rule€39.1B(m).)€€The€Rule,€however,€fails€toÐ pÀ Ðprovide€for€a€mechanism€analogous€to€an€alternative€writ€or€an€order€to€show€cause,€soÐ \¬ Ðthat€a€cause€is€created€and€a€written€opinion€is€filed€and€becomes€law€of€the€case.€€OurÐ H˜ ÐSupreme€Court€has€made€it€clear€that€these€are€necessary€conditions€in€writ€cases€forÐ 4„ Ðplenary€review€on€the€merits.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€1017„1018.)Ð p(#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€Rule's€failures€place€appellate€courts€in€a€procedural€quandary.€€Supreme€CourtÐ øH Ðdecisional€law€on€the€lore€of€writs€requires€an€alternative€writ€or€an€order€to€show€causeÐ ä4 Ðbefore€there€can€be€full„blown€merit€review€of€a€writ€proceeding.€€The€Legislature€clearlyÐ Ð  Ðintended€such€plenary€review€of€the€merits€in€section€366.26€cases.€€Thus,€the€Rule'sÐ ¼  Ðfailure€to€provide€for€such€a€procedure€violates€the€writ€lore€of€this€state€as€expressed€inÐ ¨ø ÐSupreme€Court€decisions.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1018.)Дä(#(# ÐÌà0  àUnfortunately,€in€most€of€these€cases€there€simply€is€not€time€for€the€usual€writÐ l¼ Ðprocedures€„„€another€aspect€of€procedure€apparently€overlooked€by€the€drafters€of€theÐ X ¨ ÐRule.€€The€Rule€does€not€appear€to€contemplate€the€amount€of€time€usually€required€forÐ D!” Ðthe€issuance€of€an€alternative€writ€or€order€to€show€cause,€a€return€thereto€and€review€ofÐ 0"€  Ðthe€record€by€this€court,€all€within€the€30€days€prior€to€oral€argument.€€The€Rule€also€doesÐ #l! Ðnot€contemplate€that€by€issuing€an€alternative€writ€the€appellate€court€can€lose€control€ofÐ $X" Ðthe€proceedings.€€An€alternative€writ,€which€commands€the€trial€court€to€change€its€rulingÐ ô$D # Ðor€in€the€alternative€appear€and€argue€why€a€peremptory€writ€should€not€issue,€often€isÐ à%0!$ Ðconstrued€by€the€trial€court€as€a€command€to€reverse€itself.€€An€alternative€writ€is€not€aÐ Ì&"% Ðcalendar€notice€for€oral€argument€of€an€appeal.€€(òòIbid.óó)и'#&(#(# ÐÌà0  àTo€add€to€the€conundrum,€these€writ€petitions€are€frequently€not€fully€briefed€until€theÐ )à$( Ðsection€366.26€hearing€is€almost€upon€the€reviewing€court.€€The€trial€court€will€set€aÐ |*Ì%) Ðsection€366.26€hearing€within€only€four€months.€€During€that€time€the€writ€record€must€beÐ h+¸&* Ðprepared€and€filed,€and€the€matter€must€be€briefed€and€argued.€€Moreover,€the€reviewingÐ T,¤'+ Ðcourt's€hands€are€effectively€tied€by€the€Rule's€virtual€prohibition€of€stays€of€sectionÐ @-(, Ð366.26€hearings.€€(Rule€39.1B(n).)€€(òòIbid.óó)а(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ € ÔòòSteve€J.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€35€Cal.App.4th€798.€€While€the€expedited€processÐ ˆØ Ðenvisioned€by€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l)(1)€is€entitled€an€extraordinary€writÐ tÄ Ðproceeding,€it€is€in€reality€a€hybrid,€an€amalgam€of€writ€and€appellate€procedures.€Ð `° ÐCertainly,€the€most€notable€difference€between€rule€39.1B€proceedings€and€originalÐ L œ Ðproceedings€for€writ€of€mandate,€certiorari€and€prohibition€which€supports€this€view€is€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðlegislative€encouragement,€in€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l),€for€a€reviewing€court€toÐ $ t Ðdecide€such€petitions€"on€their€merits"€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(l)(4)(B)).€€By€contrast,€theÐ  ` ÐLegislature€has€not€urged€on€the€merits€review€in€original€proceedings€for€writ€ofÐ ü L  Ðmandate,€certiorari€and€prohibition.€€Instead,€reviewing€courts€routinely€employÐ è 8  Ðdiscretionary€grounds€to€deny€relief€sought€in€such€original€proceedings.€€The€LegislatureÐ Ô$  Ðhas€mandated€as€well€the€juvenile€court's€advisement€of€rights€under€section€366.26,Ð À  Ðsubdivision€(l),€akin€to€an€advisement€of€appellate€rights,€and€the€implementation€of€timeÐ ¬ü  Ðrequirements€for€these€proceedings,€something€which€is€required€in€matters€of€appellateÐ ˜è  Ðreview,€but€not€writ€proceedings.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€806„807.)Ð„Ô (#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ& Ø ÔPursuant€to€its€legislative€mandate,€the€Judicial€Council€has€drafted€and€adopted€ruleÐ \¬ Ð39.1B€to€implement€section€Ô'Ø\o§Ô366.26,€subdivision€(l).€€The€procedures€set€forth€in€ruleÐ H˜ Ð39.1B€follow€the€Legislature's€lead€by€adapting€rules€of€both€writ€and€appellateÐ 4„ Ðprocedures€for€use€in€these€cases.€€For€example,€the€Judicial€Council€has€adopted€aÐ  p Ð"notice€of€intent"€procedure,€similar€to€that€of€a€notice€of€appeal.€€Also,€it€has€establishedÐ  \ Ða€timetable,€something€which€does€not€exist€in€other€original€proceedings,€to€ensureÐ øH Ðtimely€resolution€of€these€matters€before€the€juvenile€court€conducts€its€section€366.26Ð ä4 Ðhearing.ÐÐ (#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€goal€of€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l)€and€rule€39.1B€is€for€the€reviewing€court€toÐ ¨ø Ðavoid€the€use€of€discretionary€grounds€to€deny€relief,€assuming€specific€conditionsÐ ”ä Ðprecedent€are€met,€and€decide€cases€"on€their€merits"€as€if€it€were€a€direct€appeal.€€ThoseÐ €Ð Ðconditions€precedent€are€that€the€petitioner:€€file€in€a€timely€manner€the€petition€forÐ l¼ Ðextraordinary€writ€review;€substantively€address€in€the€petition€the€specific€issues€to€beÐ X ¨ Ðchallenged;€and€support€that€challenge€by€an€adequate€record.€€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(l)(1)(A)Ð D!” Ð&€(B).)€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€807.)Ð0"€ (#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€issuance€of€an€alternative€writ€or€order€to€show€cause€is€not€required€in€proceedingsÐ $X" Ðunder€rule€39.1B€in€order€to€reach€the€merits.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€810.)Ðô$D #(#(# ÐÌà0  àA€notice€setting€a€case€for€oral€argument€is€as€effective,€if€not€equivalent€to,€an€alternativeÐ Ì&"% Ðwrit€or€order€to€show€cause€in€terms€of€setting€up€a€writ€petition€for€a€decision€on€itsÐ ¸'#& Ðmerits.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€808.)€€In€traditional€writs,€an€alternative€writ€or€order€to€show€cause€andÐ ¤(ô#' Ðoral€argument€are€conditions€precedent€to€an€opinion€becoming€law€of€the€case.€€(òòIbid.óó)€Ð )à$( ÐHowever,€by€its€enactment€of€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l),€the€Legislature€hasÐ |*Ì%) Ðforeclosed€the€right€to€appeal€from€the€findings€and€orders€of€the€juvenile€court€in€aÐ h+¸&* Ðsection€366.26€hearing€unless€certain€conditions€are€met.€€In€so€doing,€the€Legislature€hasÐ T,¤'+ Ðrendered€the€"law€of€the€case"€doctrine€relevant€to€dependency€writ€proceedings€fromÐ @-(, Ðorders€setting€a€section€366.26€hearing.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€809.)€€Further,€the€Legislature€has€theÐ ° Ðpower€to€create€new€types€of€writ€proceedings€which€have€both€procedural€andÐ œì Ðsubstantive€characteristics€not€found€in€traditional€writs.€€The€Legislature€delegated€thatÐ ˆØ Ðtask€to€the€Judicial€Council€which€decided€not€to€adopt€the€procedural€formality€ofÐ tÄ Ðissuing€alternative€writs€or€orders€to€show€cause.€€(òòIbid.óó)Ð`°(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €ƒ ÔòòRonald€S.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€34€Cal.App.4th€1467,€1468„1469.€€Reviewing€court€isÐ 8 ˆ Ðnot€required€to€conduct€an€independent€review€of€the€record€when€petition€for€writ€reliefÐ $ t Ðfrom€order€scheduling€a€section€366.26€hearing€raises€no€issues.׃…×Ý ƒÿÿÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Р`(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €ˆ ÔòòKarl€S.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€34€Cal.App.4th€1397.€€Rule€39.1B,€which€implementsÐ è 8  Ðsection€366.26,€subd.€(l)€in€particular,€requires€a€party€to€file€a€notice€of€intent€with€theÐ Ô$  Ðclerk€of€the€juvenile€court€within€seven€days€of€the€date€of€the€order€setting€a€hearingÐ À  Ðunder€section€366.26.€€(Rule€39.1B(f).)€€This€period€is€extended€five€days€if€the€partyÐ ¬ü  Ðreceived€notice€of€the€order€setting€the€section€366.26€hearing€only€by€mail.Иè (#(# ÐÌà0  àSection€366.26€subdivision€(l)€and€rule€39.1B€are€intended€to€provide€for€the€expeditiousÐ pÀ Ðresolution€of€a€challenge€to€an€order€for€a€section€366.26€hearing.€€(Rule€39.1B(a).)€€ToÐ \¬ Ðcarry€out€this€goal,€rule€39.1B€prescribes€numerous,€successive€time€limits€for€completingÐ H˜ Ðthe€writ€process€described€in€rule€39.1B.€€For€instance,€within€approximately€10€days€ofÐ 4„ Ðthe€filing€of€the€notice€of€intent,€the€record€must€be€prepared€and€filed€with€the€reviewingÐ  p Ðcourt.€€(Rule€39.1B(g).)€€In€turn,€the€petition€must€be€filed€within€10€days€thereafter.€Ð  \ Ð(Rule€39.1B(k).)€€In€other€words,€rule€39.1B€envisions€that€the€petition€itself€will€be€filedÐ øH Ðwithin€about€one€month€after€the€date€of€the€order€setting€the€section€366.26€hearing.€€(òòId.óó,Ð ä4 Ðat€pp.€1402„1403.)ÐÐ (#(# ÐÌà0  àAccordingly,€a€parent's€failure€to€file€a€notice€of€intent€within€the€applicable€time€limitÐ ¨ø Ðestablished€by€rule€39.1B€requires€the€dismissal€of€the€subsequently€filed€petition€forÐ ”ä Ðextraordinary€review€and€precludes€parents€from€raising€issues€related€to€the€order€settingÐ €Ð Ða€section€366.26€hearing€on€appeal€from€a€section€366.26€order€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(l)(2)).€Ð l¼ Ð(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€1403„1404.)ÐX ¨(#(# ÐÌà0  àThe€time€standards€of€rule€39.1B€are€mandatory€rather€than€directory.€€Section€366.26,Ð 0"€  Ðsubdivision€(l)€and€rule€39.1B€encourage€a€review€of€the€merits€of€a€petitioner'sÐ #l! Ðarguments.€€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(l)(4)(A)€&€(B);€rule€39.1B(a),€(b)€&€(m).)€€However,€suchÐ $X" Ðencouragement€is€neither€a€directive€nor€a€license€to€ignore€the€deadlines€established€byÐ ô$D # Ðthe€rule.€€In€this€respect,€section€366.26,€subdivisions€(l)(1)€and€(2)€require€the€filing€of€aÐ ° Ðtimely€petition€as€a€condition€precedent€to€review€on€the€merits.€€Thus,€an€untimelyÐ œì Ðpetition,€in€the€absence€of€some€good€cause€showing€to€explain€the€delay,€constitutes€anÐ ˆØ Ðexception,€or€in€the€words€of€rule€39.1B(m)€"exceptional€circumstances,"€to€excuse€theÐ tÄ Ðappellate€court's€responsibility€to€decide€the€petition€on€the€merits.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1404.)Ð`°(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €Š ÔòòRobin€V.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€33€Cal.App.4th€1158,€1160„1161,€fn.€1);€òòGuillermoÔ €Œ Ô€G.Ð 8 ˆ Ðv.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€33€Cal.App.4th€1168,€1172„1173.€€Under€òòIn€re€Matthew€C.Ô €Q ÔóóÐ $ t Ð(1993)€6€Cal.4th€386,€a€birth€parent€or€other€aggrieved€party€could€wait€until€an€appealÐ  ` Ðfrom€a€judgment€terminating€parental€rights€or€adopting€some€other€permanent€plan€toÐ ü L  Ðseek€review€of€the€juvenile€court's€referral€order.€€The€Legislature€abrogated€the€òòMatthewÐ è 8  ÐC.Ô €Q Ôóó€holding€with€the€enactment€of€section€366.26,€subdivision€(l),€which€provides€thatÐ Ô$  Ðreferral€orders€entered€after€January€1,€1995,€may€òònotóó€be€reviewed€via€appeal€unless€aÐ À  Ðtimely€writ€petition€has€been€filed€and€either€"summarily€denied€or€otherwise€not€decidedÐ ¬ü  Ðon€the€merits."€€(See€rules€39.1A(b)(2),€39.1B(d)(2),€39.2(b)(2)€&€1436.5(c)(2).)€€TheÐ ˜è  Ðappellate€courts€are€"[e]ncourage[d]€.€.€.€to€determine€all€writ€petitions€filed€pursuant€toÐ „Ô  Ðthis€subdivision€on€their€merits."€€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(1)(4)(B).)€€To€this€end,€the€JudicialÐ pÀ ÐCouncil€has€promulgated€rule€39.1B(m),€which€provides,€"Absent€exceptionalÐ \¬ Ðcircumstances€the€appellate€court€shall€review€the€petition€for€extraordinary€writ€andÐ H˜ Ðdecide€it€on€the€merits."Ð4„(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €‡ ÔòòIn€re€Shaundra€L.óó€(1995)€33€Cal.App.4th€303.€€In€enacting€the€1994€amendment€to€sectionÐ  \ Ð366.26,€subdivision€(l),€the€Legislature€clearly€intended€that€the€writ€proceedingÐ øH Ðreviewing€an€order€setting€an€underlying€dependency€proceeding€for€a€hearing€be€oneÐ ä4 Ðwhich€resolved€the€merits€of€the€dispute.€€Accordingly,€the€parties€must€be€given€theÐ Ð  Ðopportunity€to€fully€brief€the€cause.€€Absent€an€emergency,€a€concession€of€error,€or€aÐ ¼  Ðshowing€the€petitioner's€entitlement€to€relief€is€so€obvious€that€no€purpose€would€beÐ ¨ø Ðserved€by€full€consideration€of€the€petition,€an€alternative€writ€or€order€to€show€causeÐ ”ä Ðshould€issue,€the€parties€should€be€afforded€the€opportunity€to€orally€argue€the€cause,€andÐ €Ð Ðthe€case€should€be€resolved€by€a€written€opinion.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€314.)€€Although€theÐ l¼ Ðprocedures€set€forth€in€rule€39.1B€are€slightly€different€from€that€envisioned€by€theÐ X ¨ ÐLegislature,€the€court€rules€are€consistent€with€the€Legislature's€goal€of€resolution€on€theÐ D!” Ðmerits€to€the€extent€they€afford€the€parties€an€opportunity€to€brief€the€issues€and€provideÐ 0"€  Ðfor€oral€argument.€€Although€the€court€rules€do€not€require€the€issuance€of€an€order€toÐ #l! Ðshow€cause€or€the€filing€of€an€opinion,€in€deference€to€the€clear€legislative€intent,€theÐ $X" Ðorder€to€show€cause€procedure€should€be€utilized€and€opinions€should€be€issued.€€SecondÐ ô$D # ÐDistrict,€Division€Five€will€utilize€the€order€to€show€cause€procedure€and€issue€opinions.€Ð à%0!$ Ð(òòId.óó,€at€pp.€315„316.)ÐÌ&"%(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ € ÔòòIn€re€Rebekah€R.óó€(1994)€27€Cal.App.4th€1638,€1646„1648.€€In€dependency€proceedings,Ð ¤(ô#' Ðthe€right€to€appeal€does€not€accrue€until€the€court€orders€a€disposition.€€Ordinarily,€onÐ )à$( Ðappeal€from€a€disposition€a€parent€may€present€issues€which€have€arisen€from€theÐ |*Ì%) Ðproceedings€up€to€that€point.€€However,€this€rule€is€not€applicable€when€the€dispositionÐ h+¸&* Ðincludes€a€blanket€denial€of€all€reunification€services€under€section€361.5,€subdivision€(b)Ð T,¤'+ Ðand€an€accompanying€order€for€a€section€€366.26€hearing.€€Under€such€Ô_Ôcircumstances,Ð @-(, Ð[former]€section€366.26,€subdivision€(k)€operates€to€displace€section€395,€and€only€writÐ ° Ðreview€is€available.€€Further,€the€expeditious€review€of€such€a€disposition€order€is€no€lessÐ œì Ðimportant€when€the€claim€of€error€pertains€not€to€the€denial€of€reunification€but€rather€toÐ ˆØ Ðthe€underlying€jurisdictional€finding€or€some€other€matter€which€goes€to€the€validity€ofÐ tÄ Ðthe€order.€Ð`°(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €‰ ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔMoriahÔ_Ô€T.óó€(1994)€23€Cal.App.4th€1367,€1371.€€Visitation€order€issued€in€conjunctionÐ 8 ˆ Ðwith€18„month€review€hearing€orders€terminating€family€reunification€services€andÐ $ t Ðreferring€the€cause€for€a€section€366.26€hearing€is€an€appealable€order.Ð `(#(# ÐÌà0  àÔ €‘ ÔòòÔ_ÔRaynaÔ_Ô€R.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1993)€20€Cal.App.4th€1398.€€Superior€court€appointment€ofÐ è 8  Ðcounsel€to€represent€indigent€party€in€dependency€proceedings€encompasses€writ€petitionsÐ Ô$  Ðfiled€under€sections€366.25,€subdivision€(j),€and€section€366.26,€subdivision€(k).€€(òòId.óó,€atÐ À  Ðp.€1404.)€€The€county€must€pay€for€transcripts€supporting€writ€petitions€under€theseÐ ¬ü  Ðsections.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€1406.)€€Litigants€must€submit€a€record€adequate€to€permit€review€ofÐ ˜è  Ðthe€challenged€ruling€or€present€facts€sufficient€to€excuse€the€failure€to€submit€anÐ „Ô  Ðadequate€record.€€Additionally,€litigants€must€present€a€comprehensive€statement€of€theÐ pÀ Ðfacts€and€procedures€and€points€and€authorities.€€Completion€of€Judicial€Council€FormÐ \¬ ÐNo.€JV„825€will€not€meet€the€well„established€requirements€for€writ€relief.€€(òòId.óó,€at€pp.Ð H˜ Ð1406„1407.)Ð4„(#(# ÐÌÔ  Ôà0  àÔ €“ ÔòòIn€re€Diana€G.óó€(1992)€10€Cal.App.4th€1468,€1482.€€Order€under€section€366.26,Ð  \ Ðsubdivision€(b)(2)€for€60„day€continuance€of€selection€and€implementation€hearing€afterÐ øH Ðidentification€of€adoption€as€the€permanent€plan€for€the€minor€is€not€a€final€andÐ ä4 Ðappealable€order.ÐÐ (#(# ÐÔ €wÙÔÔ  ÔÌà0  àÔ €R ÔòòIn€re€Ô_ÔJennileeÔ_Ô€T.óó€(1992)€3€Cal.App.4th€212,€217„218;€Ô €T ÔòòIn€re€Rebecca€H.óó€(1991)€227Ð ¨ø ÐCal.App.3d€825,€835„837;€Ô €‹ ÔòòIn€re€Catherine€S.óó€(1991)€230€Cal.App.3d€1253,€1256:€€RuleÐ ”ä Ðthat€order€scheduling€a€section€366.26€hearing€is€not€appealable€but€reviewable€only€byÐ €Ð Ðpetition€for€extraordinary€writ€encompasses€a€dispositional€order€denying€reunificationÐ l¼ Ðservices€under€section€361.5,€subdivision€(b)(2)€because€a€challenge€to€the€completeÐ X ¨ Ðdenial€of€reunification€services€constitutes€a€direct€attack€on€the€disposition€orderÐ D!” Ðscheduling€a€section€366.26€hearing.Ð0"€ (#(# ÐÌÔ €w¼ÚÔÔ  Ôà  à(e)à0 ` àòòSECTION€388€ORDERóóÐ$X"` (#` (# ÐÔ €wþÝÔÌà0  àÔ €• ÔòòIn€re€Ronald€V.óó€(1993)€13€Cal.App.4th€1803,€1807,€fn.€2.€€Order€denying€388€petition€toÐ à%0!$ Ðmodify€permanency€planning€orders€terminating€parental€rights€and€freeing€minor€forÐ Ì&"% Ðadoption,€although€void€(ðð€366.26,€subd.€(h)),€is€appealable€as€an€order€after€judgment.€€(ððÐ ¸'#& Ð395.)Ф(ô#'(#(# ÐÌà  à(f)à0 ` àòòTRANSFER€ORDERóóÐ|*Ì%)` (#` (# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Christopher€T.óó€(1998)€60€Cal.App.4th€1282,€1287.€€Section€379€and€rule€1425€conferÐ T,¤'+ Ðthe€right€to€appeal€a€transfer€order€on€either€of€the€affected€courts.€€Although€there€is€noÐ @-(, Ðsimilar€statute€or€rule€specifically€granting€a€parent€the€right€to€appeal,€section€395Ð ° Ðconfers€the€right€to€appeal€a€transfer€order€on€the€parent.Мì(#(# ÐÌà  à(g)à0 ` àòòPOSTJUDGMENT€ORDERóóÐtÄ` (#` (# ÐÌà0  àòòIn€re€Daniel€K.óó€(1998)€61€Cal.App.4th€661.€€All€post„dispositional€orders€in€dependencyÐ L œ Ðmatters€are€directly€appealable€except€for€post„1994€orders€setting€a€section€366.26Ð 8 ˆ Ðhearing.€€Limitation€applied€to€post€judgment€appeals€in€general€civil€proceedings€broughtÐ $ t Ðunder€Code€of€Civil€Procedure€section€904.1€[only€post€judgment€orders€that€eitherÐ  ` Ð"affect"€the€judgment€or€relate€to€it€by€enforcing€it€or€staying€its€execution€are€separatelyÐ ü L  Ðappealable]€is€a€general€statute€which€is€superseded€by€the€specific€section€395€whichÐ è 8  Ðcontrols.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€668.)ÐÔ$ (#(# ÐÌà0  àAssuming,€without€deciding,€that€the€limitation€on€appeal€of€post€judgment€orders€inÐ ¬ü  Ðdelinquency€proceedings€brought€under€section€800€applies€in€dependency€proceedingsÐ ˜è  Ð[post€judgment€order€must€affect€the€substantial€rights€of€the€juvenile€to€be€appealable],Ð „Ô  Ðpost€judgment€order€denying€continuing€discovery€of€minor's€placement€and€allÐ pÀ Ðcommunication€with€respect€thereto€and€all€observations€of€minor's€behavior€by€school,Ð \¬ Ðguardian€and€therapist€meet€that€test.€€(òòId.óó,€at€p.€670.)ÐH˜(#(# ÐÌ