WPC3 dp,c]Zyg-&omwc֯KFE)a^l2NH2HU7q zN2:|0L\=^g$^f.c4 ~b^5d [bD5TܰtSA6UX+y19&{O CNx &_$^ Na3zNGEkd`-S9BQ<['`k!ms[EXT^M,xBMօen8qwW'Dx%n Q0QbW`վ/"md0S[6ו,ұ4N-W2 ܻP)}ԾzI]3AA$x* ]RUL>R݁qXewc$3o#UD % 0g% ^ w 4   m   0')   0$ 0D   N  " 6 N   -----y $@   ^zzzzzzz ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) BCCCCCC `xx 9M $HP LaserJet 1200 Series PCL 60< 9Z+,Courier10 BT RomanX(?߷$HXXXXfkH6 a 5yFiles3|xU'Smylie1( $ 1([(3$ ߷!HXXXXf      0  (#$  0   2Sixth2 ߷!XXXXf  __AaUnited_ԀStatesConstitution,SixthAmendmentFourteenth  $XXXXf    1    _ԀThehighcourtsofseveralotherstateshavingsentencing  schemessimilartoWashingtonsandCaliforniashaveheld, p contrarytoBlack,that_Blakely_doesapplytotheirstatutory 0 sentencingschemes.(See  Statev._Natale_(N.J.2005)184N.J. @ 458,482[878A.2d724];  Statev._Smylie_(Ind.2005)823N.E.2d  679,683; ( Statev.Brown(2005)209Ariz.200[99P.3d15,17 p 18]; * State_v._Ԁ_Shattuck_(Minn.2005)704N.W.2d131,141142; 0   - State_v._Ԁ_Dilts_(2004)337Ore.645,652[103P.2d95]; / State_v._  @ _Schofield_(Me.2005)876A.2d43,4851.)!Natale1 R!XXXX  _Statev._Natale_(N.J.2005)184N.J.458 ߷!XXXXf  __OPenal_ԀCode,section288 R!XXXX  _Statev._Smylie_(2005)823N.E.2d679)BrownAriz1 R!XXXX  _Statev.Brown(2005)209Ariz.200+Shattuck1 R!XXXX  _Statev._Shattuck_(2005)704N.W.2d131.Dilts1 R!XXXX  _Statev._Dilts_(2004)337Ore.6450Schofield1 R!XXXX  _Statev._Schofield_(Me.2005)876A.2d43&Pen. 2882 diBlakely1 ߷!XXXXf  __Blakely_v.Washington(2004)542U.S.296lBlack1 ߷!XXXXf  _Peoplev.Black(2005)35Cal.4th1238nCunningham1  ߷!XXXXf  _Cunninghamv.California(caseno.056551)    򀀀U.S.򀀀[126S.Ct.1329;164_L.Ed_.2d47] ߷!HXXXXf  _HTRX3'X3' Letter3'Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta3'LetterTNumberS򀀀  (CourtofAppealNo.C050785) p @ SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA 0  PEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF) p     CALIFORNIA,) 0   Ѐ)  @    Plaintiff/Respondent,)   Ѐ) p  Ѐ) 0  v.) @  Ѐ)   Ѐ) p  WESLEYDAVIDFRENCH, h ) 0  Ѐ) @   Defendant/Appellant.)  򀀀) p @AppealfromtheSuperiorCourtofSacramentoCounty, p @hh#Number02f07203 0 @l l Hon._Maryanne_ԀG._Gilliard_,Judge  @| | 򀀀 0  @ APPELLANT'SPETITIONFORREVIEW   @ppAFTERUNPUBLISHEDOPINIONOFTHECOURTOFAPPEAL, }! @ THIRDAPPELLATEDISTRICT, J" @| | AFFIRMINGTHEJUDGMENTOFCONVICTION  g# @@ @ 򀀀 4$ 3(#GREGORYMARSHALL(77306) #) 3(#P.O.Box996 d$* 3(#Palo_Cedro_,CA96073 $%t + 3(#(530)5494836 %4!, 3(#AttorneyforPetitioner* d'". 8  *ByappointmentoftheCourtofAppealunderthe+4'4   Ѐ_C.C.A.P._Ԁindependentcasesystem  ,'5 _@" TABLEOFCONTENTS    TABLEOFCONTENTS ""J(#. i M  TABLEOFAUTHORITIES 8"8"I(#.ii J   INTRODUCTION ""J(#.P P 1     STATEMENTOFTHEISSUEPRESENTEDFORREVIEW ""J(#.52  4   RULE28.1CERTIFICATIONS ""J(#."2 1   STATEMENTOFTHECASE ""J(#.2 ~   STATEMENTOFFACTS ""J(#. 4   DISCUSSION ""J(#.` ` 5 h   THESUPREMECOURTSHOULDRECONSIDERWHETHER e   IMPOSITIONOFTHEUPPERTERMVIOLATED 2   PETITIONERSCONSTITUTIONALRIGHTSUNDER O   BLAKELYv.WASHINGTON ""J(#.$5   CONCLUSION ""J(#.` ` 6 i!  (AttachmentA)  f $ @88)i s,'4 @<<  TABLEOFAUTHORITIES  3-(5  CASES  /*8 Ї              Blakelyv.Washington(2004)542U.S.296""J(#.35  ݈ p Ќ̌        |  Cunninghamv.California(caseno.056551) E   򀀀U.S.򀀀[126S.Ct.1329;164L.Ed.2d47]""J(#.=5  |݈  Ќ̌          Peoplev.Black(2005)35Cal.4th1238""J(#.05  ݈ 5  Ќ̌        a  Statev.Brown(2005)209Ariz.200""J(#.-5  a|݈   Ќ̌          Statev.Dilts(2004)337Ore.645""J(#.,5  ;݈ 5   Ќ̌          Statev.Natale(N.J.2005)184N.J.458""J(#.pp25  ݈   Ќ̌          Statev.Schofield(Me.2005)876A.2d43""J(#.35  ݈ ?  Ќ̌          Statev.Shattuck(2005)704N.W.2d131""J(#.15  ݈   Ќ̌        H  Statev.Smylie(2005)823N.E.2d679""J(#./5  Hc݈ I  Ќ̌   CONSTITUTIONALPROVISIONS / STATUTES              UnitedStatesConstitution,SixthAmendment""J(#.55  ݈ + Ќ̌        B  UnitedStatesConstitution,FourteenthAmendment""J(#.00:5  B]݈ [ Ќ̌            PenalCode,section288""J(#.xx!2  9݈ +  Ќ̌  {/// [" @(ii  (k#/ 8XXdd8NumberS_______  (CourtofAppealNo.C050785) p @ SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA 0  PEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF)     CALIFORNIA,) p   Ѐ) 0     Plaintiff/Respondent,)  @  Ѐ)   v.) p  Ѐ) 0  WESLEYDAVIDFRENCH, h ) @  Ѐ)     Defendant/Appellant.) p  򀀀) 0  @| | 򀀀 0  @ APPELLANT'SPETITIONFORREVIEW  @ppAFTERUNPUBLISHEDOPINIONOFTHECOURTOFAPPEAL, } @ THIRDAPPELLATEDISTRICT, J @| | AFFIRMINGTHEJUDGMENTOFCONVICTION  g @@ @ 򀀀 4 ff  TOTHEHONORABLERONALDM.GEORGE,CHIEFJUSTICE,ANDTOTHE 4  HONORABLEASSOCIATEJUSTICESOFTHESUPREMECOURTOFCALIFORNIA: z"   WesleyDavidFrenchpetitionsthiscourtforreviewofthe  `$ decisionoftheCourtofAppeal,ThirdAppellateDistrict,filed !& October30,2006,whichaffirmedtheSuperiorCourt'sjudgment. <#( AcopyoftheunpublishedopinionisattachedasAttachmentAto $" * thispetition. h&!, ///  'N#. f@  STATEMENTOFTHEISSUEPRESENTEDFORREVIEW     THESUPREMECOURTSHOULDRECONSIDERWHETHER @   IMPOSITIONOFTHEUPPERTERMVIOLATED $t   PETITIONERSCONSTITUTIONALRIGHTSUNDER  X   BLAKELYv.WASHINGTON   < @hh#򀀀 R   @LL RULE28.1CERTIFICATIONS      Theundersignedcounselherebycertifiesasfollows, : pursuanttorule28.1oftheCaliforniaRulesofCourt: 6   Apetitionforrehearingwasnotfiledinthiscase.    Thewordcountofthispetitionforreviewis:1,147.# > @hh#򀀀  @  STATEMENTOFTHECASE  > f  Acomplaint,deemedaninformationandfiledassuchon ~!" October16,2002,allegedagainstpetitioner12countsoflewd #d$ andlasciviousconductwithminorsundertheageof14( 7 Pen. $& Code,288,subd.(a)),ondatesonandbetweenAugustof2000 @&!( andSeptemberof2001.Counts1through5involvedthevictim '&#*  BrandonB.,counts6through10involvedthevictim Brittany l)$, P.,andcounts11and12involvedthevictim ZacharyL.(C.T. +R&. 2937.) ,'0   ThecasewasassignedtoadepartmentfortrialonJune1, ..~)2 2004.OnJune8,beforejuryselectionbegan,theparties  arrivedatanegotiateddisposition,accordingtowhich F petitionerplednocontesttocounts1,2,9,10,11,and12, , withan18year lidontheprisonsentence.Petitioner r  proceededtopleadnocontestpursuanttotheagreement.(C.T.  X 17,18,135;R.T.2536.)      OnJuly9petitionermadeanoralrequestforacontinuance 4  forthepurposeofmakingamotiontowithdrawtheplea.The   courtdidnotgrantthemotion.(C.T.157;R.T.3950,passim.) `  Thecourtproceededtopronouncejudgmentandsentencepetitioner F to18yearsinprison,atermwhichconsistedofanupper,eight  yeartermoncountone,andconsecutivesentencesofonethird "r thesixyearmiddletermi.e.,twoyears,eachonthefive  othercounts.Thecourtgrantedcreditfortimeservedof784 N days.(C.T.157159,189190;R.T.5052.) 4   TheCourtofAppeal,ThirdAppellateDistrict,affirmedthe z conviction.(AttachmentA.) `  /// " ///