WPC ~!D4)]ş9T{V5A%htD4))T5m?u .\$Cm5N~J)Vݔ(kz$ ?sNtK_{jq*M]Mw]j#3SԘ)RbĘ7Jh_r|Q@նvUNn B|ifե+usND8+ X! 8m0]9đwѸ#)"'naH؝Ժe~hS&zfv Q)e(j"j"l9ԃqV8He @Vs^8#UN %' 0-U :HN^  1u 72w74;O^ m`U>w 0U 0  0} 0d 0# 0 0 0< 0 0 0 0 0! 0V" 0" 0# 09$ 0$ 0]% 0% 0& 0h' 0( 0( 0T) 0) 0~* 0 + 0+ 0@, 0, 0>- 0- 0. 0/ 00 01 02 0x3 0Z4 0p5 0*6 0*7 0*8 0.9 0,: 0'; 0=< 0S= 02%> 0W> 0m? 0i@ 0WA 0WB 0:]C 0C 0YD 0_D 0LE 0JF 0 HG 0RH 0I 0K 0L B*M 0~M D/}O D+O 0O BP 0P D/R 0S 06S 0T 0:U 0^WU 0<U 0hUU6YWU>WU*WWW 0NW 0EX 1EY 72Y 0cY 1aZ 720[ 0cb[b[[ 0` 0tadMblbAc DO^j^j^j^j^j^j^j^j^j^j^j^j 0j 0Bk 0Bkkk 0P+m+m+m+m{nrr 0At 0Tt 0huu;u 0$u 0<#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w#w 0'_x 0$y 0!z 0{ 0| 0~ 0 01111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0+ 1c------------ B- 0CHP LaserJet 1200 Series PCL 60(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(#G$  , + + + USUS.,n8ēdd 8,@E Z"Book Antiqua g/3 3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)3p}.bk33|x U\  `&Times New Roman*+ (_2623  ..*D+D (_25   ," <DL,23  ..," <DL,   (-(2*$ #G!  , X9XXX!XX9USUS.,n8dXXd8     `   0  *5+5 (_24  ) <DL)23  ..) <DL)  *2+2 (_23 ` &<<DL&23  ..&<<DL& ` */+/ (_22  #DL#23  ..#DL#  *,+, (_21   DL 23  .. DL  *)+) (_20 h DDL23  ..DDL h *&+& (_19  L23  ..L  *#+# (_18   L23  .. L  *>> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h *&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  (22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` (// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L  0AA.Normal  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition T  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(hh&H1  5+ ` hp x 5      5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H2  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H3  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  *jj(c18     /% ` hp x/XXX    /% ` hp x/  (]]&H4  5+ ` hp x 5 XXX 5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H5  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H6  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  *vv(p22      /%  hp x/XXX    /%  hp x/   2DD0Address  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  *kk(p24    /%  hp x/XXX  /%  hp x/   *kk(p25    /%  hp x/XXX  /%  hp x/   *mm(p26     2( ` hp x2XXX    2( ` hp x2  *jj(c27     /% ` hp x/XXX    /% ` hp x/  *gj(p28     ," o hp x,XXX    /% ` hp x/  *vv(p29      /% hp x/XXX    /% ` hp x/   *vv(p30      /%  hp x/XXX    /%  hp x/   8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE*vv(p33      /%  hp x/XXX    /%  hp x/   ,dl*CODEKa<6X9`(Courier NewKSb\  `&Times New RomanS*bb(p35   2( ` hp x2XXX  2( ` hp x2  *kk(p36    /%  hp x/XXX  /%  hp x/   *nn(p37    2( ` hp x2XXX  2( ` hp x2   42Emphasis*hk(p39   g ,"o o hp x,XXX  /% ` hp x/   64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    *jj(c42     /% ` hp x/XXX    /% ` hp x/  *jj(p43      /%  hp x/XXX    /% ` hp x/  4go2Keyboard Ka<6X9`(Courier NewKSb\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted  /%  ,Kk %#/Ka<6X9`(Courier NewKSb\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/  <:zBottom of 7T(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?c%2A`Arial?  Sb\  `&Times New RomanS7U(X75+ ` hp x 5  *kk(p47   $ /%, ,E hp x/XXX  /% ` hp x/   *gj(p48  8   ,"@ @ whp x,XXX    /% ` hp x/  &  d d< $:HEADING 1 01!  cb  !  cb  R)1dxd'dxd*__(p53   /% ` hp x/XXX  /% ` hp x/   d<:zTop of For7Y(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?c%2A`Arial?  Sb\  `&Times New RomanS7U(X75+ ` hp x 5  R)2dxd0KS.SampleKa<6X9`(Courier NewKSb\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKa<6X9`(Courier NewKSb\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  8 ;|6TEXT (JDS)  cb  X  cb  X<6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial(O$*kk(p70    /%  hp x/XXX  /%  hp x/   8?OU[agmsyLettersLettersA.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.hA.(;3$2#  0  .3  0  S4O37;CO_s11.11.1.11.1.1.11.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1k1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1(;3$2#  0  .3  0  - -  *$ , X$XXX ]XX$USUS.,   `   1    _ MatthewL.Cate,InspectorGeneral,TheCaliforniaYouth  AuthorityHasNotCorrectedDeficienciesIdentifiedbyPastAuditsinIts    CoreMissionofProvidingRehabilitationServicestoWards,Press  Release,DatedJan.3,2005,p.2.(See  <4r fO  5  http://www.oig.ca.gov/press-rlse/PR01-03-05.pdf>6ifO}  7 :Ԁ(lastviewed " Jan.5,2004).)Thefullauditreportcanviewedat:  , <4s fO  5  http://www.oig.ca.gov/pdf/AccountabilityAudit-CYA.pdf6fO  7 >(last  6 viewedJan.5,2004).*__(t79   /% ` hp x/XXX  /% ` hp x/  *P_(p80    Bp x XXX  /% ` hp x/  <http://www.oig.ca.gov/press-rlse/PR01-03-05.pdf>http://www.oig.ca.gov/pdf/AccountabilityAudit-CYA.pdf 7 *$ , X$XXX ]XX$USUS.,   `   2    _ ThisCourtneednotdeterminenowwhatwillhappen  onremandifthereremainnoresidentialfacilitiesthatwillhave   appellant.Bythetimeappellantisreturnedtojuvenilecourt,afull  yearwilllikelyhavepassedsincehislastdispositionalhearing.And  thatyearwillbefullofnewinformationaboutappellantsneedsand ( whatrisksheposes.Despitethesuggestionsintherecordthatthere  2 werenoalternatives,itappearsthatsomeoptionswerenever  < explored,includingout-of-statefacilities.Alsoignoredwasthe  F Lanterman-Petris-ShortAct(LPSAct)(5000etseq.),which isa  P comprehensiveschemedesignedtoaddressavarietyof  Z  circumstancesinwhichamemberofthegeneralpopulationmay d  needtobeevaluatedortreatedfordifferentlengthsoftime.(Cooley n  v.SuperiorCourt(2002)29Cal.4th228,253.)Apersonwho, asa (x  resultofmentaldisorder,isadangertoothers,ortohimselfor 2  herself,orgravelydisabled,maybetakenintocustodyandplaced < inadesignatedfacilityforvaryingperiods,dependingonthe F circumstances.(5150.)Suchproceedingscanapplytowardsofthe P juvenilecourt.(6550;InrePatrickH.(1997)54Cal.App.4th1346.)WWG"Thin Top/Bottom! dxdx<__:footnote tex   /% ` hp x/  /% ` hp x/  <:footnote ref64Body Text     /% ` hp x/    /% ` hp x/  <:Body Text In  X  2( ` hp x2  2( ` hp x2 X   Kliszewskir]eopenedMcClymondslaundromatChetser EMTs a]npsychotropicZyrexaHaldolCogentinBenedryl B]utw]henMontalvog]ivent]heyC.Y.A.t]hereZyprexea i]fdecompensate w]e h]isTeofilioDomanicBassett Welf n]obenefited CateLantermanPetrisMcCutchenMcLarandAss'n J.W. CYA I]nRonnyOrabuenaA]ppellateBenevidesCal.RptrPresentenceAntwon  ; ' bonnie0bonnie .   (Vm$0   (,!$0  0` (#(#  (@$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# ` page page chapter volume footnote endnote <J:signaturepld  &8(0&XXX  &8(0&<V:2 Spacing Pl  2( p x(02XXX  2( p x(02<]+c :Outline009_2   ) hp x)23  ..  /% ` hp x/  <Z+c :Outline009_3 j  &hp x&23  ..  /% ` hp x/ j <W+c :Outline009_4  ` #hhp x#23  ..  /% ` hp x/  <T+c :Outline009_5    p x 23  ..  /% ` hp x/  <Q+c :Outline009_6 j  p x23  ..  /% ` hp x/ j <N+c :Outline009_7  h pp x23  ..  /% ` hp x/  <K+c :Outline009_8     x23  ..  /% ` hp x/  <<+W :Outline009_9 j    x23  ../% ` hp x/ j <WW :Outline037_1  /% ` hp x/23  /% ` hp x/  ) 359?EKQW]1.a.i.1.a.i.1.a.)Hairline d($     #G!  , X$XXX ]XX$USUS.,n8̓dd8  _ ,    ,3 A  & V ,   ARGUMENT om    I. @`   TheJuvenileCourtAbuseditsDiscretionWhenitCommitted  Appellant,ASeriouslyMentallyIllChild,ToTheYouth   Authority om!.     X X   , , Trytostayoutofthegangsbecausetheyhavealotof   gangsupthere.     , c X? X1Thosewerethepartingwords,notofaolderstreetsavvyrelative .  'Vormentorwatchingoutforachildmovingtoanewneighborhood, B  butofajuvenilecourtjudgecommittingaseverelymentallyillchild V totheCaliforniaYouthAuthority.(CT5.)ThatcommitmenttoCYA j mustbereversed,notjustbecausetherearegangsatCYA,but .~ becausealltheevidenceintherecordshowsthatCYAisunableto B providethementalhealthtreatmentappellantneeds.Therealsowas V noevidencepresentedonwhetherCYAcouldmeethiseducational j needs. ~    ,A. ` StandardOfReview om. "  , ThisCourtreviewsthejuvenilecourtsdecisiontocommita $ minortotheCYAforanabuseofdiscretion.(InreAngelaM.(2003) &!! 111Cal.App.4th1392,1396.) Theremustbeevidenceintherecord ($# demonstratingbothaprobablebenefittotheminorbyaCYA *"&% commitmentandtheinappropriatenessorineffectivenessofless ,6(' restrictivealternatives.(Id.[citingInrePedroM.(2000)81  Cal.App.4th550,555;InreTeofilioA.(1989)210Cal.App.3d571,  576-577.) ACYAcommitmentmaybeconsidered,however, ( withoutpreviousresorttolessrestrictiveplacements.(Id.)  < Substantialevidencemustsupporttheplacementorder.(See,In  P reDomanicB.(1994)23Cal.App.4th366,373-374,citingMichaelD., d  188Cal.App.3dat1397;TeofilioA.,210Cal.App.3dat579.) (x  Substantialevidenceis evidencethatinspiresconfidenceandisof < solidvalue.(Peoplev.Marshall(1997)15Cal.4th1,34[citingPeople P v.Morris(1988)46Cal.3d1,19andPeoplev.Bassett(1968)69Cal.2d d 122,139].)Consideringtheevidenceinthelightmostfavorableto x thejudgment,theCourtmustdeterminewhetherareasonablefact  finderwouldmadethefindingunderthegoverningstandardof  proof.(InreJamesB.(2003)109Cal.App.4th862,872.)  & .  ,   B.0 ` TheEvidenceofaProbableBenefitfromaCYA ! CommitmentWasInsufficient om. "` `   , Inassessingwhetherthecourtabuseditsdiscretion,thisCourt $  '.! mustexaminetheevidenceatthedispositionhearinginlightofthe &2"! purposesofJuvenileCourtLaw.(InreMichaelR.(1977)73 (F$# Cal.App.3d327,333.)Anabuseofdiscretionmaybefoundwhen  +Z&% thereisnosubstantialevidencetosupportthejuvenilecourts  findingsorwhenthejuvenilecourtsdecisionisunreasonablein  lightofthosefindings.(Id.;seealso,TeofilioA.,210Cal.App.3dat ( 579.)Inthiscase,appellantshistoryestablishesthatplacinghim  < withcriminallysophisticatedjuvenilesatCYAwillbedetrimentalto  P him;andthattherewasnoevidencebeforethecourtthatthere d  wouldbeanybenefittoappellantfromaCYAcommitment,orthat (x  hewouldreceivethementalhealthtreatmenthesodesperately < needs.Tothecontrary,theevidencesuggestedaCYAcommitment P wouldbetoappellantsdetriment. d Priorto1984,juvenilecommitmentproceedingswereaimedat x rehabilitationandtreatment,notpunishment.(TeofilioA.,210  Cal.App.3dat575-576;seealsoInreAlineD.(1975)14Cal.3d557,  567.)In1984,theLegislatureexpresslyrecognizedthatpunishment  andprotectionofthepublicwerealsoproperpurposesforthe ! juvenilecourttoconsider.(Welf.&Inst.Code202(a)and(b);Inre #, MichaelD.(1987)188Cal.App.3d1392,1396.)Nevertheless, %@!   treatmentandrehabilitationoftheminorremainparamount,and (T#" anypunishmentmustbe consistentwiththerehabilitative  objectivesofthe[juvenilecourtlaw].(Welf.&Inst.Code202(b).)     , ,Thus,whiletherehasbeenaslightshiftinemphasis, ( rehabilitationcontinuestobeanimportantobjectiveofthe  2 juvenilecourtlaw.TosupportaCYAcommitment,itis  < requiredthattherebeevidenceintherecorddemonstrating  F probablebenefittotheminor,andevidencesupportinga  P determinationthatlessrestrictivealternativesareineffective  Z  orinappropriate. d   ,t ,f R@ ,(TeofilioA.,210Cal.App.3dat576.).Adeterminationofsuitabilityfor (x  commitmenttotheCYAmustbeassessedinaccordancewithsection < 734,whichmandatesafindingofprobablebenefitfromtheCYA P commitment: d  ,  , ,[n]owardofthejuvenilecourtshallbecommittedtothe x YouthAuthorityunlessthejudgeofthecourtisfullysatisfied  thatthementalandphysicalconditionandqualificationsof  thewardaresuchastorenderitprobablethathewillbe  benefitedbythereformatoryeducationaldisciplineorother  treatmentprovidedbytheYouthAuthority.   ,X ,J 6$ ,Inthiscase,thereisinsufficientevidencethatappellantwilllikely   benefitfromaCYAcommitment.Notonlywastheevidence "" insubstantial,therewasaffirmativeevidencethatappellantwould $6  notbenefitfrom,andwouldbeharmedby,aCYAcommitment. &J"!  ,Appellanthadnohistoryofviolenceuntiltheonsetofhis )^$# psychoticbreak.Oncetreatedwithmedication,whilenotcured,his "+r&% conditionstabilizedandhewasnolongerviolentandhenolonger  exhibitedextremebehaviorliketheassaults,exhibitionism,urinating  onothersandplayingwithfeces.(CT152.)Mentalhealthtreatment ( wasimperativetohisrehabilitation.Butappellantsmedication  < doesntworkonitsown.Itneedstomonitoredandtweaked,i.e  P  gettingthesocalledcocktailcorrect.((RTMar.2,2004at3.)Andit d  needstobesupplementedwithfamilyvisits.(CT128.) (x  Theprobationofficerandthepsychologistagreedthatappellant < wouldnotreceivethetreatmentherequiredatCYAandthatCYA P commitmentwouldputhimtoofarfromhisfamily.(CT119,128.) d Notonlywastherealackofabenefit,buttherewasapotentialfor x graveharmtoappellantatCYAstemmingfromuntreatedmental  illness.  Noevidencetothecontrarywaspresentedatthehearingandthe  juvenilecourtgavenoexplanationastohowitsfindingofa ! probablebenefitcouldbereconciledwiththeunanimousopinion #, thatappellantwouldnotgetthementalhealthtreatmentheneeds. %@!  ((RTApr.5,2004,passim.)Thelackofanysubstancebehindthe (T#" probablebenefitfindingisreflectedbythecourtsoralrecitation, *h%$ withoutanyembellishment((RTApr.5,2004at45),ofthestatutory  language(Welf.&Inst.Code734),whichisalsofound,again  withoutembellishment,intheformminuteorderandthe ( commitmentorder.(CT150,154.)  < Theexpertspredictionsthatappellantwouldnotreceivethe  P mentalhealthtreatmentherequiredappearprophetic.OnJanuary3, d  2005,theCaliforniaInspectorGeneralissuedareportconcluding (x  thatatCYA Mentalhealthandcounselingservicesforwardsare... < lacking.Atonefacility, notasinglewardinasamplefromthe P generalpopulation...hadreceivedtheminimumamountofrequired d counseling.Andmanywardsdonotreceivethetreatmentneeds x assessmentinthefirst21days,asrequiredbydepartmentpolicy.o 7  1        Theprobationofficersuncontradictedreport,supportedbythe  psychologistsreport,isentitledtogreatweight.Aprobationofficer  must representtheinterestsofeachpersonwhohasbeen ! adjudgedawardofthecourtandto furnishthecourtsuch  informationandassistanceasthecourtmayrequire.(Welf.&Inst.  Code280.) Sincetheinceptionofthejuvenilecourtsystemthe ( probationofficerhasbornethedutytoadviseandcareforthe  < juveniledefendant.(InreMichaelC.(1978)21Cal.3d471,477  P [reversedonothergroundsinFarev.MichaelC.(1979)442U.S.707, d  725].)Theprobationofficer,uponlearningofappellantsgrave (x  mentalillnessandofappellantstreatmentneeds,changedhis < positionandrecommendedagainstCYA.Therewasnocontrary P evidenceofspecifictreatmentprogramsthatappellantwouldbe d eligibleforatCYA. x Dr.Montalvoalsoemphasizedtheneedforappellanttobeina  structurededucationalprogram.(CT128.)Thereisabsolutelyno  evidenceintherecordthatCYAwouldbeabletosatisfyappellants  specialeducationalneeds. ! TherewasatimewhencourtsassumedthatCYAhasprograms #, tobenefitwards.(Seee.g.InreTyroneO.(1989)209Cal.App.3d145, %@!  153.)Butthosedaysareover(andperhapsnosuchassumptions (T#" shouldeverhavebeenmade).FactualfindingsaboutCYA,likeall *h%$ factualfindings,shouldnolongerbebaseduponassumptionsor  reputation.CYA,likeallinstitutions,isnotstatic.Itsabilitytomeet  theneedsofminorsasaclassisfluid,changingfrommonthto ( month,greatlyaffectedbychangesinleadership,staff,client  < population,policy,andfunding,amongotherthings.AndCYA,like  P allinstitutions,isnoteveryone,evenwhenitoperatesoptimally. d  Therejustsomekidswhoseneedscannotbemetthere. (x  Itisasmallburdenontheprobationdepartmentsandlitigantsto < presentevidenceineachjuvenilecaseaboutthespecificneedsofthe P juvenileandabouthow,basedoncurrentgovernmentreports, d expertevidence,orfirsthandcurrentreportsfromCYAstaff,CYA x canservethoseneeds.Thiswasactuallydoneinthiscase"withthe  expertsfindingthatCYAwouldnotmeetappellantsneeds"butthe  juvenilecourtignoredthatclearevidence.  Mostlikely,thejuvenilecourtmadetheprobablebenefitfinding ! becausetheprobationdepartmentanddefensecounselhadnotyet #, foundanotherfacilitytotakeappellant.Thelackofalternatives %@!  certainlyisaconcern.ButCYAisnotthedefaultdumpingground (T#" forchildrenandthelackofalternativesdoesnotrelievethecourt_of *h%$ itsdutytofindaprobablebenefit.t 7  2      ׀Theremaybecases"thosewith  difficult-to-placejuveniles"wherethecreativenessand  aggressivenessoftheprobationdepartmentandthejudgewillbe ( tested,butifCYAcannotprovideamentallyillminorwiththe  < treatmentheneeds,hemustremaininthecounty(juvenilehallor  P elsewhere)untilabeneficialplacementisfound. d  BecausetherewasnoevidenceofaprobablebenefitfromaCYA (x  commitment,thejuvenilecourterredincommittingappellantto < CYA.