WPC+l hyٳ f``OҲh\C+{ӣFN%Ufx =ġ=s=OP5|xA7S K|~ (B{j0ȻcS :XO,;]Ϫh?*M/;+6#f%86KJUSڃ]'{ /RˤcRew-[yYNغ_u'@<*j,튮XAʙ?yb*4Bkb7֌O2 [O% ,BuYgVJ괡yI {} ?ff{UCsDXK+ XjcQ eV&Z-Ņgs.): zSbR }&RMeɲdw>>j'rƛvP 5W -c7}Ӳ c1!V"A _6^L}F:zjYU: % 0 0m 0~ 0~v 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0 0) 0< 0N" 0ap 0 0 0Z 0 ! 0! 0" 0d# 0H$ 0$ 0z% 0& & 0=& 0F%' 0Pk' 1' 0N( 1( 0** 0k.E. . / 1)/ 0w/ '0 11UNP1P1 0k1 1 22n2 0P~5 B5#5N8UN8 1u9^ y9w9499 m9 19 /=: -l: 9: 0): : ); %C; ;h; %;v; 0>> 0D ? #N? #q? ;? 7? 1@@ 0c@ @@ 0U0A 0A 0hB 0-C 0C 0D 0XE 0F 0F 0MG 0H 0H 0I 0CJ 0J 0K 0&L #L L 0L 0M 1BN 0N 0O 0GPfPaP 1Q 0Q 02R 0R 0hS 0S 0T 06U 0U 0>V 0V 0W 0X 0Y 0Z 0p[ 0R\ 0 ] 02] 0^ 0: _ 0YF_ 0__ 0 _ 0a 0b B*d;d D/9e D+he 0e D/g 0g 06h 0h 0:i 0^j 0<lj 1ej 0N kU6[kU>kU*kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 72k<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXV& 8Document[8]Document Style0..8` ..` ̀_  e  Ԁ......t Sty.1.1.11.1.11.1.1]h..hh..h....p..pp..pTp..pTp..pTl..pTloVy8Document[4]Document Style.. . ̀_  e  Ԁ......t Sty.1.1.11.1.11.1.1]h..hh..h....p..pp..pTp..pTp..pTl..pTloV 9{8Document[6]Document Style8... ̀_  e  Ԁ......t Sty.1.1.11.1.11.1.1]h..hh..h....p..pp..pTp..pTp..pTl.V 9w8Document[5]Document Style0... ̀_  e  Ԁ......t Sty.1.1.11.1.11.1.1]h..hh..h....p..pp..pTp..pTp..pTl.V:8Document[2]Document Style   2A.3  Ԁ   V& 8Document[7]Document Style0..0` ..` Ԁ   Ԁ......t Sty.1.1.11.1.11.1.1]h..hh..h....p..pp..pTp..pTp..pTl..pTloz` :Right Par[1]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..  2I.3  Ԁ..0..zs B:Right Par[2]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..  2A.3  Ԁ..0` ..` VJ8Document[3]Document Style..   21.3  Ԁ   z :Right Par[3]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  ..P   21.3  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. z &:Right Par[4]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..   2a.3  Ԁ .. 0..z {j:Right Par[5]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..  2(1)3  Ԁ..0h..hz Ĵ:Right Par[6]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..  2(a)3  Ԁh..h0..z :Right Par[7]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....  2i)3  Ԁ..0..z :Right Par[8]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..  2a)3  Ԁ..0p..pVc08Document[1]Document Style  @..^    2I.3  Ԁ     Ԉ l= g:Technical[5]Technical Document Style..   2(1)3  Ԁ. l= :Technical[6]Technical Document Style..   2(a)3  Ԁ. l:%:Technical[2]Technical Document Style   2A.3  Ԁ   .. l7!:Technical[3]Technical Document Style   21.3  Ԁ   .. l6! ):Technical[4]Technical Document Style   2a.3  Ԁ   .. lE0 D:Technical[1]Technical Document Style    2I.3  Ԁ     .. l<a~:Technical[7]Technical Document Style..   2i)3  Ԁ. l<a:Technical[8]Technical Document Style..   2a)3  Ԁ. R& 8BibliogrphyBibliography0....fE2Doc InitInitialize Document Style( !   ( ($0 ($0 0 (($0 0 0   A_ekqwDocumentDocument StyleI.1.A.a.(1)(a)i)a)jD4Tech InitInitialize Technical Style( # ( CuyTechnicalTechnical Document Style11.11.1.11.1.1.11.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1x?t2PleadingHeader for numbered pleading paper %  &(   R6XXXXX?5''*dE*??5''*dE*?HH1HH2HH3HH4HH5HH6HH7HH8HH910111213141516171819202122232425262728  .+(C2$ 4!   CCASESCRULES(CEKQW]cioAutoList3A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#  J$   @ @ `   1    _Ԁ8X82XXXPeoplev.Howard(2005)34Cal.4th1129CPENAL CODE(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(C2$ 4!     CRight ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersI.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)#|x <6X9`("Courier 10cpiXx6X@8;X@)4  *TmsRmn 12ptBoldS2XXt4  ;X(\  ` TmsRmn 8ptS2S2L\  P;P<6X9`(,Courier 10cpiLegalXx6X@UX@(($   dHP LaserJet 6L/LAPTOP-FDAP/Session 24,,,,0 (hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)$2 wf2^O1tU CEKQW]cioAutoList2A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.COTHER OUT OF STATECU.S. CONSTITUTIONCCALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION( $CCIVIL CODECGOVERNMENT CODECBUSINESS CODECWELFARE AND INSTITUTIONSCEVIDENCE CODE   ' AFD0AFD .   (|(2$ 4!      `   0  (#$  0  CVEHICLE CODECPROBATE CODECBUSINESS AND PROFESSIONSCHEALTH AND SAFETY CODE CEKQW]cioAutoList1A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(;3$2#  0  .3  0  In re Smith (1970) 3 Cal.3d 192*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   CINSTRUCTIONSCOTHER(&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (CEKQW]cioAutoList4A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` TABLE A(ʽCEKQW]cioAutoList5A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   0AA.Normal  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition T  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(hh&H1  5+ ` hp x 5      5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H2  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H3  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H4  5+ ` hp x 5 XXX 5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H5  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H6  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  2DD0Address  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted  /%  ,Kk %#/K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/  <:zBottom of 7(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7(X75+ ` hp x 5  &  d dpage page chapter volume footnote endnote )1dxd'dxd<:zTop of For7(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7(X75+ ` hp x 5  )2dxd0KS.SampleK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  ]^_`abcd 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(O$<6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial9i) 4!   _ TRX3'Avery 3264 White Mini FolX3' Letter3'LetterNEW LABELSni Folni Fol3'LetterT>HXXX8>HXXdd8 8X>H @aa#8X82X8#8X8X82INTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA    @ FOURTHAPPELLATEDISTRICT  @$DIVISIONONE  Ѐ   *m5nddd Xdd Xdd X  ,dd , dd +     THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  d CALIFORNIA,  d  PlaintiffandRespondent, d  vs. d  JOHNSMITH, d  DefendantandAppellant. d  ,5d ,     P CourtofAppeal  d No.D000000 d       P SuperiorCourt d  No.SCD00000(d  5 (@*8 @ 8 @   APPELLANTSMOTIONTORECALLTHEREMITTITUR D ANDFORLEAVETOFILEASUPPLEMENTALBRIEF B INLIGHTOFPEOPLEv.HOWARD(2005)34Cal.4th1129 @    TOTHECOURTOFAPPEAL: <  ` AppellantmovespursuanttoRulesofCourt,rule26(c)foranorder < recallingtheremittiturandpermittingthefilingofsupplementalbriefingon <  theeffectoftherecentdecisioninPeoplev.Howard(2005)34Cal.4th < " 1129onappellantsconvictionofseconddegreefelonymurder.This <"$ motionisbasedontheattachedmemorandumofpointsandauthorities. <$& Dated:_____,20050  0h  0h h 0  0p  Respectfullysubmitted,<&!(p p   `     h      p ___________________ <(#*  <,'. Ї  POINTSANDAUTHORITIES     0 ` Appellantsseconddegreefelonymurderconvictionmustbe  reversedbecauseitwasbasedonthepredicateoffenseof  recklessevasionofapeaceofficer,which,asrecentlyfoundin  Peoplev.Howard,, K#  1      ׀isnotavalidpredicateforseconddegree   felonymurder.  ` `    ` A.  ProceduralBackground     ` Appellantwasconvictedofseconddegreefelonymurderinthiscase   basedontheunderlyingfelonyofrecklessevasionofapeaceofficerin   violationofVehicleCodesection2800.2.Onappeal,appellantarguedfor   reversalofhisconvictiononthegroundrecklessevasionofapeaceofficer  wasnotan inherentlydangerousfelonyandthuswasnotaproper  predicateforseconddegreefelonymurder.Thiscourtrejectedthis  argumentandaffirmedtheconviction.[IftheHowardissuewasnotraised  intheclientsappeal,modifytheprevioustwosentencesaccordingly.]  [Detailanyfurtherproceedings,includingtheissuanceoftheremittitur.]   ` OnJanuary27,2005,theCaliforniaSupremeCourtdecidedPeople   v.Howard,holdingthatrecklessevasionofapeaceofficerwasnotan "  inherentlydangerousfelonyandthuswouldnotqualifyasthepredicate $  forseconddegreefelonymurder.(Id.,34Cal.4thatpp.11361139, &!" expresslydisapprovingthecontraryholdinginPeoplev.Sewell(2000)80 (#$ Cal.App.4th690,694.)Peoplev.Howardresolvesfavorablytoappellant  theexactissueheraisedunsuccessfullyonappeal.[Iftheissuewas not   raisedintheclientsappeal,deletetheprecedingsentenceandseesection   Cbelow.]    B.  ` Recalloftheremittiturisappropriatetoimplementappellants   0 ` habeascorpusrighttoassertunderPeoplev.Howardthathe    wasconvictedforconductthatdoesnotconstituteseconddegree   felonymurder . ` `   ` RulesofCourt,rule26(c)authorizesthiscourttorecalltheremittitur   andreinstatetheappealforgoodcause.Recalloftheremittituris  appropriatewhereanerrorhasoccurredwhichwouldentitleadefendantto  habeascorpusrelief.(Peoplev.Mutch(1971)4Cal.3d389,396397.)   ` Peoplev.Mutch,supra,involvedproceedingsfundamentallysimilar  tothepresentcase.InMutch,thedefendantwasconvictedofkidnapfor  thepurposeofrobberybasedonhisforciblymovingtworobberyvictims  fromoneroomtoanotherinabuilding.(Id.,4Cal.3datp.397.)The  decisionallawatthetimeoftheconvictionwasthatanyforciblemovement ! ofanintendedrobberyvictim,nomatterhowslight,constitutedkidnapfor # robbery.(Id.atp.393.)Threeyearsaftertheconviction,however,the % ! CaliforniaSupremeCourtdecidedPeoplev.Daniels(1969)71Cal.2d '"# 1119,holdingthatkidnapforthepurposeofrobberyrequiredmovement )$% substantiallyincreasingtheriskofharmtothevictim.(Id.atp.394.) +&' FollowingthedecisioninDaniels,thedefendantinMutchpetitionedthe  CourtofAppealforrecalloftheremittiturtoreopenhisappealinlightof  Daniels.(Id.atp.393.)   ` TheSupremeCourtinMutchheldthatthedefendantwasentitledto   arecalloftheremittiturandtoreopentheappeal.Thecourtexplained:   8 ` Asageneralrule,anerroroflawdoesnotauthorizethe   recallingofaremittitur.Anexceptionismade,however,   whentheerrorisofsuchdimensionsastoentitlethe   defendanttoawritofhabeascorpus.Theremedyofrecallof   theremittiturmaythenbedeemedanadjuncttothewrit,and  willbegrantedwhenappropriatetoimplementthe  defendantsrighttohabeascorpus.` x` x (Id.atpp.396397,citationsomitted.)Thecourtspecificallynotedthatthe  defendantwasnotbarredby finalityforpurposesofappealbecausethe  righttohabeascorpusexiststorectifyanerrorwhenthetrialcourthas  acted inexcessofitsjurisdiction.(Id.atp.396.)Atrialcourtactsin  excessofitsjurisdictionwhenitconvictsadefendantforconductnot  prohibitedbystatute.(Ibid.;accord,InreHarris(1993)5Cal.4th813,   829841[generalrulebarringuseofhabeascorpustoraiseanissue " previouslyraisedandrejectedonappealdoesnotapplywhereclaimasserts $  afundamentalconstitutionalerror,anactinexcessofthetrialcourts &"" jurisdiction,orapostappealchangeinthelaw].) ($$  ` ThecourtinMutchfurthernotedthatthedefendantsrighttorelief *&& wasnotdependentontheconceptof retroactivity.(Id.atpp.395396.)  Retroactivity,thecourtexplained,isprimarilyconcernedwiththe  applicationofchangesinevidentiaryandprocedurallaw.Bycontrast,a  decisionthatconfirmsthesubstantivedefinitionofacrimeinamanner   excludingthepriorconductofadefendantamountstoafindingthatthe   defendant wasconvictedunderastatutewhichdidnotprohibithisactsat   thetimehecommittedthem.(Ibid.)    ` Appellantspostureintheresentcaseisindistinguishablefromthat  ofthedefendantinMutch.AsinMutch,appellantwasconvictedbasedon  conductplainlyfallingoutsidethedefinitionofthecrimewithwhichhe  wascharged.AndasinMutch,asubsequentdecisionoftheCalifornia  SupremeCourtbroughtthiserrortolightbycorrectlydefiningthecrimein  question,disapprovingpreviousdecisionallawtothecontrary.  Accordingly,asinMutch,appellanthereisentitledtoarecallofthe  remittiturandtoreopenhisappealforreconsiderationinlightofthenew   decision. "  ` Basedontheaboveauthorities,theremittiturshouldberecalledand $  theappealreinstatedtoallowsupplementalbriefing,andreconsiderationby &"" thiscourt,inlightofthedecisioninPeoplev.Howard.Appellanthasfiled ($$ aproposedsupplementalbriefalongwiththismotion. *&& Dated:_____,20050  0h  0h h 0  0p  Respectfullysubmitted,p p   `     h      p ___________________  [ThefollowingsectioncaninsertedintheP&Asiftheclientsprevious   appealdid not raisetheHowardissue.Itcanbeomittediftheissuewas   raisedonappealsincethatiswhatoccurredinMutch,(id.atp.394,fn.2)   puttingsuchaclientscaseonallfourswithMutch.]    C.0 ` Appellantisentitledtoreliefeventhoughhedidnotraisethe   Howardissueonappeal. ` `  - ` Appellantsappellatecounseldidnotraiseonappealtheclaimof  errorultimatelyvindicatedinPeoplev.Howard.Appellantisnonetheless  entitledtorecalloftheremittitur.Asdetailedbelow,therighttoassertnew  decisionallawestablishingadefendantwasconvictedforconductoutside  thedefinitionofthecrimeisnotdependentofhavingpreviouslyraisedthe  issueonappeal.   ` InMutch,supra,theSupremeCourtnotedthatappellatecounsel, !  [w]ithcommendableforesightraisedunsuccessfullyonappealtheclaim # oferrorlatervindicatedbyPeoplev.Daniels.(Mutchsupra,4Cal.3datp. % ! 394,fn.2.)YetthecourtinMutchinnowaysuggestedthedefendants '"# righttohabeascorpusreliefrestedonhishavingraisedtheissueonappeal. )$% Infact,asdetailedbelow,theCaliforniaSupremeCourthasexpressly +&' resolvedthisquestioninfavorofthedefendant.   ` Asageneralrule,habeascorpusisnotavailabletoraiseanissuethat  couldhavebeen,butwasnot,raisedonappeal.(InreDixon(1953)41  Cal.2d756,759.)Butanexceptiontothisgeneralruleexistswherethereis   a satisfactoryexcuseforthefailuretoraisetheissueonappeal.(Id.atp.   760.)Anewstatesupremecourtdecisionchangingthecomplexionofthe   decisionallawisexactlysuchasatisfactoryexcuse,warrantinghabeas   relief.Theemergenceofanappellateclaimbasedonadecision rendered  subsequentto[adefendants]conviction[]presentsspecialcircumstances  constitutinganexcuseforfailuretoemploytheremedyofappeal,  justifyinghabeascorpus.(InreKing(1970)3Cal.3d226,229,citingInre  Dixon,supra,41Cal.2datpp.762763;accord,.8Inre S Smith(1970)3Cal.3d  192,203204[recalloftheremittiturappropriatetoremedyappellate  counselsomissionofessentialclaimoferroronappeal]#8.6#.)   ` Basedontheaboveauthorities,appellantisentitledtorecallofthe   remittiturdespitethefailureofhisappellatecounseltoraisethe Howard " issueonappeal.] $   ` #8X82X8t#