ÿWPC¿  a„èN`ôr=kÌá¼oø.à ÌMõ±¬ÞËØQÞ[¨c@zÇj´ò¡‚Œ‰MŠw¾9×l5üSÎËPu¤ÄßËÖŸ3º¦õZ+† tí³½,ÖpÕáöP„¼…-OçÜi9GñðÀ ¹8w¾sn}¡¡:Žè¢Yµár'ß ÚÛB°ÙiŠòûâ.wô¸ÊÛ”­¶³Ix¦=3ûضUÆÎ ÆÌ¾‰ov3Û©H*µ#½t§Kâ®»ÊÙ‘lƒzV* …ȰÖíòª¡£J•¬çWÌùÑ”M—F»^Ü®W÷‘÷O¨©¦)“"Ý-lší¹X(âo» ;¤\™ß|ß*¾&‡ÎûøvRpŸðʾ¿eÁR½œ>PH—zŠôtƒÕÄß°kB·iÐjJÕÇ‚4.ÒyÖŸqaƆlÞG£|&Å*Æ=EËÁ´–¶Sý˲Uóo9B0ªbNót£y÷PD±>5ƒ½Àg>„ÊbÀÞÖ‘šÀ[²bÞ ãÃ`¼êF Úç†êõG=cÚ£Ip[R¶‡{ö˜ÈÔ³ìµ&ŸZ(NøXþCŽ¢ý­­0<\Z›L{7O-/+Zy¶Èš áNæD¥¶ºIEž¬7]Aª#ÉüUNÅ % 0Y 0rU 0„^ ´wÀ4ÄØç mééé 0 Ï 0ðϘHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(@øÐ Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(1±Ê$¡¡Ô€ŠÝOˆXXÔÔUSUS.,Ô6n aÿÿ4Heading 1Ô‡XXXÔÔE‡ $New YorkEÔò òÔ  ÔÔ  Ôó óÔE‡ $New YorkEÔÔ‡XXXÔ $New Yorkü©~4— ¡{F4ebsite3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ8MJ ÿÿ6Block TextÓ , ÓÓ , ÓÓ5+4 44` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ 5ÓÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÓ2( ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ 2Ó<ZZ ÿÿ:Normal IndenÓ €dÓÓ à ÓÓ à ÓÓ2(è èè` ¸ hÀpÈ x2ÓÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÓ2( ` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ 2ÓÓ €dÓÝ ƒ±Ê!ÝÔ€Š _ˆXXÔÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ôò òÔ‡ŠÊɈˆŠ _ÔÔ‡X ÎXˆŠÊÉÔÓ  Óó óII.Ð ° ÐÓÓÝ‚ÿÿÿÝÔ€X ÎXXX ÎÔÔ€X ÎXXX ÎÔÔ€XëàXXX ÎÔÔ€X ÎXXXëàÔò òÔ  ÔÝ  Ýó óÓ  ÓÝ‚ÿÿÿÔÝÝ  ÝTHE€JUVENILE€COURT'S€REASONABLE€SERVICES€FINDING€IS€NOT€SUPPORTEDÐ ‡× ÐBY€SUBSTANTIAL€EVIDENCE.݃ԊÝÔ ÐcԌР^® ЌԀX ÎXXX ÎÔÔ€X ÎXXX ÎÔÔ€X ÎXXX ÎÔÔ€X ÎXXX ÎÔÝ  ÝÓ  Óà  àSection€366.21,€subdivision€(f),€also€provides€thatÐ 5… ÐÝ‚ÿÿÿÝÓ dÓÓ àÓÓ àÓÓ<(è èè` ¸ hÀpÈ x°œX<ÓÝ  ÝÓ dÓÝ‚ÿÿÿ?ÝÝ  Ý݃ÿÿ?ÞÝŒÌŒÓ àÓÓ àÓÓ$ °œXèèè` ‰X$ÓÓ ÓÝ  ÝÝ‚ÿÿÿÝÓ ,ÓÓ ,ÓÓ?+4 44` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ °œX?ÓÝ  ÝÝ‚ÿÿÿxÝÝ  ÝThe€court€shall€also€determine€whether€reasonable€servicesÐ ã3 Ðthat€were€designed€to€aid€the€parent€or€legal€guardian€toÐ º  Ðovercome€the€problems€that€led€to€the€initial€removal€andÐ ‘ á Ðcontinued€custody€of€the€child€have€been€provided€or€offeredÐ h ¸ Ðto€the€parent€or€legal€guardian.݃ÿÿxî݌Р?   ÐŒÓ ,ÓÓ ,ÓÓ' °œX444` ‰XÐ 'ÓÝ  Ýà  àWhenever€a€child€is€removed€from€parental€custody,€theÐ  f  Ðjuvenile€court€is€required€to€ensure€that€reasonableÐ í =  Ðreunification€services€are€provided€to€the€family€unless€andÐ Ä  Ðuntil€a€Ô_ÔdetermiÔ_Ô„nation€is€made€pursuant€to€section€361.5Ð ›ë  Ðsubdivision€(b)€that€the€case€falls€within€one€of€the€statutoryÐ r  Ðexceptions€to€the€require„Ô_ÔmentÔ_Ô€that€services€be€provided.€(ðð361.5Ð I™  ÐÔ_ÔsubdÔ_Ô.€(a),€Ô_Ô(cÔ_Ô);€òòIn€re€Jasmine€C.€óó(1999)€70€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€71,€75.)€Ð  p  ÐWhen€reunification€services€are€ordered,€the€reunification€planÐ ùI Ð"must€be€specifically€tailored€to€fit€the€circumstances€of€eachÐ Ð  Ðfamily€[citation],€and€must€be€designed€to€eliminate€thoseÐ §÷ Ðconditions€which€led€to€the€juvenile€court's€jurisdictionalÐ ~Î Ðfinding."€(òòIn€re€Ô_ÔDinoÔ_Ô€E.€óó(1992)€6€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€1768,€1777)€€WhileÐ U¥ Ð"[Ô_Ôr]eunificationÔ_Ô€services€need€not€be€perfect.€(òòElijah€R.€v.Ð .~ ÐSuperior€Courtóó€(1998)€66€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€965,€969),€.€.€.€they€shouldÐ W Ðbe€tailored€to€the€specific€needs€of€the€particular€fam„Ô_ÔilyÔ_Ô.Ð à0 Ð(òòSteve€J.€v.€Superior€Courtóó€(1995)€35€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€798,€810.)"€(òòInÐ · Ðre€Alvin€R.óó€(2003)€108€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€962,€972.)€€"Each€Ô_ÔreunificaÔ_Ô„Ð à ÐÔ_ÔtionÔ_Ô€plan€must€be€appropriate€to€the€particular€individual€andÐ i¹ Ðbased€on€the€unique€facts€of€that€individual.€(òòIn€re€Michael€S.Ð @ Ðóó(1987)€188€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.3d€1448,€1458.)"€(òòIn€re€Ô_ÔMisakoÔ_Ô€R.óó€(1991)€2Ð i ÐÔ_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€538,€545.)€€Ð òB Ðà  àAt€the€six€month€review€hearing€in€this€case,€it€wasÐ É Ðapparent€from€Mr.€Winner's€report€that€Alice€had€serious€problemsÐ  ð  Ðin€comprehending€the€materials€being€presented€in€the€servicesÐ w Ç! Ðprograms€mandated€by€her€service€plan.€(CT€192„193.)€Ð N!ž" ÐConsequently,€the€court€ordered€a€psychological€evaluation€toÐ %"u# Ðdetermine€the€level€of€Alice's€ability€to€function.€(CT€226.)€Ð ü"L$ ÐAlice€cooperated€in€the€psychological€evaluation€and€in€DecemberÐ Ó##% Ð2004,€less€than€two€months€into€the€second€six„monthÐ ª$ú& Ðreunification€period,€the€agency€received€Dr.€Freud's€report.€Ð %Ñ ' ÐThat€report€indicated€that€the€reason€Alice€was€having€so€muchÐ X&¨!( Ðdifficulty€comprehending€the€content€of€the€anger€management€andÐ /'") Ðparenting€classes€was€that€she€had€an€IQ€of€65.€€As€a€result,€sheÐ (V#* Ðhad€a€poor€fund€of€general€knowledge,€did€not€"abstract"€veryÐ Ý(-$+ Ðwell,€had€poor€calculation€skills,€was€limited€her€ability€toÐ ´)%, ÐÔ_ÔrememÔ_Ô„Ô_ÔberÔ_Ô€and€learn€new€material,€and€struggled€with€practicalÐ ‹*Û%- Ðand€so„Ô_ÔcialÔ_Ô€judgment.€€Dr.€Freud€informed€Mr.€Nada€that€Alice'sÐ b+²&. Ðreasoning,€knowledge,€and€judgment€were€impaired€by€thisÐ 9,‰'/ Ðdisability€and€recommended€that€her€reunification€plan€shouldÐ -`(0 Ðtake€these€problems€into€account.€(CT€285.)€€The€agency'sÐ ç-7)1 ÐÔ_Ôresponse€to€this€information€was€to€do€nothing.€€There€were€manyÐ ° Ðthings€that€the€agency€could€have€and€should€have€done€to€tailorÐ ‡× ÐAlice's€reunification€plan€to€meet€her€individual€needs.€Ð ^® ÐInstead,€it€did€nothingÐ 5… Ðà  àFirst,€Mr.€Nada€could€have€made€a€new€referral€to€theÐ  \ Ðregional€center€as€soon€as€he€got€the€report.€€He€did€not€do€so.€Ð ã3 ÐIf€he€truly€believed€that€the€regional€center€was€the€only€agencyÐ º  Ðthat€could€provide€services€to€someone€with€Alice's€condition,Ð ‘ á Ðthen€a€prompt€referral€and€a€new€assessment€was€immediatelyÐ h ¸ Ðcalled€for.€€The€clock€was€running€on€Alice's€reunificationÐ ?   Ðperiod.€€Instead€of€making€a€prompt€referral,€Mr.€Nada€didÐ  f  Ðnothing.€€à ¸ àSecond,€upon€learning€of€Alice's€condition,€Mr.Ð í =  ÐNada€could€have€referred€Alice€to€the€Basic€Life€Skills€ClassesÐ Ä  Ðrecommended€by€the€CASA€in€her€six€month€review€report.€(CT€220.)€Ð ›ë  ÐInstead,€he€did€nothing.Ð r  Ðà  àThird,€Mr.€Nada€could€have€referred€Alice€to€the€DisabilityÐ I™  ÐServices€Department€at€the€junior€college€that€had€beenÐ  p  Ðrecommended€by€the€regional€center€the€first€time€it€assessedÐ ÷G ÐAlice€in€August€2004.€(CT€233.)€€The€regional€center€had€con„Ð Î Ðcluded€that€Alice€had€a€learning€disability€(CT€231)€which€shouldÐ ¥õ Ðhave€been€a€clue€that€Alice€was€unlikely€to€be€able€toÐ |Ì Ðsuccessfully€learn€in€a€program€that€involved€homework€packetsÐ S£ Ðthat€she€was€required€to€complete€and€turn€in,€as€was€the€caseÐ *z Ðwith€the€both€the€parenting€program€and€the€anger€managementÐ Q Ðprogram.€(CT€191,€193.)€€Mr.€Nada€did€not€make€any€changes€inÐ Ø( ÐAlice's€reunification€plan€at€the€six„month€review€hearing€inÐ ¯ÿ Ðresponse€to€this€recommendation€so€that€she€had€some€chance€ofÐ †Ö Ðbeing€able€to€learn€the€material.€€Nevertheless,€when€he€receivedÐ ]­ ÐDr.€Freud's€report€that€indicated€that€Alice€had€troubleÐ 4„ Ðremembering€and€learning€new€material€because€of€her€disability,Ð  [ Ðhe€certainly€should€have€considered€a€referral€to€the€DisabilityÐ â2 ÐServices€Department€at€the€junior€college€as€a€way€to€addressÐ ¹  Ðthis€problem.€€Instead,€he€did€nothing.€Ð à  Ðà  àFourth,€if€Mr.€Nada€thought€that€it€was€so€important€forÐ g ·! ÐAlice€to€get€separate€housing,€even€though€he€knew€she€could€notÐ >!Ž" Ðget€a€job€because€of€her€poor€skills,€he€could€have€referred€herÐ "e# Ðto€a€vocational€training€program€for€the€disabled€where€she€couldÐ ì"<$ Ðlearn€some€job€skills€as€was€recommended€by€the€CASA€in€her€six„Ð Ã#% Ðmonth€review€report.€(CT€220.)€€Instead,€he€did€nothing.Ð š$ê& Ðà  àFifth,€Mr.€Nada€could€have€referred€Alice€to€an€in„homeÐ q%Á ' Ðsupport€program€that€could€come€into€the€grandmother's€home€whereÐ H&˜!( Ðthe€children€were€being€cared€for€during€the€day€and€demonstrateÐ 'o") Ðparenting€skills€as€was€recommended€by€the€parent„ing€classÐ ö'F#* Ðcounselor€in€a€February€8,€2005€letter€to€Mr.€Nada.€(CT€279„280.)€Ð Í($+ ÐInstead,€he€did€nothing.Ð ¤)ô$, Ðà  àSixth,€having€received€the€information€on€February€8,€2005Ð {*Ë%- Ðthat€Alice€had€not€really€benefited€from€the€parenting€class,€Mr.Ð R+¢&. ÐNada€could€have€referred€Alice€to€the€Parent€Resource€Center€forÐ ),y'/ Ðfurther€assistance€and€with€an€explanation€of€her€special€needsÐ -P(0 Ðas€recommended€by€the€children's€counsel€and€the€initial€socialÐ ×-')1 Ðworker€at€the€disposition€hearing.€(RT€11.)€Ð ° Ðà  àSeventh,€Mr.€Nada€could€have€provided€a€copy€of€Dr.€Freud'sÐ ‡× Ðreport€to€Alice's€attorney€as€soon€as€he€got€it€and€asked€him€forÐ ^® Ðsuggestions€as€to€how€to€deal€with€regional€center€and€what€elseÐ 5… Ðshould€be€done€to€address€Alice's€disability.€€Instead,€he€didÐ  \ Ðnothing.Ð ã3 Ðà  àIn€April,€after€being€prompted€by€county€counsel,€who€wasÐ º  Ðprompted€by€Alice's€counsel,€Mr.€Nada€finally€submitted€Dr.Ð ‘ á ÐFreud's€report€to€the€regional€center.€€When€the€regional€centerÐ h ¸ Ðagain€responded,€on€April€16,€2005,€that€Alice€was€not€eligibleÐ ?   Ðfor€its€services€but€asked€for€more€information,€Mr.€Nada€didÐ  f  Ðnothing.€(RT€30.)€€He€did€not€attempt€to€obtain€the€requestedÐ í =  Ðrecords.€€He€did€not€contact€counsel€and€ask€that€counsel€obtainÐ Ä  Ðthe€requested€records.€€Instead,€he€did€nothing.€€Again,€if€theÐ ›ë  Ðregional€center€was€indeed€the€only€agency€that€could€provideÐ r  Ðservices€to€someone€with€Alice's€disability,€it€would€seem€that€aÐ I™  Ðprompt€response€to€the€regional€center's€request€was€called€for.€Ð  p  ÐAt€that€point,€Alice€had€completed€both€of€the€required€classesÐ ÷G Ðand€was€receiving€no€court„ordered€services€of€any€kind.€€If€Mr.Ð Î ÐNada€believed€that€Alice's€completion€of€those€classes€wasÐ ¥õ Ðinsufficient€to€justify€returning€her€children€to€her€custody,€itÐ |Ì Ðwas€incumbent€upon€him€to€locate€and€provide€additional€servicesÐ S£ Ðthat€would€enable€Alice€to€learn€the€things€he€felt€she€needed€toÐ *z Ðlearn€in€order€to€get€her€children€back.€€Instead,€he€didÐ Q Ðnothing.Ð Ø( Ðà  àMr.€Nada's€failure€to€inform€counsel€of€the€April€letterÐ ¯ÿ Ðdenying€eligibility€but€asking€for€additional€information€hadÐ †Ö Ðanother€adverse€effect€on€Alice.€€Because€counsel€did€not€know€ofÐ ]­ Ðthe€new€denial,€counsel€was€not€in€a€position€to€advise€AliceÐ 4„ Ðconcerning€her€right€to€appeal€the€regional€center's€decision.Ð  [ Ð(RT€32.)€€Alice€was€required€to€exercise€her€appeal€rights€withinÐ â2 Ð30€days€of€the€decision.€(ðð4710.5.)€€Had€Mr.€Nada€informedÐ ¹  ÐAlice's€counsel€of€the€April€2005€letter€from€the€regionalÐ à  Ðcenter,€counsel€could€have€filed€an€appeal€on€Alice's€behalf€andÐ g ·! Ðthe€matter€might€have€been€resolved€in€mediation,€an€informalÐ >!Ž" Ðmeeting,€or€other€administrative€proceedings€before€the€twelve„Ð "e# Ðmonth€review€hearing.€€However,€instead€of€contacting€counsel,Ð ì"<$ ÐMr.€Nada€did€nothing.Ð Ã#% Ðà  àIt€is€important€to€note€that€Mr.€Nada€was€not€prevented€fromÐ š$ê& Ðtaking€further€steps€to€tailor€the€reunification€plan€to€Alice'sÐ q%Á ' Ðneeds€by€the€fact€that€the€case€was€between€the€six€and€theÐ H&˜!( Ðtwelve„month€reviews€when€he€received€the€psychologicalÐ 'o") Ðevaluation.€€Section€16501.1€sets€forth€the€social€worker'sÐ ö'F#* Ðobligations€insofar€as€case€plans€are€concerned.€€Subdivision€(d)Ð Í($+ Ðof€that€statute€provides€that€case€plans€must€be€updated€at€leastÐ ¤)ô$, Ðevery€six€months€in€conjunction€with€each€status€review€hearingÐ {*Ë%- Ðheld€pursuant€to€section€366.21,€but€it€also€requires€that€theÐ R+¢&. Ðcase€plan€must€be€updated€as€the€needs€of€the€child€and€familyÐ ),y'/ Ðdictate.€€Subdivision€(d)(12)€provides€that€the€case€plan€must€beÐ -P(0 Ðincluded€in€the€court€report€and€considered€at€each€reviewÐ ×-')1 Ðhearing,€but€specifically€provides€that€modifications€to€the€caseÐ ° Ðplan€made€during€the€period€between€review€hearings€need€not€beÐ ‡× Ðapproved€by€the€court€if€the€social€worker's€supervisorÐ ^® Ðdetermines€that€the€modifications€further€the€goals€of€the€plan.€Ð 5… ÐThus,€Mr.€Nada€was€required€by€section€16501.1,€subdivision€(d)Ð  \ Ðto€update€the€case€plan€when€he€learned€to€Alice's€disabilityÐ ã3 Ðfrom€Dr.€Freud€in€December€and€he€was€not€required€to€get€courtÐ º  Ðpermission€to€modify€the€plan€so€long€as€he€had€supervisoryÐ ‘ á Ðapproval€to€do€so.€€Instead,€he€did€nothing.Ð h ¸ Ðà  àIt€appears€that€the€agency€and€perhaps€the€court€wereÐ ?   Ðproceeding€on€the€assumption€that€all€the€agency€had€to€do€for€aÐ  f  Ðparent€who€is€mentally€impaired€is€to€make€a€referral€to€theÐ í =  Ðregional€center€and€if€the€regional€center€decides€not€to€doÐ Ä  Ðanything,€they€have€done€their€duty€to€provide€reasonableÐ ›ë  Ðservices.€€To€the€extent€that€the€agency€may€be€relying€on€òòIn€reÐ r  ÐVictoria€M.€óó(1989)€207€Cal.App.3d€1317,€a€case€in€which€thisÐ K›  Ðcourt€found€that€the€same€agency€had€failed€to€provide€reasonableÐ $t  Ðservices€to€a€developmentally€disabled€mother€because€it€did€notÐ ûK Ðrefer€her€to€the€regional€center,€that€reliance€is€misplaced.€Ð Ò" ÐWhile€this€court€did€find€that€the€failure€to€refer€that€motherÐ ©ù Ðto€the€regional€center€was€a€failure€to€provide€reasonableÐ €Ð Ðservices,€it€also€found€that,€even€though€many€other€servicesÐ W§ Ðwere€offered€to€the€mother,€those€services€were€inadequateÐ .~ Ðbecause€no€accommo„dation€was€made€for€the€mother's€special€needsÐ U Ðeven€though€everyone€was€aware€that€the€mother€had€mentalÐ Ü, Ðlimitations.€(òòId.óó€at€p.€1329.)€€"In€light€of€[the€mother's]Ð ³ Ðlimitations,€the€services€offered€were€insufficient."€(òòId.óó€at€p.Ð ŒÜ Ð1330.)€Ð eµ Ðà  àIn€this€case,€the€county€counsel€argued€that€the€regionalÐ <Œ Ðcenter€was€the€only€way€the€agency€could€provide€services€to€aÐ c Ðparent€with€mental€limitations€was€to€refer€to€them€to€theÐ ê: Ðregional€center.€(RT€25„25.)€€The€juvenile€court€concluded€thatÐ Á Ðbecause€the€regional€center€continued€to€insist€that€Alice€didÐ ˜è  Ðnot€qualify€for€its€services,€there€were€no€other€servicesÐ o ¿! Ðavailable€to€address€Alice's€limited€capabilities€and€thatÐ F!–" Ðreasonable€services€were€therefore€provided€to€her.€(RT€36„37.)€Ð "m# ÐAs€we€have€seen,€this€finding€is€not€supported€by€the€record.€Ð ô"D$ ÐThe€record€shows€that€several€other€professionals€Ô_ÔrecommendedÐ Ë#% Ðother€services€to€Mr.€Nada€that€could€have€assisted€someone€withÐ ¢$ò& ÐAlice's€disabilities,€including€the€Disability€Services€Center€atÐ y%É ' Ðthe€junior€college,€the€Leaps€and€Bounds€in„home€support€program,Ð P& !( Ðvocational€training€programs€for€the€disabled,€the€ParentÐ ''w") ÐResource€Center,€and€Life€Skills€Classes.€€But€instead€ofÐ þ'N#* Ðinvestigating€the€availability€of€these€services€or€makingÐ Õ(%$+ Ðreferrals€to€them,€Mr.€Nada€did€nothing.Ð ¬)ü$, Ðà  àWhile€a€referral€to€the€regional€center€is€certainly€appro„Ð ƒ*Ó%- ÐÔ_ÔpriateÔ_Ô€in€cases€where€the€parent€appears€to€have€limited€mentalÐ Z+ª&. Ðcapacity,€the€refusal€of€the€regional€center€to€provide€servicesÐ 1,'/ Ðdoes€not€relieve€the€agency€of€its€obligation€to€make€Ô_ÔaccommodaÔ_Ô„Ð -X(0 ÐÔ_ÔtionsÔ_Ô€for€that€parent's€limitations€when€designing€and€implement„Ð ß-/)1 ÐÔ_ÔingÔ_Ô€the€reunification€plan.€€Such€accommodations€could€have€andÐ ° Ðshould€have€been€made€for€Alice's€disability€in€the€programs€thatÐ ‡× Ðwere€part€of€her€reunification€plan.€€Instead€of€tailoring€theÐ ^® Ðpar„Ô_ÔentingÔ_Ô€class€and€anger€management€classes€for€someone€whoÐ 5… Ðcannot€read€and€write€very€well€(as€the€parenting€skillsÐ  \ Ðcounselor€did€in€òòVictoria€M.,€supraóó,€207€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.3d€at€p.€1329),Ð ã3 ÐAlice€was€given€written€homework€and€then€criticized€when€sheÐ ¼  Ðcould€not€complete€the€assignments€correctly.€(CT€193.)€€Ð “ ã Ðà  àIn€òòDavid€B.€v.€Superior€Court,óó€òòsupraóó,€the€court€faulted€theÐ j º Ðagency€for€doing€something€very€similar€when€it€claimed€that€itÐ C “  Ðhad€provided€the€father€with€reasonable€services€in€findingÐ  j  Ðhousing€by€providing€him€with€a€list€of€housing€resources€withoutÐ ñ A  Ðtaking€into€account€that€he€could€not€read€the€list€because€heÐ È  Ðwas€illiterate.€(123€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€at€p.€791.)€€Because€no€otherÐ Ÿï  Ðservices€that€were€tailored€to€Alice's€disabilities€were€offeredÐ vÆ  Ðor€provided,€there€is€simply€no€evidence€to€support€the€court'sÐ M  Ðfinding€that€reasonable€services€were€provided€in€this€case.Ð $t  Ѐà  àBefore€the€juvenile€court€may€find€that€reasonable€servicesÐ ûK Ðhave€been€provided,€the€Ð Ò" ÐÝ‚ÿÿÿÝÓ ,ÓÓ ,ÓÓ?+4 44` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ °œX?ÓÝ  ÝÝ‚ÿÿÿØLÝÝ  Ý݃ÿÿØLNMÝŒÌŒÓ ,ÓÓ ,ÓÓ' °œX444` ‰XÐ 'ÓÝ  ÝÝ‚ÿÿÿÝÓ ,ÓÓ ,ÓÓ?+4 44` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ °œX?ÓÝ  ÝÝ‚ÿÿÿÕMÝÝ  Ýthe€record€should€show€that€the€supervising€agency€Ô_ÔidenÔ_Ô„Ð €Ð ÐÔ_ÔtifiedÔ_Ô€the€problems€leading€to€the€loss€of€custody,€offeredÐ W§ Ðservices€designed€to€remedy€those€problems,€maintainedÐ .~ Ðreasonable€contact€with€the€parents€during€the€course€of€theÐ U Ðservice€plan,€and€made€reasonable€efforts€to€assist€the€par„Ð Ü, ÐÔ_ÔentsÔ_Ô€in€areas€where€compliance€proved€difficult€(such€asÐ ³ Ðhelping€to€provide€transportation€and€offering€more€Ô_ÔintenÔ_Ô„Ð ŠÚ ÐÔ_ÔsiveÔ_Ô€rehabilitation€services€where€others€have€failed).€ÝƒÿÿÕMKN݌Рa± ÐŒÓ ,ÓÓ ,ÓÓ' °œX444` ‰XÐ 'ÓÝ  Ý(òòDavid€B.€v.€Superior€Court,€supraóó,€123€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.4th€at€pp€793„794Ð 8ˆ Ð[quoting€òòIn€re€Ô_ÔRivaÔ_Ô€M.óó€(1991)€235€Ô_ÔCal.AppÔ_Ô.3d€403,€414].)€€TheÐ a Ðagency€made€no€effort€to€offer€services€that€were€designed€toÐ ê: Ðremedy€the€problems€caused€by€Alice's€disability.€€It€madeÐ Á Ðabsolutely€no€effort€to€assist€Alice€in€those€areas€whereÐ ˜è  Ðcompliance€proved€difficult€because€of€her€disabilities.€€It€gaveÐ o ¿! Ðher€standard€reunification€services€designed€for€people€ofÐ F!–" Ðaverage€intelligence€and€made€no€attempts€to€find€other€servicesÐ "m# Ðor€redesign€the€services€already€offered€when€it€became€clear€sixÐ ô"D$ Ðmonths€into€the€case€that€Alice€lacked€the€intellectual€abilityÐ Ë#% Ðto€benefit€from€those€services.€€That€being€the€case,€the€court'sÐ ¢$ò& Ðfinding€that€the€agency€provided€reasonable€services€designed€toÐ y%É ' Ðovercome€the€problems€that€caused€Alice€to€continue€to€beÐ P& !( Ðdeprived€of€the€custody€of€her€children€is€not€supported€byÐ ''w") Ðsubstantial€evidence€and€must€be€reversed.ò òÔ#†X'XXXX Î_#ÔÔ#†Š _ˆXX'X~#Ô