WPCW ͳBDH@5H2uH@׳7:WV}ZMn~S3'ILB+ؐSyS18I`37!rtBdGYBmkB=K'&8"(nN֙t24<ϱKfZS~(>JO V̚ DHZ!Q,t lR2A@}.Βli njd4NDxv 3f$ӁmHv4 壿8v,s$kfbQ\=AJ~9묱AgW=\~칁е_q=PX&h%c|3xrgZN[ )񂪖PҲ@AB'w[jG5OoDwcV}_p U6 0 |U> 0n 0B4 0v 0: 05 U.1 0:_   0 B 0C  0:  0#UN %M(N^ w&4*> m@<6X9`(Courier New' CASE NO AB0jonathan .   <ld:Default ParaS\  `&Times New RomanSXXXK<6X9`(Courier NewK\  `&Times New Roman< :Footnote TexXXX<:Footnote Ref0> .Footer  >4X` hp x >:8Page Number<\d:documentbodyC  $VerdanaCXXXK<6X9`(Courier NewK $Verdana42Emphasis   )..      XgnXXXXZXXXgn  _!  X!    (2$ ò!..      XgnXXXXZXXXgn   d($      ò!..      XgnXXXXZXXXgn  _<( ` hp x X<xXXZ      ,x  1  N  ݀ThisdissueiscurrentlypendingbeforetheUnited  StatesSupremeCourtinCunninghamv.California  (No.056551),cert._grtd_.,򀀀U.S.򀀀(Feb.21,  2006)./݌  ЌXZX  xXXZ  6  xdXZX(2V$ ò!..      XgnXXXXZXXXgn  ZXXXZ  0  #|x(ò$..      XgnXXXXZXXXgnCENTRAL OFFICE0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularXR6 OV.6ebsiteU ò!..      XgnXXXXZXXXgn  _        XX8ZXXdd8 XXZ  CASENO.    h     INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA X     THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  ) `  CALIFORNIA,   h     ) ( x  `     h     )  @ ЀPlaintiffandRespondent,  )CaseNo.B186622    Ѐ `     h     )    v. `     h     )LosAngelesSupCt. H    `     h     )CaseNo.SA05609001 `   `     h     ) (  _LANDU_ԀMICHAEL_MVUEMBA_,    )    `     h     ) h  ЀDefendantandPetitioner.  ) 0   `     h     ) H  Ѐ       @..@..@..@..  PETITIONFORREVIEW r @..@..@..@..    PetitionfromanUnpublishedDecisionof Q theSecondDistrictCourtofAppeal,First F Division,AfteraJudgmentofConvictionfromthe ; LosAngelesSuperiorCourt 0      ' x X'  B( ` hp x X B `     h Stephen_Temko_,Esq.,SBN#67785 $ '   р `     h 1620FifthAvenue,#800 % ( Ѐ    h SanDiego,California92101 M&!)  X 9" hp x X 9(858)2743538 'e"*   X B( ` hp x X B `     h X 9" hp x X 9AttorneyforPetitioner (#,  X B( ` hp x X B `     h _LANDU_ԀMICHAEL_MVUEMBA_ m)$-  `     h ByappointmentoftheCourt *M&/  `     h ofAppealundertheCalifornia +'0  `     h AppellateProjectIndependent ,'1  `     h CaseSystem  U-(2          CASENO.    h     INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA X     THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF  ) `  CALIFORNIA,   h     ) ( x  `     h     )  @ ЀPlaintiffandRespondent,  )CaseNo.B186622    Ѐ `     h     )    v. `     h     )LosAngelesSupCt. F  H    `     h     )CaseNo.SA05609001 F  `   `     h     ) (  _LANDU_ԀMICHAEL_MVUEMBA_,    )    `     h     ) h  ЀDefendantandPetitioner.  ) 0   `     h     ) H  Ѐ       @..@..@..@..  PETITIONFORREVIEW r @..@..@..@.. TOTHEHONORABLERONALDGEORGE,CHIEFJUSTICE,AND Q TOTHEHONORABLEASSOCIATEJUSTICESOFTHE F CALIFORNIASUPREMECOURT: ;    ` Petitioner_LANDU_ԀMICHAEL_MVUEMBA_ 0 ("Petitioner")herebypetitionsthishonorable  CourtforreviewpursuanttotheCaliforniaRules P ofCourt,Rules28and29. 0     STATEMENTOFTHECASE  e"   X  Followingajurytrial,Petitionerwas Z#! convictedofrape,sodomy,attemptedforcibleoral $: " copulation,andcommittingalewdactonachild. z&!# (Pen.Code,261,_subdiv_.(a)(2);286,_subdiv_.  (Z#$ (c)(2);664;288a,_subdiv_.(c)(2);288,_subdiv_. )$% (c)(1).)Petitioneradmittedbotha"strike" *+z&& priorandaprisonprior. , ('  X X?(` ` ` hp x X ? XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X BHewassentencedtoatotaldeterminatetermof45 @ years,fourmonths,asfollows:    ` AstoCounts3and4,Petitionerwassentenced `  totwoconsecutiveuppertermsof8years,both  @ doubledto16years,pursuanttosections1170.12   and667,subdivisions(b)(_i_),foratotalof32 `  years.AstoCount5,thecourtsentenced   Petitionertoaconsecutivemidtermof3years, 0  doubledto6years,pursuanttosections1170.12   and667,subdivisions(b)(_i_)._inally_,asto P  Count6,thecourtsentencedPetitionertoone 0  thirdofthemidterm,or8months,doubledto16 p  months,pursuanttosections1170.12and667, P  subdivisions(b)(_i_).Thecourtorderedthatthis  term,too,beservedconsecutively.  p  XPetitionerwasfurthersentencedtoa  consecutive5yearterm,pursuanttosection667, @ subdivision(a)(1)forthepriorseriousfelony   conviction,andaconsecutive1yearterm, `" pursuanttosection667.5,subdivision(b),for #@ thepriorprisonterm. %   X ` Petitionertimelyappealed.Onorabout '`" November30,2006,theSecondDistrictCourtof (# Appeal,DivisionOne,issuedanunpublished 0*% opinioninwhichitaffirmedthejudgmentinall +' respects.(Acopyofthecourt'sopinionis P-( appendedtothispetitionasExhibit"A"  [hereafterOpinionatp.___.) @  ` ThisPetitionfollows.     ?( ` hp x X ? ISSUESPRESENTED   @   B( ` hp x ` X BThiscasepresentstherelatedissuesofwhether   thetrialcourterredbyimposingtheupperterms `  astoCounts3and4,aggravatingPetitioner's   sentenceastoCounts3and4pursuanttosection 0  667.6,andimposingconsecutivetermsastoall   counts,baseduponjudicialfactfindingas P  opposedtofactssubmittedtoandfoundtruebya 0  jury.TheCourtofAppealrejectedPetitioner's p  argumentsbaseduponPeoplev.Black(2005)35 P  Cal.4th1238.(Opinion,atpp.34.)Inrelation  tothisissue,PetitionerurgesthisCourttonow  p grantreviewtoreconsideritsdecisioninBlack.  Petitioneralsomakesthisargumentinaneffort @ topreserveitforsubsequentfederalreviewin   lightofthependingcaseofXZXPeoplev.Cunningham `" (Apr.18,2005,A103501)cert.grantedsub.nom. #@ Cunninghamv.California(2006)___U.S.___.xXXZ %  xԀ '`"   ?( ` hp x X ? STATEMENTOFFACTS (#  X  B( ` hp x ` X B Thefactsaregenerallysetforthinthe 0*%  Opinion,atpp.23.Additionalfactsnecessary +' forconsiderationofthecasearesetforthwithin  theargumentbelow. @  X      I.  REVIEWSHOULDBEGRANTEDTORESOLVE 5 THEISSUEOFWHETHERPETITIONERWAS *z UNCONSTITUTIONALLYSENTENCEDTOAGGRAVATED  o TERMSASTOCOUNTS3AND4.  d   A. ` INTRODUCTION.  N  ` WhentheprosecutionfiledtheInformationin  C thiscase,listedthereinwereseveralallegations   of"aggravatingfactors"pursuanttothe c  CaliforniaRulesofCourt,Rules4.421and4.425.   Duringoneoftheinitialpretrialhearings,the 3  prosecutorindicatedthesewereallegedpursuant   totherequirementof"_Blakely_Ԁthatifweproceed S totrialandIhavetoprovecircumstancesin 3 aggravation,IintendtoarguethatIwantthe s hightermsofthesentence."JudgeO'Neill S responded,"TheBlackdecisionseemstosuggest  thatyoudon'tneedtodothat."Theprosecutor #s indicatedshewasnotsureofthat,sosheputthe  allegationsintheInformation"inanabundanceof C! caution."Thecourtreplied,"Youcandothat, "# butwhetherornotthatgetsaddressedtothejury c$ withthechargesandthelike,ifitwenttome,I %C! wouldjustinformthemthereareotherissues." '"  ` Ultimately,thecasewas,infact,assignedto )c$ JudgeO'Neillfortrial.Whenthecasewas *% submittedtothejuryfordeliberations,the 3,' aforementionedallegationsofaggravating  circumstanceswerenotmentionedinanyofthe @ juryinstructions.    XAtthesentencinghearinginthiscase,the `  courtsentencedPetitionerasfollows:  @  X?(` ` ` hp x X ?   OnCounts3and4,thecourtwill u  sentencepursuanttoPenalCode,Section j  667.6(c)becauseIfindthatthevictimwas _  particularlyvulnerable. T   X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B `  X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?Shewasdevelopmentallydisabled,andher >  conditionwasreadilyapparenttoanyone, 3  especiallyMr._Mvuemba_,andthecrimes (x  involvedahighdegreeofcallousness. m  b OnCount3,aviolationof261(a)(2)of W thePenalCode,forciblerape,you'llbesent L tostateprison.Thehightermforthat A chargeiseightyears. 6  X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?Iwillimposethehightermfindingin   aggravationthatthereisevidenceofplanning  bytakingthevictimtoamoreremote,   secludedlocationtoaccomplishthissexual  assault.   X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?Idon'tfindanyfactorsinmitigation. ! Thehightermofeightyearswillbedoubled " pursuantto1170.12(a)through(d)and667(b) x# through(_i_)forthepriortermsinprisonyou m$ admittedforatotaltermof16years. b%   X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?Thatistobeservedconsecutivetoall L'"! charges.OnCount4,forciblesodomyin A(#" violationof286(c)(2),Iwillimposethe 6)$# uppertermofeightyearsfindingin +*{%$ aggravationatthetimeofthisparticular  +p&% offenseyouwereonparole. ,e'&  X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B  -Z('  X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?I'mfindingnofactorsinmitigation.  Thataswellwillbedoubledpursuantto  1170.12(a)through(d)and667(b)through(_i_),  andthatwillbeservedconsecutivelytoall  othercounts.   X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?OnCounts5and6,Iwillsentence n  pursuanttoPenalCodesection1170.1(a).On c  Count5,attemptedforcibleoralcopulationin X  violationof664and288(a)(c)(2),Iwill M   imposethemidterm.Themidtermisthree B  years.Thatwillbedoubledpursuantto 7  1170.12(a)through(d)and667(b)through(_i_) ,|  foratotaltermofsixyears. !q   X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?Thiswillbeorderedtobeserved  [ consecutivelytoallcountsbecauseitwasa P separateactofviolencetowardsthevictim E andinordertoaccomplishthisact,you : suppliedthevictimwithalcoholandmarijuana / toaccomplishyourgoals. $  X XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B X X?(` ` ` hp x X ?OnCount6,aviolationof288(c)(1),I  willimposeonethirdthemidterm.Thatis  eightmonths.Thatwillbedoubledpursuant  to1170.12(a)through(d)and667(b)through  (_i_)foratotaltermofoneyearandfour  monthstobeservedconsecutivelytoallother  countsbecause,again,thisisaseparateact | ofviolenceagainstthevictim. q   X X  B( ` hp x ` ` ` X B ..... "F  X X  ?(` ` ` hp x X ?Inadditionandconsecutivetoallthese &f!! terms,you'llreceivefiveyearsforthe  '["" 667(a)(1)priorwhichyouadmitted,andyou'll (P## receiveoneyearforthe667.5(b)(1)priorfor (E$$ whichyouadmittedforatotaltermof45 ):%%  yearsandfourmonthsinprison. */&&  XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X BdThetrialcourt'simpositionofanaggravated   sentenceastoCounts3and4,baseduponitsown @ judicial_factfinding_,violatedPetitioner's   constitutionalrightstodueprocessandajury `  trialunderthe5th,6thand14thAmendmentsto  @ theUnitedStatesConstitution,andparallel   Californiaconstitutionalprovisions.(_Apprendi_ `  v.NewJersey,supra,530U.S.at490;accord,   UnitedStatesv.Booker(2005d)543U.S.220,___ 0  [125_S.Ct_.738]d;_Blakely_Ԁv.Washington(2004)542   U.S.296.)d P   X  X?(` ` ` hp x X ?B. ` TheImpositionoftheUpperTermsastoCounts %  3and4ViolatedPetitionersSixthAmendment   RighttoATrialByJuryandhisFourteenth  AmendmentRighttoDueProcessofLaw.    XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B  ` In_Blakely_,theUnitedStatesSupremeCourt  madeitabundantlyclear,onceandforall,that 9 courtsmaynotmakeupwarddeparturesin  sentencingfromstatutorilyenumeratedmidterms Y forcriminaloffensesbaseduponfactsthatare  9 notbothallegedinanInformation,andfoundtrue y" byajurybeyondareasonabledoubt.This  $Y propositionstemsfromtheruleexpressedin %  _Apprendi_Ԁv.NewJersey(2000)530U.S.466,490: )'y" "[_o]ther_Ԁthanthefactofapriorconviction,any ( $  factthatincreasesthepenaltyforacrimebeyond I*% theprescribedstatutorymaximummustbesubmitted  toajury,andprovedbeyondareasonabledoubt." @   l<`  ` dPetitioneracknowledgesthat,inPeoplev.   Black(2005)35Cal.4th1238,theCalifornia `  SupremeCourtrecentlyupheldCalifornia's  @ sentencingschemeafternumerouschallengeswere   broughtunder_Blakely_.dWhileBlackiscontrolling `  atthistimewithintheCaliforniacourts,there   iscurrentlynoopinionfromtheUnitedStates 0  SupremeCourt  _   1     _7V x  ݀onwhetherBlackcanbereconciled   withthe_Blakely_opinion.Petitionerrespectfully P  submitsitcannot,andasksthisCourttofollow 0  theplainlanguageof_Blakely_,dconsistentwith p  Justice_Kennard_'sdissentingopinion,aswellasa P  recentcasepublishedinNewJersey,bythename  ofStatev._Natale_(N.J.2005)d184N.J.458,482  p [878A.2d724].)d h   x  XY  xIn_Natale_,theNewJerseySupremeCourt @ evaluateditsownsentencingscheme,whichis   similartothatofCaliforniainsofarasit `" providesforpresumptivetermsofimprisonment, #@ whileallowingforupwarddeparturesbasedupon %  additionaljudicial_factfinding_.TheCourtnoted '`" that"[_c]ourts_Ԁinstateswithsentencingschemes  similartoourownhavereachedvarying @ conclusionsregardingtheimpactof_Blakely_,   supra,andBooker,supra,onpresumptive `  sentencing."(Statev._Natale_,supra,d184N.J.  @ 458,482[878A.2d724].d)YY݌   Ќ  x  L^  xSpecificallywithregardtoBlack,theNew `  JerseySupremeCourtstated:"Werejectthe   Californiaapproachbecauseitappearstobein 0  directconflictwith_Blakely_Ԁ...."(Id.   (citing_Blakely_Ԁv.Washington,supra,542U.S.at P  Ѐ,n.8;124_S.Ct_.at2538,n.8("Whetherthe 0  judiciallydeterminedfacts require asentence p  enhancementormerely allow it,theverdictalone P  doesnotauthorizethesentence."))L^^݌  Ќ  x  Xa  x ` dAnotherstatewitharecentopinioninthe  p area,Maine,isalsoinlinewithNewJerseyand  thuscontrarytoCalifornia.(Statev._Schofield_ @ (Me.2005)876A.2d43,4851.)dThus,atleast   twoothercourtsinthenationhaverecognizedthe `" reasoningsetforthinBlackwasinerror.a4b݌ #@ Ќ    E.` hp x X E󀀀 ` dThesentencingschemeenactedbythe %  CaliforniaLegislatureisclear: Whenajudgment '`" ofimprisonmentistobeimposedandthestatute (# specifiesthreepossibleterms,thecourt shall  0*% orderimpositionofthemiddleterm, unless there +' arecircumstancesinaggravationormitigationof P-( thecrime.(Pen.Code,1170,_subd_.(b)  (emphasisadded).)EventheBlackCourthadto @ concede [_t]he_Ԁmandatorylanguageofsection1170,   subdivision(b)doesprovidesomesupportfor `  defendantsposition.(Peoplev.Black,35  @ Cal.4that1254.)    ` ConsequentlyinCalifornia,atrialjudge must  `  imposenomorethanthemidterm,unless   circumstancesinaggravationwarrantanupward 0  departurefromthemidterm.Inotherwords,the   presumptivemaximumtermofimprisonmentthatmay P  beimposedbasedsolelyonajury'sguiltyverdict 0  isthemiddleterm.Ajudgemaynotimposean p  uppertermunlesshemakesspecificfindingsof P  theexistenceofadditionalaggravatingfactors.  Thus,allbyitself,withnocircumstancesin  p aggravation,abareconvictionfortheoffense  aloneinCaliforniapermitsnomorethanamidterm @ determinatesentence.ThecourtinBlackagreed:    [_I]n_Ԁacaseinwhichno...aggravatingfactor `" canbefound,thejudgecannotimposetheupper #@ term.(Id.at1260(emphasisadded).) %   ` Doesthisinvoketheprinciplesof_Apprendi_? '`" Absolutely.And_Blakely_providessupportforthis (# proposition: [_T]he_Ԁstatutorymaximumfor 0*% _Apprendi_purposesisthemaximumsentenceajudge +' mayimposesolelyonthebasisofthefacts P-( reflectedinthejuryverdictoradmittedbythe  defendant.(_Blakely_Ԁv.Washington,542U.S.at @ 303[italicsinoriginal].)InCalifornia,as   discussedabove, themaximumsentenceajudgemay `  imposesolelyonthebasisofthefactsreflected  @ inthejuryverdictoradmittedbythedefendant   (Id.(italicsinoriginal))isthemidterm. `   ` Thediscussionshouldbeginandendthere:   Thepresumptivemidtermistheonlysentencethat 0  conformsto_Blakely_,absentachargeandjury   findingofwhateverfactsasentencingjudge P  wishestousetoimposeasentencegreaterthan 0  themidterm.ThereasoninginBlackissimply p  erroneous.The mandatorynatureofsection P  1170,subdivision(b)invokes_Apprendi_.(See,  Booker,supra,543U.S.at򀀀[125_S.Ct_.atp.  p 750].)   ` Asaresult,Petitionerasksthatthiscasebe @ remandedfor_resentencing_,withdirectionsthat   thebasetermsastoCounts3and4bereducedto `" therespectivemidtermsforthoseoffenses. #@     B( ` hp x X B  %  II.  REVIEWSHOULDBEGRANTEDTORESOLVETHEISSUE 5 OFWHETHERPETITIONER'SRIGHTSTODUEPROCESSAND *z AJURYTRIALWEREVIOLATEDWHENTHETRIALCOURT  o AGGRAVATEDHISSENTENCEPURSUANTTOSECTION667.6  d AFTERMAKINGSPECIFICFACTUALFINDINGS,NONEOF  Y WHICHWERESUBMITTEDTO,ORFOUNDTRUEBY,  N THEJURY.  C   A. ` INTRODUCTION.   8   ` Petitionerincorporatesherebyreferencethe x  factualdiscussioncontainedinpartI.A.,above. X  Hecontendsitwaserrorforthecourttosentence   himpursuanttosection667.6tofull,separate (x  andconsecutivetermsastoCounts3and4,under  theauthorityof_Apprendi_Ԁv.NewJersey(2000)530 H U.S.466,anditsprogeny. (   X?(` ` ` hp x X ?  h B. ` UtilizationofSection667.6toEffectUpward ] SentencingDeparturesfromtheStatutory R MaximumSentenceSetforthUnderSection G 1170.1,WithoutRequisiteJuryFindingsof < Fact,ViolatesaCriminalDefendant'sSixth 1 AmendmentRighttoaJuryTrial. & v   XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B ` Section1170.1provideswhereacriminal !k defendantisconvictediftwoormorefelonies, " andconsecutivetermsareimposed,thesentence ;$ shallgenerallyconsistofaprincipalterm,one %! ormoresubordinatetermsandanyapplicable ['" enhancementterms.Thesectionfurtherprovides (;$  thatallsubordinatetermsaretobecalculatedas {*% onethirdofthemiddletermfortheunderlying  offense.(Pen.Code,1170.1,_subd_.(a).) @   ` Section667.6,ontheotherhand,providesfor   theimpositionoffull,separateandconsecutive `  termsforeachsubordinatetermforcertain  @ enumeratedsexoffenses,"inlieuoftheterm   providedinsection1170.1."(Pen.Code, `  667.6,_subdivs_.(c)and(d).)Undersubdivision   (d),theimpositionoffull,separateand 0  consecutivesentencesismandatedwherethecrimes   involveseparatevictimsorthesamevictimon P  "separateoccasions."(Pen.Code,667.6,_subd_. 0  (d).)Impositionoffull,separateand p  consecutivesentencesundersubdivision(c)rests P  withinthecourt'sdiscretion,butthecourtis  requiredtofirstmakespecificfactualfindings  p justifyingadeparturefromthesentencingscheme  proscribedbysection1170.1.(Peoplev. @ _Belmontes_(1983)34Cal.3d335,347348.)In   eithercase,theaggravatedsentencedependsupon `" ajudge'sfactualfindings,noneofthe #@ allegationsofwhicharesubmittedtoajury. %   ` Petitionerincorporatesbyreferenceherehis '`" discussionaboveof_Blakely_Ԁv.Washington,dsupra, (# 542U.S.296d,andtherelatedauthoritiescited. 0*% Thefull,separateandconsecutivetermsimposed +' astoCounts3and4areunconstitutionalforthe P-( _samereasonstheimpositionofuppertermsasto  thesesametwocountswasunconstitutional,as @ detailedabove.Undertherationaleof_Apprendi_   and_Blakely_,impositionofanaggravatedsentence `  under667.6violatedPetitioner'sSixthAmendment  @ righttohaveajurydetermineeveryfact   essentialtohissentence. `   ` Consequently,Petitionerrespectfullyrequests   thathiscaseberemandedtothetrialcourtwith 0  directionsthatthetermsimposedpursuantto   section667.6bestricken,andthathebe P  sentencedpursuanttosection1170.1. 0    p    III.  REVIEWSHOULDBEGRANTEDTORESOLVETHEISSUE 5 OFWHETHERPETITIONERWASUNCONSTITUTIONALLY *z SENTENCEDTOCONSECUTIVETERMSOFIMPRISONMENT  o ASTOCOUNTS3,4,5and6  d   A. ` FactualBackground.   Y  ` Petitionerwassentencedundersection669to   consecutivetermsastoallCounts.Thecourt )y  utilizedtheaggravatingfactorssetforthabove,   inpartI.A.,toimposethisconsecutivesentence, I  asopposedtoaconcurrentterm.Thistoo,was )  unconstitutional,under_Apprendi_Ԁand_Blakely_. i    X?(` ` ` hp x X ?  I  B. ` California'sSentencingLaws,WhichAllowfor  theImpositionofaConsecutive,Ratherthana  ConcurrentTermforCriminalOffenses,Upona  Judge'sFactualFindingsWhichAreNot  ReflectedintheJury'sVerdict,Are  Unconstitutional. y    XB( ` hp x ` ` ` X B ` PenalCodesection669providesthatinthe n  absenceofspecialfindingsbythetrialjudge,  N sentencesfortwoormorefeloniesshallrun   concurrently.(Pen.Code,669.)Therule n  implementingthatstatuteisCaliforniaRulesof   Court,rule4.425. >   ` Basedontheserules,inordertosentence   consecutivelyratherthanconcurrently,thetrial ^  judgehastofindoneormoreofthefactors > listedinrule4.425.Noneofthesefactorsare ~ presentedtoorfoundtruebeyondareasonable ^ doubtbyaunanimousjury.Consecutivesentencing  isanenhancedsentencingpowerreservedsolely .~ forthetrialjudgebasedonfactorsbeyondthose  authorizedbythejuryverdictalone.Assuch, N  theconsecutivesentencingschemeinCalifornia !. failsthe_Apprendi_testasexplainedin_Blakely_ n# andthusviolatestheSixthAmendmentrighttoa $N  jurytrial.Forthesereasons,Petitioner's &! consecutivesentencesimposedpursuanttosection (n# 669andRule4.425oftheCaliforniaRuleofCourt )$ areunconstitutional.  >+&   IV.  CONCLUSION @    ` Forallthesereasons,Petitioner_LANDU_   _MVUEMBA_ԀrespectfullyrequeststhisCourtnowgrant `  reviewastotheaforementionedimportantissues  @ oflaw.   DATED:    h     Respectfullysubmitted,    `     h     By: p      x  F  0   `     h     Stephen_Temko_,Esq. %   `     h     AttorneyforPetitioner    `     h     _LANDU_Ԁ_MVUEMBA_    9    RULE33(B)(1)CERTIFICATION     ` PursuanttotheCaliforniaRulesofCourt,  Rule33,subdivision(b)(1),Iherebycertifythat  theforegoingbriefcontains2,992words,  exclusiveoftables,indices,coversandproofof y  service. n  DATED:    h      p      x  F  X   `     h     Stephen_Temko_ M       X 7   XXZX