WPCHS W2˵Q\J3(JĦzU. % 0`~ 0 0  0 0 0`m 0 0f 0& 0 0^ 0E;U0 CQfkam B 1 q 0C 1R 0nX 0 # 1u"N]#^ _#wk#4o## m#UN# 0 c# 0M$ 1$ 1^% 0w% \&d& 72H( z( (M( 01( 0=( 0( 0>) 0* 0* 0+ 0a4, 0, 0I- 09- 06. 02/ 0D/ 0:@0 0z0 0_0 0 ^1 0kh2 03 B*5 D35 C5 D+6 0<6 08 068 0 9 0:(: 0hb: 0F:U6;U>F;U*;N;(; 72; 1 < 0U< 0< 0= 0> 0M? 0@ 0@ 0fA 0 B 0B 0sC 0DD 0D 0E 0KF 0F 0G 0H 0H 0kI 09J 0J 0K 07L 0L 0mM 0M D/N D/N 0NN 725OU >gOOkQ<6X9`(CourierX'  thomas, kevin--augment 2aug bo 0 .   R42 SpacingDouble Spacingzf2SectionISection I, II etc. with TOC Level 1  8..  2I.3  0` ..`   xy2SectionASection A, B etc. with TOC Level 2  8.. 8` ..  2A.3  0 ..  d4,QuoteL/R Indented, Single Spaced8.. 8` ..nt2EnvelopeEnvelope #10, for HP LaserJet    \RV,\R41 SpacingSingle Spacingr 6PleadFinalFinal Pleading with 1.5" Left Margin    X  =   u)        C  $#C  fXXXX@4D  1  ڀ(>2g$ g!&XUXXX&bX&XU            (43  x#.Label3Labels, 3-Down FDAP, for HP LaserJet 0          \Rx\    \Rx AL MAIL \  x:EnvelopeDJetEnvelope #10, for DeskJet Plus    \RV,\   X `  X |6Label3DJetLabels, 3-Down for HP DeskJet Plus    \R+\nd+pz HxX,r,n~2Label3iiLabels, 3-Down, FDAP for HP Series II    \R >\   X   X   X   * `CG Times   g)&XUXXX&bX&XU         (44  _S&b@jj0  1  ڄ   dTable_A d435;AGMU]c1I.1 1.a.(1)(a)i)a)($    (5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(!2$ g!&XUXXX&bX&XU            (43    Ӏ  0  3|h <6X9`(CourierXx6X@`7X@* `CG Times PE37P(g$&X(XXX&$X&X(           C  $$CHP LaserJet 1200 Series PCL 603#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)ʲ. {.h~0U(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (b$0  0` (#(#2#   .3  0 ` (#` (# EhCEKQW]cioAutoList21.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(UhCEKQW]cioAutoList3IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#2 SPANGERSpangerBatsonLindenbaum RptrEastridgediresCALJICpretextualnonminority DossFrontemacBenefieldCaspari XXXXGarrett SowaWhitsey CrimTursioA]fterBroadyBittakerEntsminger450.Normal<:Definition T<GD:Definition L , ;1` hp x (#;  8.` hp x (#886Definition('z&H1      XXX(o&H2  XXX(o&H3  XXX(&H4 XXX XXX(o&H5  XXX(o&H6  XXX20Address8SP6Blockquote , , ;1` hp x (#;   8.` hp x (#8,*CITE,dl*CODEKQ<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSR\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis6&)4Hyperlink            <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KQ<6X9`(Courier NewK XXXSR\  `&Times New RomanS<:Preformatted/%  ,Kk (#/KQ<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSR\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk (#/<:zBottom of IGH4$ ** ddI  B    ?S%2A`Arial?9IH*  dd9  XXXSR\  `&Times New RomanS  &0 d dFFFF'dxddd'dxd<:zTop of ForIGH4$** ddI  B    ?S%2A`Arial?9IH*  dd9  XXXSR\  `&Times New RomanS  0Kl.SampleKQ<6X9`(Courier NewKSR\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKQ<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSR\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable:8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  <6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Ariali)8?OU[agmsyLettersLettersA.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   F)1dxdF)2dxd(O$WA.\  `&Times New Roman  $&XUXXX&bX&XU         (44 @ @Ӏ  1    _ԀAnearliercomplaintwasfiledMarch8,2002.(CT14)  $&XUXXX&bX&XU         (44 @ @Ӏ  2    _Ԁ CTreferstotheClerksTranscriptonAppealfiledApril4,2003. g!&XUXXX&bX&XU            (43  _  MATTHEWZWERLING  ExecutiveDirector  RENEE.TORRES(No.85328)  StaffAttorney  FIRSTDISTRICTAPPELLATEPROJECT  730HarrisonStreet,Suite201   SanFrancisco,CA94107   Telephone:(415)4953119   AttorneysforAppellant    @INTHECOURTOFAPPEALOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA   @ FIRSTAPPELLATEDISTRICT,DIVISIONONE    * ddd Xdd Xdd X  , dt , dd +  :'   C: z z PEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF 2 CALIFORNIA , 0 ЀPlaintiffandRespondent, 8 Ѐv. 8 % , RAMIROJACKLONG %,, 8 ЀDefendantandAppellant. 6,!@C C6No.A101486  2 (SanMateo% / Ԁ%/cCountySuperiorCourt 2 No.SCO51252% 0 %0)(2 C  ( z  zAPPELLANT'SMOTIONFORSUMMARYREVERSAL; P  DECLARATIONOFCOUNSELRENEE.TORRES;REQUEST N! FORIMMEDIATEACTION L "    X Appellant,throughcounsel,requeststhattheCourtsummarily H"$ reversethejudgmentofconvictioninhiscaseonthegroundsthatthe H$& UnitedStatesSupremeCourtslandmarkopinionin Stognerv.California  H&!( (June26,2003)03C.D.O.S.5575,holdingthatprosecutionsunderPenal H(#* Codesection803,subdivision(g)violatethefederal_Constitutions_ԀExPost H*%, FactoClause,requiresreversalinthiscase.Appellantfurtherrequeststhat H,'. theremittiturissueforthwith. H.)0 &  ( X A.0 ` StatementofRelevantProceduralFacts` `   ` OnApril5,2002theSanMateoCountySuperiorCourtfileda30  countinformationchargingRamiroJackLongwithviolationsofsection  288,subdivision(a), alloccurringbetweenJanuary1,1970andMay13,   1972.x   1      ׀ (CT2)y   2      ׀Theinformationfurtherallegedthattheprosecutionwas   undertakenpursuanttoPenalCodesection803,subdivision(g)(3)(III)in   that,amongotherthings, thelimitationperiodspecifiedinsection800or   801hasexpiredastothechargedcrimes. (CT12) 󀀀   ` JurytrialcommencedOctober16,2002.(CT62)OnOctober23,   2002,atthecloseoftheprosecutionscase,20ofthe30countswere   dismissedforinsufficientevidenceontheprosecutorsmotion.(CT9495)   OnOctober25,2002thejuryreturnedguiltyverdictsontheremaining10   countsandfoundtruethespecialallegationconcerningthestatuteof   limitations.(CT190192)OnJanuary3,2003appellantwassentenced   undertheIndeterminateSentencingLawextantin1972totenconsecutive    termsofoneyeartolife.(CT309310,314)  "   ` AtimelynoticeofappealwasfiledJanuary27,2003.(CT217)  TherecordonappealwasfiledApril4,2003.Counselonappealwas  appointedMay29,2003.    B.MotionforSummaryReversal    X Although [_s]ummary_Ԁdeterminationofacriminalappealisvery   '  rare,itisproperwhenthepartiesaregiventheopportunityfororal   argument.(Peoplev._Geitner_(1982)139Cal.App.3d252,254;seealso   Peoplev.Brigham(1979)25Cal.3d283.)Summaryreversalisappropriate   wheretheresultisdeterminedbycontrollingauthorityandspeedy  determinationoftheappealisneeded,thussavingtimeandexpense.See  Peoplev.Browning(1978)79Cal.App.3d320,323.Giventheunusually  clearmandateoftheStogneropinion,appellantwaivesoralargumentifthe  AttorneyGeneralwilldothesame.   (#34"'3"  '32#  1  .3  0   TheStatuteofLimitationsBarisJurisdictionalandCanBe  RaisedfortheFirstTimeonAppeal.'3݌  Ќ     OurstateSupremeCourthasrecentlyreaffirmedthewellsettled ! principlethatbecausethestatuteoflimitationsisjurisdictional,itsbarcan # beinterposedatanytime,includingforthefirsttimeonappeal.(wb&bPeoplev. % ! McGee#&bwb4#wb&bԀ(1934)1Cal.2d611,613;#&bwb#wb&bInre_Demillo_#&bwb#wb&bԀ(1975)14Cal.3d598,601; '"# #&bwbn#wb&bPeoplev._Chadd_#&bwb#wb&bԀ(1981)28Cal.3d739,757#&bwbW#Peoplev.Williams(1999)21 )$% Cal.4th335,341.) [_W]hen_Ԁwb&bthechargingdocumentindicatesonitsface +&' thattheactionistimebarred,apersonconvictedofachargedoffensemay  raisethestatuteoflimitationsatanytime.(Id.,atp.341)  #&bwb-#wb&b ` #&bwbm#Here,therewasgoodreasonnottoraisethestatuteoflimitationsin  thetrialcourt:theCaliforniaSupremeCourt,inPeoplev._Frazer_(1999)wb&bwXUXwbԀ21   Cal.4th737,#&XUXXwXU##&bX&XU#Ԁhadruledthatsection803(g)sresuscitationofexpiredstatutes   oflimitationsdidnotviolatethebanagainstexpostfactolawsandwas   constitutionallyapplicabletocases,suchasappellants,inwhichthestatute   oflimitationshadlongsincerunout.IntheabsenceofUnitedStates  SupremeCourtaction,_Frazer_wasbindingonallCaliforniacourts.  Objectionwouldhavebeenfutile.  2.0 TheStognerOpinion  InStognerv.California,supra,theUnitedStatesSupremeCourt  heldthatapplicationofCaliforniasPenalCodesection803,subdivision  (g),enactedin1994andamendedin1996,to_Stogner_scaseandtothose  like_Stogner_s,violatedthefederalconstitutionsExPostClause.(03C.D.   O.S.atpp.5575,5580.)Section803,subdivision(g), authorizes " prosecutionforcriminalactscommittedmanyyearsbeforehand!andwhere $  theoriginallimitationsperiodhasexpired!aslongasprosecutionbegins &"" withinayearofavictimsfirstcomplainttothepolice.(Id.)Like ($$ Stogner,appellantwaschargedwithcrimesallegedtohavebeencommitted *&& intheearly1970'sand,likeStogner, Californiacouldnothaveprosecuted  appellant,inasmuchasthethenapplicablesixyearstatuteoflimitations  governingthecrimesofwhichappellantwasaccused(andconvicted)had  expired25yearsormore beforethepresentprosecutionwasbrought.   (Id.)   TheUnitesStatesSupremeCourtruledthatsection803(g) threatens   thekindofharmthat,inthisCourtsview,theExPostFactoClauseseeks   toavoid.LongagotheCourtpointedoutthattheClauseprotectslibertyby  preventinggovernmentsfromenactingstatuteswithmanifestlyunjustand  oppressiveretroactiveeffects....[_E]xtending_Ԁalimitationsperiodafterthe  Statehasassuredamanthathehasbecomesafefromitspursuit..seemsto  mostofusunfairanddishonest.[citationomit.]Insuchacase,the  governmenthasrefusedtoplaybyitsownrules,[cit.omit.].Ithas  deprivedthedefendantofthefairwarning,[cit.omit.]thatmighthaveled  himtopreserveexculpatoryevidence.[cit.omit].AndaConstitutionthat   permitssuchanextension,byallowinglegislaturestopickandchoosewhen " toactretroactively,risksbotharbitraryandpotentiallyvindictive $  legislation,anderosionoftheseparationsofpowers.[cit.omit.].(Id.,at &""  p.5576) ($$ TheStognerCourtfounditsinterpretationoftheClauseasapplying   totheresurrectionofexpiredstatutesoflimitations literallywithinthe  categoricaldescriptionsofexpostfactolawssetforthbyJusticeChase  morethan200yearsagoinCalderv.Bull[(1798)3Dall.386,1_L.Ed_.   648]andinthevirtuallyunanimousopinionsof numerouslegislators,   [state]courtsandcommentatorsdatingbacktotheCivilWar.(Id.,atpp.   55765577)ItfoundtheCaliforniaSupremeCourts_Frazer_opiniontobe   theanomaly,pointedlyobservingthat [_t]he_Ԁdissentreferstonocase,  outsideofCalifornia,thathasheld,orevensuggested,thatlaws  resurrectingtimebarredprosecutionsare not expostfacto.(Id.,atp.5580)  AfterStogner,therecanbequestionthatappellantisentitledto  immediaterelief,andreleasefromhisunlawfulimprisonment.  3. TimeisoftheEssence  Notonlyistheerrorclear,buttimeisoftheessence.Appellantwas  sentencedonJanuary3,2003.Asofthatdate,hehadserved302daysin   _presentence_Ԁcustody.(CT315)AsofthefilingofthismotiononJune30, " 2003,hehasservedanadditional178actualdaysinstateprisoncustody, $  foratotalof480actualdaysofcustody.Everyadditionaldayhespendsin &"" custodyis manifestlyunjustandoppressive,andanaffronttotheExPost ($$ FactoClause.(Calderv.Bull,supra;Stognerv.California,supra)For *&& thesereasons,thiscourtshouldactasexpeditiouslyaspossibletoreverse  thejudgmentandissuetheremittiturinthiscase.   X  W(93  Conclusion    X;5  Fortheforegoingreasons,appellantrequeststhattheCourt   summarilyreversethejudgmentofconvictionandissuetheremittitur   forthwith.    6  Dated:June30,20030  0  Respectfullysubmitted,        X    MATTHEWZWERLING     ExecutiveDirector    FirstDistrictAppellateProject     P   RENEE.TORRES    StaffAttorney    AttorneyforAppellant    X7  76@- - " DECLARATIONOFRENEE.TORRES     I,ReneE.Torres,declare:   )(Eh09W KX"'3"  '3c:2Eh  1  .3  0 `   IamamemberoftheBaroftheStateofCaliforniaandastaff  attorneywiththeFirstDistrictAppellateProject.Iwasappointedby   thisCourttorepresentappellantRamiroJackLongonappealon   May29,2003. '3c::݌ ` `  Ќ  "'3"  '3C<2Eh  2  .3  0 `   Ihavespokentotrialcounsel,Barry_Rekoon_,Esq.,andhehas   informedmeheintendstofileahabeaspetitioninthesuperiorcourt   assoonaspossibletosecurethereleaseofappellantLong.  However,asofthetimeofthefilingofthismotion,nosuchpetition  hasbeenfiled.Iamfilingthismotioninthiscourtbecausethe  appealispendinginthiscourtandatthepresenttimesuchamotion  appearstobethemostexpeditiousroutetoreliefformyclient.'3C<p<݌` `  Ќ  "'3"  '3y?2Eh  3  .3  0 `   ݀Iwillinformthecourtimmediatelyifandwhenahabeaspetitionis  filed,orisgranted.'3y??݌ ` `  Ќ  ݀IdeclareunderpenaltyofperjuryunderthelawsoftheStateof " Californiathattheforegoingistrueandcorrect.ExecutedonJune30, $  2003,atSanFrancisco,California. &!"  `     h     򀀀 (#$  `     h     RENEEE.TORRES x  )$%  `     h     StaffAttorney