WPCc Gb ;x*:գL=8:e؀u+MF=b6OzFMC;alL3=<#o#;j1pgӈC&"<8]~5 6@ [n< o5w[QcN 9,jD*RfF烨8ަ(~&Rىn8gϻK{]N:'a0RRSo;I̬Mjt jW7ghoeFQM}lMF 0nJ 0< 08U >, 0ij 0i 0< 01 0@ Cfa B B   0$( 0 r 0  04 1 0Cr^ w44 m 1" M N M f a ; 0<H! " 0=" 0F" 0P# 0Zn# 0d# 72,$ 0w^$$ 0U% 1% 1w& 0c& B a' B'' 72' B 'b(((( 0( B*) B) B)*# *UN, %7- 0=-N-M- 01- 0=. 0`?. 0c. 1/f/ 0</ 0/ 1u0 01 11 0>n2 02 0v3 0*4 0a4 0?5 05 096 06 027 07 0:8 1$9 0_9 0  : 0k; 1< 0= D3> C? D+? 0E? 0 A 06A 0)B 0:1C 0hkC 0FCU6DU*ODMyDM}DMD 1DMTEMXEM\E 08`EME(E 72E 72E 0c(F(F 0FbPG 0XG 0H 0H 0I 00J 0J8xK 0S 0uT 0FU 0UU 0V 0MW 0W 0X 0Y 0Y 0mZ 0;[ 0[ 0\ 09] 0]] 1o^ 0^ 0_ D/` D/A` 1ep`p`p` 72`aaaaaaaaU @aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0N[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a[a AYaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab 0Fb<:Default ParaXXXXXX<:footnote ref2.C0Level 1  X<(` ` hp x X<   X<(` ` hp x X< \  `&Times New Roman.n,toc 1  X 2(` ` hp x 2    2( ` hp x 2  XXX  .n,toc 2   2(  hp x 2    2( ` hp x 2  XXX  604Body Text  X   XXX  6&)4Hyperlink            :Wl8Body Text 2  X<(` X` hp x X< D`D`  X<(` X` hp x X< D`D` '  $  FDAP MIS(0Jonathan Soglin .    dTable_A  d1  da5<J:signaturepld  &8(0&XXX  &8(0&http://www.fdap.org/downloads/seminar-criminal/seminar_1_04_exhaustion_pet_materials.pdf(2j;$ Fb-!X+XXDX  XX+  QuickMarkhttp://www.fdap.org/downloads/blakely/Shepard.pdf#page=6(3$ Fb-!X+XXDX  XX+  &c$""0 (EGMSY_ekqAutoList121.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.($    Ϝ>4 EEE[3:0.=BackupU0eEGMSY_ekqAutoList11I.1 I.I.I.I.I.I.Table_Cpage page chapter volume footnote endnote <V:2 Spacing Pl  2( p x(02XXX  2( p x(02)*+,-($0 ($0 0 (($0 0 0 (2$0 0 0 0 (<$0 0 0 0 0  (O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5*+ (_2623  ..(EGMSY_ekqAutoList131.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(EGMSY_ekqAutoList141.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(;s$2#  a  .3  0  d2 d  Sd@- -http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/rules/titleone/title1-2-17.htm#TopOfPage(2$ Fb-!X+XXDX  XX+    0  &$ d d% %dK Kd3|KHP LaserJet 1200 Series PCL 60&d9 Z6Times New Roman RegularDX(fb-$  0.Normal<:Definition T,*None  X  X(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (uhCEKQW]cioAutoList51.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.<:Footnote Tex*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)<GD:Definition L , ;1` hp x (#;  8.` hp x (#80lCEIMSY_ekAutoList61aa.A.A.A.A.A.86Definition('z&H1      XXX(o&H2  XXX(o&H3  XXX(&H4 XXX XXX(o&H5  XXX(o&H6  XXX20Address8SP6Blockquote , , ;1` hp x (#;   8.` hp x (#8,*CITE,dl*CODEKp<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis( CEKQW]cioAutoList9A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.<:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard Kp<6X9`(Courier NewK XXXS\  `&Times New RomanS<:Preformatted/%  ,Kk (#/Kp<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk (#/0գEGMSY_ekqAutoList101.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.<:zBottom of Ifg4$ ** ddI  B    ?q%2A`Arial?9hg*  dd9  XXXS\  `&Times New RomanS  ????'dxddd'dxd<:zTop of ForIfg4$** ddI  B    ?q%2A`Arial?9hg*  dd9  XXXS\  `&Times New RomanS  0Kl.SampleKp<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKp<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable:8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  <6X9`(Courier New%2A`ArialRX37;AM]q11 1.1.11.1.1.11.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.186searchtermQi)u1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1(;3$2#  0  .3  0  *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  - -*5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x    SECREASESolano LWOPGuinncarjackingSchmierPadillaCal.R.CtLanzettaBatchelder SipeTuilaepaHarmelinsentencerVaccoKaslerLockyer T]heoverinclusive underinclusiveBuffingtonNewlandT]here S.CtE]videnceHolguinANDRIANSonoma MCRDrautDancyStricklandXXXXXBELFIOREcaselawParrottQuinonesGineseKonoctipedophilicRickyParadisPedophilia J.C.ClearlakeCloverdaleEasonmentoredEastlakeKostoffBudwellEquivelSheppard T]oOAthat that OpnBurrellAlvarado A]n suaspontecodefendantGuiuanEllarda]lthoughCoffmanb]ecausedispositiveexamin[eda]ppellantSilvanoEgelhoffKennardWasson Exsprotect[ingElseyBrevermanCal.AppGaudinYatesEvattXXXXXXWitkinCal.Criminal h]isStowell i]fEquartewaivabilitynonrecordHerreraYurkos]inceWinshipDunlapDolge h]eq]uestions i]tRynerHammelmannCrim.L.RevReadback*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h 0?OU[agmsyLettersLettersA.1.A.A.A.A.A.A.()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   ?)1dxd?)2dxd 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.A.Table_A(A Z(Times New Roman (O$O  , deUULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(n$ (  1  ) Fb-!X+XXDX  XX+  _   SampleargumentforuseinaPost-Blackpetitionforreviewraisinga  Blakelyclaimastouppertermaggravatingfactors.   Note1:Thesampleisnecessarilyskeletalandwillhavetobetailoredto  eachcase.Thesampleidentifiesthelegalerror(denialofajury,application  ofwrongburdenofproof,etc.),butafiledpetitionwillhavetomore   completelyidentify(i.e.exhaust)therelevantfacts,proceduralhistory,and   nuancesofthecase.   Note2:Inconnectionwiththeoptionalparagraphregardingrecidivist    factors,thememoonShepardv.U.S.foundhere:   4 O  5  http://www.fdap.org/downloads/blakely/Shepard.pdf#page=66OF  7 ,containsa   moredetailedanalysisofthenarrowinterpretationof_Almendarez_-Torres.]   Note3:Giventhebrevityofthesample,thedistinct necessityforreview   and argumentsectionsoftenusedinpetitionsforreviewareconsolidated.  Whetherthisisappropriateinaparticularcasemaydependonwhether  thereareadditionalissuesraisedinthepetition.  Note4(addedAug.8,2005):Thesampleassumesthatthepetitionmight  presentotherissues.Ifnotandifyouintendtofilethepetitionasan   exhaustionpetition,youmustcomplywiththerequirementsof4; $O  5  rule33.36OF  7 $ ,  asdescribedatinthisJanuary2004(updatedMarch2004)4 O  5  article6OF  7 :  http://_www.fdap.org_/downloads/seminar-criminal/seminar_1_04_exhaustio  n_pet_materials.pdf   _ `     h   0p x X0 Qe e -IntheSupremeCourtoftheStateofCalifornia   B( ` hp x XB `     h      p 0p x X0QD*  ddd Xdd Xdd X  ,/ jj, jj+  :'    :B( ` hp x XB PeopleoftheStateofCalifornia ,   ̀PlaintiffandRespondent,    ̀v.    ______________________ ,   ̀DefendantandAppellant.   E2! dE  S_____________   CourtofAppealNo.A_________   (_________CountySuperior   Courtno.%  ___________%)   B  B86   d B   PetitionforReview   AfterDecisionbytheCourtofAppeal ! FirstAppellateDistrict,Division______ " Filed_______,2005 # 򀀀 %   [attorneyname] $ + (StateBarNo.________) %!, [attorneyaddress] &"- [attorneyphonenumber] '#. AttorneyforAppellant ($/   %  % 0p x X0  *&1 :8DDdd8  Qe e -IntheSupremeCourtoftheStateofCalifornia   B( ` hp x XB `     h      p 0p x X0QD*rN dd/ jj/ jj   r,/ jj, jj+  :'  :B( ` hp x XB PeopleoftheStateofCalifornia ,   ̀PlaintiffandRespondent,   ̀v.     _____________,    ̀DefendantandAppellant.    E2!  dE  S_____________   CourtofAppealNo.A________   (AlamedaCountySuperiorCourt   No.____________)     B86   d B    PetitionforReview  G       To: ` TheChiefJustice,andtotheAssociateJusticesoftheCalifornia  SupremeCourt:     XAppellantrespectfullypetitionsthisCourttoreviewthe " __________,2005,unpublishedopinionoftheCourtofAppeal(First $ AppellateDistrict,Division_________)affirmingappellantsconvictions & andsentence.(Appendix( App.)A). !(  X   ****  #*  X X   &   QuestionsPresented      n  K Q(#33Q ,DoesimpositionofanuppertermsentenceunderCalifornias  DeterminateSentencingLawviolatetherightstoajurytrialandproof  beyondareasonabledoubtwhenthesentenceisbaseduponjudicialfact   findingofaggravatingfactorswhichwereneitheradmittedbythedefendant   norfoundtruebythejury? '     ,7OY ,      , &   ProceduralBackground      ' ,'[stateproceduralhistoryofcase,includingappellateproceedingonthe  theBlakelyclaim]  A  ,Q &   FactualBackground  9   '-   (e03Q  ,[statetherelevantfactualbackground,includingsentencing  facts/evidencerelevanttotheBlakelyclaim.]    ,F NecessityforReview 6   !  I.  TheImpositionofanUpperTermSentenceViolatedBlakelyv.  WashingtonandAppellant'sFederalConstitutionalRightstoaJury   Trial(SixthAmendment)andDueProcess(FourteenthAmendment).    ! k!_! ,LikemanysentencesnowpendingonappealinCalifornia,the   impositionoftheaggravatedterminthiscaseviolatedtheSixth   Amendmentanddueprocess.(Blakelyv.Washington(2004)542U.S.296,   124S.Ct.2531.)Blakelyv.Washingtonappliestofactfindingon   aggravatingcircumstancesnecessaryforimpositionofanuppertermunder  California'sDeterminateSentencingLaw.  AppellantrecognizesthatonJune20,2005,thisCourtheldthatthereis  nofederalconstitutionalrighttoajurytrialonfact-findingrelatingto  aggravatingfactorsusedtoimposetheuppertermunderCalifornia's  DeterminateSentencingLaw.(Peoplev.Black(2005)35Cal.4th1238,  29Cal.Rptr.3d740,113P.3d534.)Appellantneverthelessmakesthis   argumenttopreserveitforfederalcourtreview. "  ," ,BecausethisCourtisundoubtedlyalreadyfamiliarwiththecore $  argument,appellantwillforegoanyextendedexplanationastowhyBlack &!" wasdecidedincorrectly.Appellantwillonlybrieflysummarizetherationale (#$  forBlakely'sapplicationtoCaliforniaupperterms. *%& InBlakelyv.Washington,124S.Ct.2531,theCourtheldthat,where   statelawestablishesapresumptivesentenceforaparticularoffenseand  authorizesagreatertermonlyifcertainadditionalfactsarefound(beyond  thoseinherentinthepleaorjuryverdict),theSixthandFourteenth   Amendmentsentitlethedefendanttojurydeterminationofthoseadditional   factsbyproofbeyondareasonabledoubt.(Blakely,124S.Ct.at2537.)   BecausethemiddletermisthepresumptivesentenceunderCalifornia's   DeterminateSentenceLawandadefendantmayonlyreceiveanupperterm  if aggravatingcircumstancesarefound(Pen.Code1170(b)),the  Californiasentencingschemeforjudicialdeterminationofthosefactsunder  apreponderancestandardsuffersfromthesameconstitutionaldefectsasthe  WashingtonregimereviewedinBlakely.  ThesentencingcourtviolatedBlakelybyimposinganuppertermbased  onitsownfindingsofaggravatingfactsnotadmittedintheplea.Under  ApprendiandBlakely, Otherthanthefactofapriorconviction,anyfact   thatincreasesthepenaltyforacrimebeyondtheprescribedstatutory " maximummustbesubmittedtoajury,andprovedbeyondareasonable $  doubt.(Apprendiv.NewJersey,(2000)_530_ԀU.S.6666466,atp.490;Blakelyv. &"" Washington,supra,124S.Ct.atp.2536.)Inthiscase,thecourtreliedon ($$  [insertnumberofaggravatingfactorshere]aggravatingfactors:[identify *&& aggravatingfactorshere].(RTOct.15,2004at8.)Appellantspleadidnot  admitanyoftheseaggravatingcircumstances.           [ OptionalParagraph :Itistruethat___ofthe___aggravatingfactors  foundpresentwererelatedtorecidivism.TheAlmendarez-Torresv.United   States(1998)523US224exceptiontotherighttoajurytrial,however,   doesnotapply.Thatexceptionisreadverynarrowlyandappliesonlytothe   merefactofapriorconviction.Shepardv.UnitedStates(2005)125S.Ct.   1254,1262(pluralityopn.).)Theso-called recidivistfactorspresentin  thiscasefalloutsideoftheAlmendarez-Torresexceptionbecausetheygo  beyondthemerefactofapriorconviction.Inanyevent,thereappeartobe  enoughvotesontheUnitedStatesSupremeCourttooverrule  Almendarez-Torres.(Apprendi,530U.S.at520-521(Thomas,J.,concur.);  Shepard,125S.Ct.at1264(Thomas,J.,concur.).)]  Thecourtsfindingsontheaggravatingfactorsareexactlythekindof  offense-relatedaggravatingfactorswhichApprendiandBlakelyentrusttoa   jury.Inviewofthesentencingcourtsfindingofaggravatingfactors,the " courtsselectionoftheuppertermwastaintedbyBlakelyerrorandrenders $  appellantssentenceunconstitutional. &""  ,"' ($$    &    Conclusion A7 B  ӍCONCLUSIONC    6    ,AppellantrespectfullyurgesthisCourttograntreview. -} 7 ,7 XS -}  XG8*r$% dd/ jj/ jj N  r, 55, 55+  @-- }- }  d@7E1` hp x XE 0Dated:____________,2005 K8'9 d dK 0  H( ` hp x X XH    E1` hp x XE XRespectfullysubmitted, 9    9      9    9  _______________________ 9  [attorneyname] 9   0  AttorneysforAppellant' 7B869 1  d B 0 X  u     CertificateofWordCount A<        ` Counselforappellantherebycertifiesthatthisbriefconsistsof   _________ words(excludingtables,proofofservice,andthiscertificate),  accordingtothewordcountofthecomputerwordprocessingprogram.   (Cal.RulesofCourt,rule28.1.)   *=H=___________,20050  0h  0h h 0  ___________________________6     `      h     [attorneyname]